Well, you are totally right because in theory this new system sounds very good. But in practice, I'm already seeing major problems. Let's take one element in the mens' short program....the triple Axel...both Weir and Plushenko performed them cleanly, but Johnny's was, in the opinion of many, the best performed Axel of night, style-wise. But Plushenko's Axel received higher scores despite the fact that when he lands his jumps he sort of pitches forward. I can't figure out how on earth his Axel was rated higher than Weir's other than the fact that his last name is Plushenko.
However, in the men's competition, my griping is sort of moot. Plushenko is the best skater, easily the most proficient jumper and deserves to win. I'm just not sure he deserves to do so by such a suspense-killing, ridiculous margin. There's hardly any point in watching anymore.
As for the CHinese couple, I just don't agree that such a long disruption in the program basically cost them nothing (it is HIGHLY unlikely they would have landed that crazy jump anyway). I'm sure a perfectly skated program would have had to get them gold only because of the historic quad salchow. But are they basically saying that teams need to make history to have a chance to dethrone a bland Russian team? They (the russians) were not that much better than everyone else...they just weren't. They skated mechanically and received extremely high scores. I just think this new system has many kinks that need to be worked out.