dwkwootton
Mouseketeer
- Joined
- Oct 13, 2004
- Messages
- 340
Many of you have been so quick to shoot that you have not listened well, missed the point on many issues, and have yet to ask questions, let alone discuss anything with anyone to get a better understanding of how they feel, why, or anything.
I guess some would admire the moxie of the poster who had the audacity to launch an attack so vicious that I had to read it twice to believe it ... to impune the character of those who she decided had impuned someone's character and to chastise those who wanted less than she had taken for herself or who chose to sail in a less risky season that she had chosen to sail in. Um, ok, would that be do as I say and you're scum if you do as I do?
Evidently, you best not post anything negative if you sail during half of the calendar year ~ from August to November, January, or February. And never forget that if it was better than being at work or in the path of the tsunami, any criticism makes you a greedy, ungrateful human being with a bad attitude. I'm not sure which group I'll be lumped into since I had a great time on the first 7 or 8 Disney Cruises I took, including the ones with bad weather. My character and attitude have not changed dramatically in the 7 months since I last sailed. What is this panic that ensues at the mere suggestion that Disney did not do the best job that they could have?
As memory serves, it is not ok to be upset if you miss half your ports, but it is ok to complain and demand compensation if your departure port is changed or you have decided that you have sailed frequently enough to demand preferential treatment, even if you opt to sail in the height of hurricane season.
How can anyone think that the gal who ordered a diet sprite during the free glass of wine dinner should have been charged for it, whether she was diabetic or not? What about those who choose to not drink alcohol, they get nothing while some get a glass of wine? How about if you are allergic to sulfites, the next guy gets something and you get nothing? This is part of the point that was missed and one of the places where Disney dropped the ball ... it was a bad idea and did make for problems to choose what beverage would be your perk ... for pete's sake, just keep it simple and make the dinner a free beverage of your choice dinner.
Its enough already being subjected to the obnoxious group who attempts to intimidate those who don't agree with them. I've received PM's from several people over the months who agreed with something I said or whatever, who literally stated in their PM to me that they were afraid to post their opinion on the board. There are so many issues worthy of a good discussion from the 1-15 cruise, if only there were a discussion board to do so on.
I guess some would admire the moxie of the poster who had the audacity to launch an attack so vicious that I had to read it twice to believe it ... to impune the character of those who she decided had impuned someone's character and to chastise those who wanted less than she had taken for herself or who chose to sail in a less risky season that she had chosen to sail in. Um, ok, would that be do as I say and you're scum if you do as I do?
Evidently, you best not post anything negative if you sail during half of the calendar year ~ from August to November, January, or February. And never forget that if it was better than being at work or in the path of the tsunami, any criticism makes you a greedy, ungrateful human being with a bad attitude. I'm not sure which group I'll be lumped into since I had a great time on the first 7 or 8 Disney Cruises I took, including the ones with bad weather. My character and attitude have not changed dramatically in the 7 months since I last sailed. What is this panic that ensues at the mere suggestion that Disney did not do the best job that they could have?
As memory serves, it is not ok to be upset if you miss half your ports, but it is ok to complain and demand compensation if your departure port is changed or you have decided that you have sailed frequently enough to demand preferential treatment, even if you opt to sail in the height of hurricane season.
How can anyone think that the gal who ordered a diet sprite during the free glass of wine dinner should have been charged for it, whether she was diabetic or not? What about those who choose to not drink alcohol, they get nothing while some get a glass of wine? How about if you are allergic to sulfites, the next guy gets something and you get nothing? This is part of the point that was missed and one of the places where Disney dropped the ball ... it was a bad idea and did make for problems to choose what beverage would be your perk ... for pete's sake, just keep it simple and make the dinner a free beverage of your choice dinner.
Its enough already being subjected to the obnoxious group who attempts to intimidate those who don't agree with them. I've received PM's from several people over the months who agreed with something I said or whatever, who literally stated in their PM to me that they were afraid to post their opinion on the board. There are so many issues worthy of a good discussion from the 1-15 cruise, if only there were a discussion board to do so on.

