jade1
I spend half my money on WDW, and waste the rest.
- Joined
- Dec 30, 2001
- Messages
- 11,648
yeah I understand that. I would've been fine with no animals on the Greenland portion, just the location. I just don't get the need to throw something at you for each transition.
Like the castle, and Sydney and the hot air balloons didn't need animals, it was just beautiful. How many animals were there in the old Soarin?
Oh I see what you are saying, it's not a wrong opinion by any means and shared by many. But we are now down to 2 scenes out of 13 plus the Taj. I doubt many folks would prefer no elephants in Africa but I guess they could remove them and the other scene remove the Polar Bears and whale. I wouldn't, I like the whale splash changing the scene and the dust from the elephant. The old splice like changing a tv channel is OK but not as cool IMO.
Either way, if its really 1000 times worse now-you can bet those small changes could and would and will be made soon to make it 1000 times better. I honestly can live with those changes and certainly would be fine with the Taj scene replaced. Just not enough to matter at this point, and certainly not enough to go back for us anyway.