VandVsmama
DIS Veteran
- Joined
- Mar 28, 2011
- Messages
- 8,882
Deleted because I changed my mind.
As a former Californian myself (born and lived there for 28 years) I think we can all agree that California is a strange place. So no surprises there.Welll......did you know that Disneyland would never have happened...if not for a pirate.....for sure the first pirate in the Pacific Ocean, heck, was even credited with piracy ,...granted he did for the sake of change, change his ship's name from Pelican to Golden Hind....can we say Hind on this site?
That is why I was taught California History....to emulate pirates.
.Walt was all about change. So many things I used to love about Disneyland are now gone. And that's ok. It's not my park. But I still go and it still makes me happy. For those complaining about the change - were you also complaining when they added the movie characters? Jack Sparrow is definitely about "synergy" and not at all about "history.
.
Actually I hated the addition of Jack sparrow personally.
Exactly. So Disneyland should leave it ALONE!I can only judge this change as better or worse after it's been implemented. The new scene sounds just as fun as the old. It's a Disney Park ride, designed for entertainment. None of it is supposed to be historically accurate in the first place. Erasing history is burning textbooks, tearing down museums, or magically destroying the internet. A Disney Park ride's got nothing to do with it.
Oh i so agree. And i was born and raised here. Still here.....but.. ..tbh a nice little house in LA or Texas, is actually affordable and realistic, but California real estate wellAs a former Californian myself (born and lived there for 28 years) I think we can all agree that California is a strange place. So no surprises there.
![]()
I will take a stab...Jumping in here way late but I have been reading along. I'm kind of indifferent to the whole thing. I understand why they would want to get rid of it but I personally wouldn't care if it stayed. I also do not care if they change it. It's not detrimental to the ride imo and I'm sure I'll like it just the same. I'm one of those people that doesn't really care when they change things though. I like seeing change and progress. I love when new things are introduced and don't even mind if and when beloved rides are changed. I'd be interested to see what kind of change could happen to a ride that might actually make me upset about it.
I will take a stab...
Bulldoze CarsLand because cars cause global warming?
Remove all references in POTC ride to: theft, burning towns, gun violence, torture (waterboarding the mayor)
![]()
"Times and conditions change so rapidly that we must keep our aim constantly focused on the future." ~ Walt Disney
I will take a stab...
Bulldoze CarsLand because cars cause global warming?
Remove all references in POTC ride to: theft, burning towns, gun violence, torture (waterboarding the mayor)
![]()
Too damned funny!Well the most logical plan would be to modernize it. Make Disneyland free admission, but convert the ride to make it Pirates of Somalia. The ride would be mandatory before entering the park. The pirates would hijack the boats and hold passengers for ransom. In order to free your family and friends, you would be charged $129 per person. Additional ransom would be charged if they wanted to park hop. Once the ransom was paid, guests would be allowed to enter the rest of the park.
Well the most logical plan would be to modernize it. Make Disneyland free admission, but convert the ride to make it Pirates of Somalia. The ride would be mandatory before entering the park. The pirates would hijack the boats and hold passengers for ransom. In order to free your family and friends, you would be charged $129 per person. Additional ransom would be charged if they wanted to park hop. Once the ransom was paid, guests would be allowed to enter the rest of the park.