0bli0 said:
the reason i highly recommend the holga is it really makes you stop and think. it's almost fully automatic - the shutter speed is fixed around 1/30 second and the aperture only sorta changes (supposedly between f/8 & f/11). rolls of film are not too much more than 35mm, but you will only get either 16 or 12 shots per roll. and that's the beauty of it. it's so easy to go out and fire off a few hundred pictures because you can delete them. after shooting and reviewing about 3 rolls of 120 film, you will find yourself being far more selective. you will start to compose in your head, rather than shoot-n-chimp (note: chimping is a highly technical term used to describe the sound made when one reviews shots on the LCD screen - ooh - look at that one - oh! that one turned out).
you can sorta simulate the experience on digital, but don't cheat! on a day where you're going to take photos, limit yourself to 12 pictures. set your iso to either 100 or 400. put the camera in manual mode. set the shutter speed for 1/30 and you can change your aperture between f/8 and f/11. pick a focal length and then don't adjust it (or better yet, use a prime)
if medium format really is prohibitive, then pick up a cheap manual 35mm rangefinder although it's not nearly as much fun
groucho said:
I'm with Captain Crash. I'd go for a higher-end used camera rather than a cheaper new camera. Besides price, you're more likely to find information about the camera on the internet for an older camera - more reviews, more real-world experiences from owners, etc.
Similar to 0bli0, if you're really serious, it's not a terrible idea to pick up a film-based SLR or similar, if you don't get a digital SLR. (Medium-format is cool but won't it be that much more expensive to buy and develop the film?) There are many good ones out there. The "classic" student camera is, of course, the Pentax K1000. It's extremely simple, rugged, and capable of beautiful photographs. They can regularly be found on eBay or locally for fairly cheap (probably $50 or less with a lens or two), and because it's completely manual (the only electronics are the needle that shows you the exposure), you will get some experience playing with F-stops, shutter speed, focus, etc. (ISO is not such an option with film since you can't just change it at any time, unlike with a digital SLR.)
Any film SLR will do, of course, but if you get one with extra features, try to run it as close to fully manual as possible. Maybe a relative has an old SLR lying around in the back of the closet that they'll let you have? You can use the digital primarily and if you have a shot that looks good on the digital, pull out the SLR to put it on film.
You may also want to set some money aside for a couple good books, or check out your local library. Older books are still valuable for learning - the basics of framing, exposure, etc have not changed in decades!
These are really great ideas...
... I remember my days in High School photography class. My friends shot mwith Pentax K-1000s, Canons, Olympus SLRs and I had my "snobby" black Nikon FE and 2 lenses ... a 50mm f1.4 and a vivitar 70-200 f?. I still have it although I think it was NOT working (even on manual setting 1/90th) so it needs service. I also have the MD12 motor.
Back then we rotated through many projects and developed our own black and white in the dark room. There was considerably more flexability with aperatures and speed (shutter and film generally) then with a
holga and 1/30th shooting f11 or f8. I always wanted to shoot medium format but never when into it. The restriction to the
holga settings would REALLY FORCE me to think about the light, composition and hold really steady OR use a tripod with every shot.
This listing was from the acual manufacturer - I think?
Holgas seem to sell for $40-60 with shipping on eBay. I am intrigued... but am more likely to pay for a servicing on my old Nikon then buy this 120 camera. Then I would simulate the restrictions of shooting with a Holga on the Nikon or possibly my DSLR. And THAT would be tough to do given we can push to ISO 800 cleanly and shoot several hundred best resolution images at zero cost (other than estimated cost per shot towards a shutter and mirror assembly replacement on a worn out camera!).
Speaking of which... I really need to self impose restrictings on the shooting volume limits (or lack of which) I exercise. I'm gonna draw some snickers now and admit that my last "big" vacation I shot about 500 images a day! That was INSANE... as about half were during low light shows or of beaches. It's more then I expected to shoot - and technically amounts to about 1/5th to 1/6th of the shutter assembly life (25-35,000) frames. As for the mirror assembly I do not know what the actuation ife is on that.
Anyway, I did not expect to shoot that much and have already set up self imposed limits on shooting. I'm holding out for the 30D replacement which should be the stepped up 400D/Xti with a magnesium body and digic 3/and anti-dust design. THEN... I'll be holding out a little further for the thing to drop in price and... if possible... I'll wait for THAT 40d(?) to itself be replaced by a 50D so the as yet unreleased 40D will go on clearance! The idea being that it wil fall out of vogue but have everything I'm coveting. The aforementioned D3, anti-dust, and 100,000 shutter, faster low light focusing system and solid magnesium construction. AND... with my luck the 50D will have the LAST thing I'd likely covet... weather sealing! Then I'd be chafing to hold off for a 60D so I could get a shot at the 50D (weather sealed) for a clearance price!
So, technically my crystal ball has seen the 10D intro on 27 Feb 2003, the 20D intro on 19 Aug 2004, and the 30D intro on 21 Feb 2006. I'm predicting the 40D will be announced in Aug of 2007 and its' replacement (50D?) should appear in Feb of 2009. So... can I possibly hold out until 2009 to buy the D/C 40D?
Well... my 10D came out initially at $2000 and fell to a street price of $1500 in a few weeks. Then, I bought mine used on eBay in Nov of 2005 for $590 ($10 shipping and no tax). That is 33 months after intro on the 10D and about a 60% savings. I've been ucky with mine too... as I've run through 12-15,000 frames with no issues oif any kind!
The 1st digicam I ever bought was the Canon G1 at $899 ... 2-3 weeks after it was introduced. Plus about $450 for a 1GB IBM microdrive... and now on ebay these two items together (G1+ a 2 or 4 GB MD) can be had for just under $100! That's 93.4% LESS in 6 years! That's far worse then the depreciation on an automobile! So... I am shifting my timing to defer purchases on depreciating bodies and I'm making cautious investments into lenses which seem to be holding thier values better. My 70-300 IS (non-DO) has bought new from B&H at about $550 reselling for 470-530 new on eBay... and $400-530 used but with minor accessories (filter and possibly a hood worth anywhere from $15-80). ..... And as for my other lenses, they were all bought used on eBay and can be resold for what I paid. The 70-300 was too new when I bought it and very few were on eBay - so I elected to buy from a reliable source.
Anyways... your best bet IMHO is to borrow a film SLR or repcreate the limitations of a Holga. And try checking the library for photography DVDs on FREE RENTAL. I just checked one out from our local library. And if your local library does not have any then ask the librarian to assit you in locating something cimilar in print or on DVD or video at an alternative branch library. It's so much fun exploring the tremendous creative and technical range of possibility available to you through photography. Plus, if nothing less... then you'll have a wonderful library of images from your life through YOUR eye from age 12 on up! I have lots of photos from my photography class days in high school and otherwise would have few visual memories that could rival the vivid accuracy of a half dozen photos from the time!
IE... the "fun" images you shoot now at age 12 will someday be incredibly priceless to you when you're older. AND, may I suggest you GUARD your collection against your parents who might filter them for use in a wedding reception video some day! LOL! I'm just kidding of course... except for the 5% most embarassing photos you may one day snap of yourself! Yes... photos of yourself! Those were some of the truly "fun" images I used to take with a tripod. One image I shot in high school was of myself appearing to be run over by construction equipment that was actually parked with me just clowning around with a tripod! Get my drift?
Don't try this at home ... unless you're using photoshop!