froggy922
Mouseketeer
- Joined
- Jul 12, 2012
- Messages
- 131
Sorry if this has already been discussed. I've searched all the threads and I couldn't find an answer to this...
I'm getting an start on our planning for our next WDW trip in early 2017. It will be me and DH and DS (age 8 at the time) and we will be driving so we will have a car. We just decided to add two days at US/IOA, so I need to figure out the best option for adding our two US/IOA days. I know WDW like the bakc of my hand, but we haven't been to US/IOA so that's all new to me and I need to figure out our options. Here's what I've come up with so far:
1) Do 2 days, 1 night at a US hotel before our WDW trip
2) Do 2 days, 1 night at a US hotel after our WDW trip
3) Stay the whole time at our WDW hotel and just go to US on two days
4) Open to suggestions
.
Here is my train of thought on each one:
1) I can get a full experience of US/IOA, convenience of staying on-site at US, and taking advantage of express passes being included with our hotel, splits the whole trip into two separate parts/hotels (not necessarily bad or good, but a factor)
2) All the same as above, but the US/IAO would be after a week in Disney. I worry about tired feet, and the mind-shift from WDW to US. Usually after a week in WDW, we are pretty worn out so I'm not sure we would be "fresh" for a new adventure. Between options 1 and 2 I'm leaning more toward 1 over 2 (but could be persuaded).
3)We wouldn't have to split up our trip into two parts/hotels, we would have to pay for express passes, would have to factor in driving to/from US those two days. Would give us some flexibility on the days we went (could do US in the middle of our week or on an off day). The dining package is a factor for us though: we always do the dining package and if we did the package, it would give us more credits than we would really need (since at least two meals on those two days would be away from WDW) Con: this could end up being wasteful, BUT, on the pro side, it could allow us to use the extra TS credits on meals that require 2 credits (like CRT or HDDR, or CG) that we've never been able to do before. Also, extra QS credits could be used for snacks but I think we would still end up with a surplus of QS and snack credits. So there is an upside and downside to having the dining package wit this option.
4) suggestions
Right now, I'm leaning toward #1 or #3, but would appreciate any feedback or other suggestions. Also, any extra advice you'd like to give about US/IOA would be appreciated since this will be our first visit to US/IOA. Thanks!
I'm getting an start on our planning for our next WDW trip in early 2017. It will be me and DH and DS (age 8 at the time) and we will be driving so we will have a car. We just decided to add two days at US/IOA, so I need to figure out the best option for adding our two US/IOA days. I know WDW like the bakc of my hand, but we haven't been to US/IOA so that's all new to me and I need to figure out our options. Here's what I've come up with so far:
1) Do 2 days, 1 night at a US hotel before our WDW trip
2) Do 2 days, 1 night at a US hotel after our WDW trip
3) Stay the whole time at our WDW hotel and just go to US on two days
4) Open to suggestions
. Here is my train of thought on each one:
1) I can get a full experience of US/IOA, convenience of staying on-site at US, and taking advantage of express passes being included with our hotel, splits the whole trip into two separate parts/hotels (not necessarily bad or good, but a factor)
2) All the same as above, but the US/IAO would be after a week in Disney. I worry about tired feet, and the mind-shift from WDW to US. Usually after a week in WDW, we are pretty worn out so I'm not sure we would be "fresh" for a new adventure. Between options 1 and 2 I'm leaning more toward 1 over 2 (but could be persuaded).
3)We wouldn't have to split up our trip into two parts/hotels, we would have to pay for express passes, would have to factor in driving to/from US those two days. Would give us some flexibility on the days we went (could do US in the middle of our week or on an off day). The dining package is a factor for us though: we always do the dining package and if we did the package, it would give us more credits than we would really need (since at least two meals on those two days would be away from WDW) Con: this could end up being wasteful, BUT, on the pro side, it could allow us to use the extra TS credits on meals that require 2 credits (like CRT or HDDR, or CG) that we've never been able to do before. Also, extra QS credits could be used for snacks but I think we would still end up with a surplus of QS and snack credits. So there is an upside and downside to having the dining package wit this option.
4) suggestions
Right now, I'm leaning toward #1 or #3, but would appreciate any feedback or other suggestions. Also, any extra advice you'd like to give about US/IOA would be appreciated since this will be our first visit to US/IOA. Thanks!