rockundergirl
rockundergirl
- Joined
- Feb 22, 2009
- Messages
- 367
Don't let anyone tell you to figure opportunity costs. That is a bunch of hogwash, although many say to do so. At worst it would add about a buck per point to your cost.
MG
Here is a link to a thread that I started a while ago that analyzes the numbers.
http://www.disboards.com/showthread.php?t=2137102
One should figure lost opportunity costs OR interest as a minimum. Of course it's not a simple calculation because you'd be using PART of those dollars for vacationing anyway. It's certainly not hogwash but it might or night no apply to everyone in the same way.I'll be one of the people pushing the hogwashas it definitely needs to be included into the equation IMHO. It adds about 4-5 years to your hypothetical break-even (for us about 10-14 years based on different interest rate assumptions), although that didn't deter us from buying into DVC recently.
If you take money from a savings/brokerage account you are giving up the interest you would otherwise earn on that money when buying DVC - whether it is significant to you or not is another question, especially with rates as low as they are now as well as what rate of return you would otherwise be generating on this money.
There are multiple ways that people can/do model DVC and for my analysis I did factor in the time value of money, and I also placed a higher weighting on current points (next 10 years) as opposed to those I'll be using in 40 years (again factoring in the TVM and "discounting" points I won't be using for 30-40 years). I compared keeping the money in a savings/brokerage account, and using that money (and the interest/return it generates) to "rent" points for our trips. As mentioned above depending on various assumptions that money would be "gone" in about 10-14 years if we continued renting. If we were to buy, at the same point in time (10-14 years from now) we would still have our points, and if we could sell our points for roughly the same amount of money as the MFs we've paid over that time we'll come out ahead in the long-term.
I can't help it, I'm a numbers geek, I'm not saying my way is the best by any stretch. Also had trouble "modeling" or putting a price on countless memories that DVC will enable our family to enjoy
Chris
One should figure lost opportunity costs OR interest as a minimum. Of course it's not a simple calculation because you'd be using PART of those dollars for vacationing anyway. It's certainly not hogwash but it might or night no apply to everyone in the same way.
OP, it might be a good deal if you don't go heavy on weekends, only use points for DVC and value staying on property. You should go through the info as to how it fits into your situation and usage patterns and decide what's best for you.
I was agreeing and adding some information as I see it.Dean -
I based this on money we'd be spending for WDW trips only - are you implying that people actually vacation somewhere other than WDW or DLR ?
Just kidding, in addition to my spreadsheets I perused many others, I basically just needed to know that buying DVC wasn't going to be a complete waste of money - and luckily that was the case. However there are so many variables that it's impossible to say "yes, DVC works for everyone." As always you laid out some great points about folks thinking hard about how they would like to use it as the results can vary significantly depending on how you use it.
Couldn't tell if you were agreeing with me or not to be honest. If you were - I'm thrilled, if you weren't I WAS OBVIOUSLY WRONG!!!
Chris
I was agreeing and adding some information as I see it.
Those are kind words Chris, thank you.Thanks - you made my dayI actually feel "smarter" knowing that you agreed with me
Over the past few years that I've been here on DIS I learned soooooo much, and without a doubt here is the most important thing I've learned :
When in doubt, I tend to value Dean's responses at the top of my list - as he will always provide an unbiased and extremely well thought out view that really helps put things in perspective.
Sometimes we may get answers that we don't "want" to hear but really "need" to hear in terms of decisions that we're contemplating and he does a great job of showing us the big picture. In addition I've really enjoyed some of the comparisions he's made between DVC and (dare I say) other TS systems.
Keep up the great work Dean, really appreciate all the incite you provide here on DIS (and TUG for that matter).
Chris