Response to Multiculturalism

Originally posted by Kendra17
I never said the entire Muslim culture. I have never said this on any thread--and I don't believe that a statement such as this would be true.

You have repeatedly referred to Arabs as "they" when you make your derogatory remarks, making no distinguishment between wild fanatics, and the vast majority of their population.


Now, and I am not the exclusive holder of this belief--that there may be some fundamental flaw in the culture of Islam that would cause a disproportionate amount of terrorists to be borne from this culture. You can dispute this, but can you give an alternative?

I think you're oversimplifying here. You're ignoring all the other causes of terrorism. How about poor social conditions, and oppressive governmental regimes, for starters. Or maybe the horrendous treatment of these countries by most of the Western world. To say that they hate you and I because of their religion is irresponsible. The causes are numerous. As far as I'm concerned, the religion isn't dangerous, but the radicals who distort its teachings are. There is a big difference.


The Jewish people were persecuted for much much longer than Muslims and they NEVER resorted to the type of terrorism that these Islamists resort to.

Try running that by some Palestinian families, and see how far you get.


Yes, Oracle gave me some sites to look at. However, those are a few quiet voices among many loud voices and I'm skeptical of these sites, because they are not written critically.

Are they quiet voices because you weren't listening, or because the media didn't cover them as much? That's not their fault. And what do you mean, "not written critically"?? Of course they're not, they are collections of quotes. What exactly would you have expected?


And, to compare that to the few Christian anti-abortionists is just ludicrous. Those that commit murder are condemned in our society.

And the links I gave you showed that they were condemned in the Arab society too.

And, Christians (and I am not a Christian) do not approve of this and it isn't done with biblical endorsement. . .a key difference.

Are you even hearing yourself? Muslims don't approve of this either, and they don't have scriptural endorsement either. So no, it's not a key difference.

And, the mainstream churches don't endorse those deeds either. The Koran DOES endorse Jihad.

I think you need to re-read things.

And, those that follow it believe they are going to heaven over it. This is a CULTURAL problem.

Abortion doctor killers think they are doing God's work too. Is that a cultural problem?


Whether this represents the minority is of no matter. This a culture that is producing mass murderers that commit gruesome acts of terror directed at INNOCENT CIVILIANS.


Actually, this is the heart of the matter, and that's why you just don't get it. Our culture produced Timothy McVeigh, the KKK, and the highest murder rates in the world. Does that mean we're inferior too?

Yes, all religions have some that stray from the mainstream. . .but we are talking about an 8% of a population of 1.5 billion. That's an awful lot of extremists.

Could we get some documentation for this? Links, references, anything? Who is this guy you're quoting here? How do we know he's reliable?


Who knows more about Islam? Oracle or Osama bin Laden? I would venture to guess Osama bin Laden.

I don't know what this has to do with anything. I think the important thing is that you know very little about the religion, yet you have no trouble criticizing it, and branding the whole group as extremists.
 
Originally posted by frndshpcptn
Kendra - first of all, I apologize for assuming that you were a Christain. I should not have.

Second, I just want to make sure I understand your point of view. You are aruging that Western Culture (not just U.S. culture, but any Westernized society including Europe, etc.) is superior to any Arabic Culture. What about the other cultures of the world? Where do they fall into place? I'm asking seriously here, that was not a sarcastic comment. There has been so much written on this thread so far that I want to make sure I am staying on point.

I do want to discuss the other points in your responses (i.e. never forgeting the Holocaust, Israel/Palestine, appreciating other cultures, etc.) but want to make sure I am understanding the fundamental point of the thread first.

Thank you.

No apology necessary; I am not offended by any means.

Yes, you understand the thrust of my argument. This started from a study I had posted which specifically compared these two cultures. Any culture that would promote these values: affirming life, freedom, education, scientific discovery, pursuit of knowledge, religious freedom, monogomy, equal rights would be worthy for the reasons I mentioned.

I don't want to confuse the argument by bringing other cultures to the equation. My bil and sil live in Japan. I admire the culture there--although there are differences, they share the same value system we do. The point is, there is not a segment of the population that are blowing up our children or expressing their desire of our nation. Not in the name of Buddhism, Shintoism, not at all.
 
Originally posted by Kendra17
Any culture that would promote these values: affirming life, freedom, education, scientific discovery, pursuit of knowledge, religious freedom, monogomy, equal rights would be worthy for the reasons I mentioned.


Maybe I am missing something...are you saying that the culture here, in the US, exemplifies the characteristics you outline above?

affirming life: we are rightfully concerned about the loss of life on Sept. 11....are we equally concerned about the 24,000 lives lost worldwide EVERY DAY from hunger or hunger related causes?

freedom: particularly if you are white and can afford a good attorney

education: again, particularly if your are white and are affluent

scientific discovery: as long as those in charge agree with the methodology

pursuit of knowledge: tell that to the folks on the Drake University campus that were pursuing issues of peace and found themselves in trouble with the patriot act

religious freedom: as long as you don't want freedom FROM religion

monogomy: approxitmatley half of Americans surveyed say that they have been unfaithful in marriage

equal rights: there is not enough time or space for me to refute this one

All I am trying to say is that we (US citizens) have by no means cornered the market on moral behavior. And for me (I am a Christian) it is important that I:
1. get the log out of my eye before I comment on the speck in someone elses
2. Examine my own life before I cast a stone


I am still waiting for an answer to an earlier question: Why is it OK to dismember an innocent with a bomb, but not ok to behead someone? (and I am NOT saying that I approve of beheading)

Anne
 
Originally posted by oracle
You have repeatedly referred to Arabs as "they" when you make your derogatory remarks, making no distinguishment between wild fanatics, and the vast majority of their population.

Well, let's see if I can correct whatever I did to cause that ambiguity. I think there is a fundamental flaw in the Arab culture since they have way too many terrorists that are killing in the name of Allah. Sorry. That's the truth. So, although I don't think all Arabs or all Middle Easterners are terrorists, I think the culture that has borne these terrorists needs reform. The character of that reformation should be away from dogmatism and hatred and towards humanitarianism and peace.

i think you're oversimplifying here. You're ignoring all the other causes of terrorism. How about poor social conditions, and oppressive governmental regimes, for starters. Or maybe the horrendous treatment of these countries by most of the Western world. To say that they hate you and I because of their religion is irresponsible. The causes are numerous. As far as I'm concerned, the religion isn't dangerous, but the radicals who distort its teachings are. There is a big difference.

How do you suppose that the United States can end poverty, injustice, inhumanity, and tyranny around the world when you won't even accept the right of America to defend itself? Poverty and injustice have existed in this world since the beginning of time. If you accept poverty and injustice, concerns that have challenged mankind for millenia as a justification for murder, rape, beheadings, torture, kidnapping, and wholesale slaughter, you are, by far, more confused than you appeared. If you are making the argument that until the United States, apparently the sole responsible party for poverty and injustice in the world, eliminate these scourges, then no American will be safe anywhere on the planet. That's beyond absurdity!

Many people on this board have recognized as I do, and you do not, that not all Muslims are terrorists and killers but that the vast majority of terrorists and killers are Muslims. This is an essential truth that no one can ignore. While you may choose to ignore it ANYWAY, it does not change the fact of the matter. Something has gone appallingly wrong in current-day Islam. And, I would think you'd want to figure out what that is--quickly.

Try running that by some Palestinian families, and see how far you get.

Regarding your confusion about who is right and who is wrong in this Israeli-Palestinian conflict, even the Leftist lawyer political opportunist John Edwards tonight--in the debate--specifically stated that the Israeli people had a RIGHT to defend themselves against these Palestinian murderers. I ask you this: if John Edwards, the flak for the wannabe John Kerry, can understand and articulate that Israel has a right to defend itself against attack, how can you be so confused about which side is right and wrong when one side kills children asleep in their beds, blows them up on their way to school, and shoots innocents at dinnertime in public restaurants and the other side responds by targeting the murderers themselves? There is a deep disturbing moral and ethical confusion in this thread--and it certainly does not rest within the OP.

Are they quiet voices because you weren't listening, or because the media didn't cover them as much? That's not their fault. And what do you mean, "not written critically"?? Of course they're not, they are collections of quotes. What exactly would you have expected?
And the links I gave you showed that they were condemned in the Arab society too.


Your assertion that Islamic leaders condemn the murderers and the bombers and the beheaders is not backed up by the facts. Posting a web site or 2 or 4 is not equivalent to a public address from a mosque--is not equivalent to a leader of State condemning the violence in public. The silence of the Muslim majority is, perhaps, one of the scariest components for our futures--because, their silence, as I've stated, is nothing less than tacit approval or fear. And, those who would kill and rape children or behead our fellow Americans can not be anything but our enemies.

Are you even hearing yourself? Muslims don't approve of this either, and they don't have scriptural endorsement either. So no, it's not a key difference.

There are a great deal of scriptural endoresements. Are you kidding or specifically attempting to spread falsities? I've studied the Koran, Oracle. . .you must know nothing of Arab culture to say such a thing. I was in a discussion like this in the past, and the thread was closed when was just about to post the supporting surrahs. You absolutely don't know what you are talking about. There is surrah after surrah advocating the violence I am referring to. That's why the sites you listed aren't credible nor critical in it's assessment of Islam.

Abortion doctor killers think they are doing God's work too. Is that a cultural problem? Actually, this is the heart of the matter, and that's why you just don't get it. Our culture produced Timothy McVeigh, the KKK, and the highest murder rates in the world. Does that mean we're inferior too?

Your points about abortion doctor killers and Tim McVeigh is more of your classic tactic of confusing the issue with red herrings. Abortion doctor killers and extremist Right Wing bombers in teh United States represent a FAR smaller proportion of the population than do Islamic terrorists of theirs. Also, and this is the important point, every single act of terror by an American against Americans or anybody has always--WITHOUT EXCEPTION--been met with a MASSIVE outpouring of condemnation by the American people. In contrast, the daily violence and murders and bombings of the Islamic fanatics are met with nothing but silence by the Islamic world community. There are exceptions of this silence, however, as you may recall. The exception to the silence of the Islamic world in the face of Islamist terrorism are cheering and support--financial and moral. You may recall that on 9-11, thousands of Palestinians wer literally dancing in the streets and passed out candy to children in the West Bank and Gaza to celebrate the murder of Americans. This is just one of many reasons why the pathetic PA cannot possibly have American support.

Could we get some documentation for this? Links, references, anything? Who is this guy you're quoting here? How do we know he's reliable?

Don't ask me about Daniel Pipes' reliability or credentials. He's a highly respected academic and author. If, after reading his material, you find him of no moment then you should ask your credential oriented questions. However, my guess is, you ask the credential question first so that you don't have to do your homework. Pipes is a highly regarded Ivy League academic and author and one of the better analysts and commentators on Islamic Fundamentalism and terrorism. Pipes is not an apologist; he's objective and his conclusions are difficult to refute. www.meforum.org, www.danielpipes.org

I don't know what this has to do with anything. I think the important thing is that you know very little about the religion, yet you have no trouble criticizing it, and branding the whole group as extremists.

You would be correct if I indeed knew very little, but I know very much. And, if you don't know Daniel Pipes, then it is obvious you know very little. Even the late Edward Said, Trevor Roper, CAIR--all of the apologists out there, know who he is. That's the important thing. . you are attempting to refute my arguments based on the way you really wish or the way you really want the world to be--not the way it really is. If you ever want the world to get where you wish it to be, however, you have to be intellectually honest, face the truth with all its warts, and then try to fix it.
 

Originally posted by luvsTink
Maybe I am missing something...are you saying that the culture here, in the US, exemplifies the characteristics you outline above?

affirming life: we are rightfully concerned about the loss of life on Sept. 11....are we equally concerned about the 24,000 lives lost worldwide EVERY DAY from hunger or hunger related causes?

freedom: particularly if you are white and can afford a good attorney

education: again, particularly if your are white and are affluent

scientific discovery: as long as those in charge agree with the methodology

pursuit of knowledge: tell that to the folks on the Drake University campus that were pursuing issues of peace and found themselves in trouble with the patriot act

religious freedom: as long as you don't want freedom FROM religion

monogomy: approxitmatley half of Americans surveyed say that they have been unfaithful in marriage

equal rights: there is not enough time or space for me to refute this one

All I am trying to say is that we (US citizens) have by no means cornered the market on moral behavior. And for me (I am a Christian) it is important that I:
1. get the log out of my eye before I comment on the speck in someone elses
2. Examine my own life before I cast a stone


I am still waiting for an answer to an earlier question: Why is it OK to dismember an innocent with a bomb, but not ok to behead someone? (and I am NOT saying that I approve of beheading)

Anne

I don't agree with any of your points you listed.

We have an ideal we try to reach in America.

Since you've asked that last question twice, I'll answer this: I would like to answer your question succinctly, but this is not possible. Your question is a reformulation of one of the fundamental questions of philosophy which is: when is it acceptable to take another's life? My answer to you would require more time than I now have at my disposal. I do not mean to dismiss you or your question. I am assuming that you asked the question in good faith, because I am answering you also in good faith. Unfortunately, we do not live in a Utopian world. Unfortunately, we live in a world where people commit heinous crimes and organized populations led by governments respond--sometimes by killing in their turn. While I can't go in depth with this discussion now, there is a fundamental difference between killing a child asleep in his or her bed or riding innocently on the school bus or eating a slice of Pizza at a restaurant in contrast with a government that targets the perpetrators of these atrocities and accidentally kill innocents.

This is a time, truly, of clarity. There really is no question of who is good and who is evil in the conflicts that we now face. While the majority of us abhor killing as a rule, those who kill innocents to further their political or religious agendas have passed beyond the pale of the human family, and wait only for the opportunity for the aggrieved to deliver justice to them.

Unfortunately, for all of us, we now live in a deeply bifurcated world in which lunatics feel justified by their religious books and their religious leaders to commit the most appalling and heinous crimes against innocents. We no longer have the luxury of sitting on the sidelines while we examine the nature of our souls. Those who kill and rape children, like the demons of Beslan, are evil. You may not like the term for whatever reason. However, if you identify yourself with the forces of Good, then you must prop yourself up and fight against these evil-doers in the world.

While self-examination and introspection are absolutely wonderful and useful things, they are so often used as an excuse to fence-sit and take no position or action. There is a movement rising in the world characterized by vicious murder, cruelty, and inhumanity. What other term would you use to describe such a movement other than evil?
 
Yes, you understand the thrust of my argument. This started from a study I had posted which specifically compared these two cultures. Any culture that would promote these values: affirming life, freedom, education, scientific discovery, pursuit of knowledge, religious freedom, monogomy, equal rights would be worthy for the reasons I mentioned.

So, maybe then multiculturalism isn't bad. Cultures who promote violence against innocent people are bad, but there are many cultures out in the world who contribute greatly to society. Using the criteria you posted above, there are many nations around the world that fit the bill. To say that one is better would be a diservice to others. Many countries have contributed greatly to American society. All of our grandparents and great grandparents brought parts of their home countires with them when they settled here, and we are all the better for it. But each country of origen still retains those properties that make it a unique and important part of our global culture.

But I do want to point out that those criteria stem from your experiences in life. How you were raised and educated. Your values are shaped by influences in your world and those are not uniform everywhere. I feel that as long as people are not hurting innocent other people, then I have no right to judge what they feel are important values.

No one is saying that terrorism, or those who support it are good. I think what people are saying is that in this global environment to say that one culture is superior to all others belittles our allies around the world.

I don't know the answers. I know that while walking through the Arab Quarter after visiting the Western Wall in Jerusalem we had extra military guards and were instructed to walk quickly and not stop until we reached the Jewish Quarter. Would that have been the same situation has we found ourselves in the Christian Quarter? I'm not sure. All I know is that the guards had their hands on the trigger of their guns the entire time we walked through and I am 100% sure would have shot any Arab that tried to "get" one of us. I find it sad that we have to deal with this.

But, they feel angry and repressed. They hate Jews and Americans and the state of Israel. Until their mindset can be changed, its the world we all have to live in. Does it make them a lesser society? I guess we have to examine the roots of what caused them to develop such a strong hatred in the first place. Does that mean I condone their behavior or think that they have a valid reason to terrorize the Western world? No. But thinking of them as lesser beings isn't the way to end the conflict in the middle east. They have centuries of hate in them, passed down from one generation to the next. Where does it stop? How do we convince the fundamentalist Arabs that we can exist side by side? Can we? Or is it too late and we now just have to find a way to live around the problem.

Tonight on the VP debate, Cheney said that by removing Saddam from power the US lessened the suicide bombers that attack Israel. I'd argue that while that may be a small part of why you hear about less bombings on the news, a more realistic reason would be the strategic and thorough Israeli Army checkpoints set up near border crossings. Those soldiers stop hundreds of terrorists from crossing into the country everyday. When I talked with some of those soldiers they told me stories of bombings that they stopped. Are we headed for that same scenario here in the states if we can't help find a way to peace?
 
Originally posted by frndshpcptn
So, maybe then multiculturalism isn't bad. Cultures who promote violence against innocent people are bad, but there are many cultures out in the world who contribute greatly to society. Using the criteria you posted above, there are many nations around the world that fit the bill. To say that one is better would be a diservice to others. Many countries have contributed greatly to American society. All of our grandparents and great grandparents brought parts of their home countires with them when they settled here, and we are all the better for it. But each country of origen still retains those properties that make it a unique and important part of our global culture.

But I do want to point out that those criteria stem from your experiences in life. How you were raised and educated. Your values are shaped by influences in your world and those are not uniform everywhere. I feel that as long as people are not hurting innocent other people, then I have no right to judge what they feel are important values.

No one is saying that terrorism, or those who support it are good. I think what people are saying is that in this global environment to say that one culture is superior to all others belittles our allies around the world.

I don't know the answers. I know that while walking through the Arab Quarter after visiting the Western Wall in Jerusalem we had extra military guards and were instructed to walk quickly and not stop until we reached the Jewish Quarter. Would that have been the same situation has we found ourselves in the Christian Quarter? I'm not sure. All I know is that the guards had their hands on the trigger of their guns the entire time we walked through and I am 100% sure would have shot any Arab that tried to "get" one of us. I find it sad that we have to deal with this.

But, they feel angry and repressed. They hate Jews and Americans and the state of Israel. Until their mindset can be changed, its the world we all have to live in. Does it make them a lesser society? I guess we have to examine the roots of what caused them to develop such a strong hatred in the first place. Does that mean I condone their behavior or think that they have a valid reason to terrorize the Western world? No. But thinking of them as lesser beings isn't the way to end the conflict in the middle east. They have centuries of hate in them, passed down from one generation to the next. Where does it stop? How do we convince the fundamentalist Arabs that we can exist side by side? Can we? Or is it too late and we now just have to find a way to live around the problem.

Tonight on the VP debate, Cheney said that by removing Saddam from power the US lessened the suicide bombers that attack Israel. I'd argue that while that may be a small part of why you hear about less bombings on the news, a more realistic reason would be the strategic and thorough Israeli Army checkpoints set up near border crossings. Those soldiers stop hundreds of terrorists from crossing into the country everyday. When I talked with some of those soldiers they told me stories of bombings that they stopped. Are we headed for that same scenario here in the states if we can't help find a way to peace?

Ahh, I needed a break! Now that I'm all calm again. . .. LOL

The only way to convince these lunatics and murderers, fanatics and reactionaries, is to defeat them--just as we defeated the Germans in WWII and the Japanese. And, guess what? They are now our friends and allies.

Look at the events of this evening. The terrorists blew up the Hilton Hotel on the Egyptian-Israeli border. All the casualties are probably Israeli. They do this because they have no respect for innocent life. Anyone who does not follow their beliefs, anyone who is a Jew, Israeli, or American is a fair target to them. One cannot reason with such thugs.

Let me touch on the multiculturalism issue for a moment and some of the points that you raised in your thoughtful post. Reality, despite the propaganda of multiculturalists, is not fundamentally subjective. Your life experience, or mine, are irrelevant to the truth of the immorality and cruel indecency and evil of the Islamist killers.

Your posts make it clear that you are trying to understand the incomprehensible. How does one "think about" the mass murder and rape of children in Beslan? How can one truly understand the murder of innocent children in their beds? We live in a visceral time. The people who want to kill us are venal and evil. Their political and religious aspirations are no longer relevant and should not be discussed seriously by decent people. Once mass murder of innocents, which they have done REPEATEDLY--over and over and over again---becomes their tactic, their issues must become irrelevant. I say this because any movement that would justify such activities and crimes cannot be reasoned with, negotiated with, nor can a peace treaty be drafted that will ever satisfy them. Their goal is nothing short of our nonexistence. For such an enemy, there can only be vigorous responses on our part and their defeat. And, upon their defeat, you will be amazed at the cowardice and moral bankruptcy of these people.

The liberal left propaganda outlets are making a big play about the recently released report that Iraq does not have any stockpiles of WMD. All reasonable people with any understanding of Saddam Hussein and his tyranny and his nuclear aspirations understand that the many months leading up to our invasion of Iraq and the ousting of Saddam, was more than enough time to move every speck of WMD to Syria or Iran.

The war continues, even as we speak. There is no cause for anyone's confusion over who is right and who is wrong. I stand on the side of those who fight against the murderers of Americans, Russians, Israelis, Australians, Spaniards, and Englishmen and many, many more. If there was ever a time that moral clarity could come so readily to a thoughtful and reasonable person, now is certainly that time.

One more thing regarding your concern that I am politically incorrect to identify our culture or any other culture as "superior" to another culture. Think of Beslan, think of the terrorists in Israel killing children in their beds, think of the train bombing in Madrid, think of the nightclub bombing in Bali, and think of 9-11. There is no question that a culture that produces murderers on this scale--who are capable of the depths of evil that these people have reached--is deficient in comparison to our own civil society built upon popular representation, sovereignty, rule of law, and a deep respect for innocent life.

In conclusion, and this has been said many times, not all Muslims are terrorists, but the vast majority of terrorists are Muslim. There is a lesson to be learned here--which doesn't need to be elucidated by me or anyone else on this board--you really need to make up your own mind.
 

New Posts


Disney Vacation Planning. Free. Done for You.
Our Authorized Disney Vacation Planners are here to provide personalized, expert advice, answer every question, and uncover the best discounts. Let Dreams Unlimited Travel take care of all the details, so you can sit back, relax, and enjoy a stress-free vacation.
Start Your Disney Vacation
Disney EarMarked Producer






DIS Facebook DIS youtube DIS Instagram DIS Pinterest DIS Tiktok DIS Twitter

Add as a preferred source on Google

Back
Top Bottom