sgtpet
DIS Veteran
- Joined
- Jul 18, 2001
- Messages
- 1,145
JohnHM and DVCdudes sensed where I was coming from. Just having a little fun since everybody gets so serious about which location is better.
Seriously, who cares. If you want SAB then buy into BCV or take chances at the 7 month window. Why would somebody want to pool hop to a location that is going to be more overcrowded than it can be today. I think I might even go over to the Poly pool for a change.
And for all our OKW fans your homes are much larger than the rest of the WDW DVC's. No slide though. Oh no not again...
Seriously, who cares. If you want SAB then buy into BCV or take chances at the 7 month window. Why would somebody want to pool hop to a location that is going to be more overcrowded than it can be today. I think I might even go over to the Poly pool for a change.
And for all our OKW fans your homes are much larger than the rest of the WDW DVC's. No slide though. Oh no not again...

Why do some people want to see an end to Poolhopping? Why do others think this is the beginning of the end even if they don't want to see it end? Other than SAB with it's capacity issues is there really enough poolhopping to create any kind of issue to make Disney stop this selling point? I say no. IF SAB is out of the equation, the perk is a win win for everyone...The pools are paid for. There are many pools and probably few hoppers on any given day. Therefore they create minimal "extra" use of any pool and virtually no extra cost to Disney. They can tout this as a "perk" to sell DVC and it costs them nothing. Why end it? Where are all the "headaches?" What does Disney gain by ending it? (other than at SAB where BCV will increase capacity to the breaking point apparently most of the year--though when we were there on a busy October weekend SAB was nearly deserted...and I know rooms were hard to come by at YC BC and BWV at that time because I had tried to book them)