New PVB declaration showed up in 4/10/26 county records

maui22

DIS Veteran
Joined
Jul 8, 2022
Messages
1,819
Eleventh Amendment to Declaration) for Polynesian Villas and Bungalows showed up today.

Dated 3/31/26 in the paperwork, but normal lag to have it filed in county records.

Units 93A and 93B are now officially part of PVB.

I believe (looking at it on phone)
  • 93A consists of
    • 3 Tower/Duo Studios
    • 3 Dedicated Studios
    • 1 Dedicated 1BR
  • 93B consists of
    • 2 Tower/Duo Studios
    • 2 Dedicated Studios
    • 2 Dedicated 1BRs
    • 3 Lock-off 2BRs
 
Last edited:
Does this Open more Fixed Weeks ?
Were there any that were actually closed? When I inquired in December 2025 and then actually purchased in 2026, my guide said all were available. I purchased mine and then let a DisBoards member that was told "no" before about it and they also got their favorite week too. But I think their guide was misinformed when they were told no.
 

Something to note: there seems to have been something wrong with one of the PVB declarations. The points initially reported for Unit 91B do not match the number of points in based on the percentage in the deeds. Thanks to @wdrl for pointing this out to me. Apparently it has happened with some other units he is aware of. It is possible this unit discrepancy is something they recently realized and it's why deeds suddenly slowed for PVB. They may need to file some correction.

PVB is now seeing deeds from it's most recent declaration. (92A, waiting on 92B).
@maui22, quoting from your other post. You mentioned there was something wrong with Unit 91B and I'm curious if this has been corrected and how? Does it mean that some contracts that were originally 91B will change to the new declaration. Also, is this new declaration 92A and 92B or did they jump to 93A/B? Realized I missed seeing the 10/25 declaration
 
Last edited:
@maui22, quoting from your other post. You mentioned there was something wrong with Unit 91B and I'm curious if this has been corrected and how? Does it mean that some contracts that were originally 91B will change to the new declaration. Also, is this new declaration 92A and 92B or did they jump to 93A/B?
Here was the 91AB declaration info.
https://dvcnews.com/wdw-resorts/pol...tower-adds-12-vacation-homes-to-dvc-inventory

Notice the total Wil reported in the article for 91B. The thing is contract percentages exceeded that amount. I don’t have my database of deeds in front of me, but believe it was around 192k. If you find a deed on the county website for unit 91B, you can figure the total by points and percentage of unit.
From memory, my numbers show total deed points in that unit exceed this number.

92AB were declared here
https://dvcnews.com/wdw-resorts/pol...s-island-tower-disney-vacation-club-inventory

I don’t look for corrections on these. Not even sure how they would fix their filing. Wil and Tim know this stuff far better than I ever will.

I am not affiliated with them, but do try to share my info and findings with them. As I have said many times, the whole community should be thankful to them. To my knowledge, they do this without profiting off of it which is truly amazing to dedicate 16-20 years on this.
 
Poly is at 54% sold. This time next year LL should be on-sale. Also there's some RIV left. And who knows what is really up with the cabins. I'm of the opinion that we're moving toward a sale somewhere to reduce inventory.

The article states just under 40% has been declared. So, sales cant be that high or am I missing something?
 
The article states just under 40% has been declared. So, sales cant be that high or am I missing something?
I suspect my including the links for 91AB and 92AB may have confused.

Post 6 above has the link to Wil’s article on the most recent declaration 93AB. 54.9% is what he mentioned in the article.

His February article mentioned 37%. With March and April to date 40% is likely.

Island Tower is definitely not 54% sold though.
 
Poly is at 54% sold.
The article states just under 40% has been declared. So, sales cant be that high or am I missing something?

The article maui posted above says: "This latest declaration brings the number of declared points at the Island Tower to 1,980,132 points, which is 54.9% of the Island Tower’s 3,608,934 estimated total points."

https://dvcnews.com/dvc-program-men...direct-sales-stay-the-course-in-february-2026

As of the end of February, that articles states the following:

"Disney has sold 1,335,685 points (37.0%) of the 3,608,934 points allotted to the residential units at Island Tower. At its current rate of sales the resort is on pace to be sold out in less than two and a half years."
 
Summer incentives historically have been some of the strongest... I can't imagine that this year will be an exception... But they might be worried it will sell too quickly... who knows...
Seems like RIV is in pretty good shape, I would think incentives will focus on CFW, AUL, VDH, and maybe PVB…but I wouldn’t expect much on PVB.
 
Seems like RIV is in pretty good shape, I would think incentives will focus on CFW, AUL, VDH, and maybe PVB…but I wouldn’t expect much on PVB.
I think Disney is happy with cash sales of DVC rooms at AUL. They should've used incentives long ago, but didn't.

I would love to see incentives at VDH. California is strange though. There's very little land for new hotels on property--so Disney might just wait that one out.

My guess for incentives - Cabins (yes!), RIV (to finish it off) and maybe something better for Poly.

I really think in terms of sales, Poly is the biggest problem. LSL and Poly are both DVC tower resorts facing the water in the MK neighborhood. I would think that DVD wouldn't want to have both in full sales mode at the same time. I'm guessing that DVD thought Poly would sell better and faster than it actually is. At one point, three years should've wiped out Poly DVC points inventory before LSL opened.

Bay Lake Tower (with about 30 more rooms than the Poly Tower) sold out in three years. I'm pretty sure that's what DVD was hoping for with Poly, especially as (a) it's smaller than Bay Lake Tower, (b) the pools and food offerings at Poly are far better than BLT, and (c) the grounds are superior to BLT.

But that's not how this is playing out.
 
I would love to see incentives at VDH. California is strange though. There's very little land for new hotels on property--so Disney might just wait that one out.
I do think VDH is a wild card. Whether or not they incentivize it probably has more to do with the strength of hotel bookings and expectations for economic conditions/travel headwinds over the next couple of years, I think?
My guess for incentives - Cabins (yes!), RIV (to finish it off) and maybe something better for Poly.
See I don’t think RIV is something they are eager to finish off, certainly not before LSL comes online. Also, the longer it’s in direct sales, the longer they can score cheaper resale contracts in ROFR, I think? I personally can never imagine buying restricted resale, but lots of people LOVE RIV and if your choice is $250 direct or resale, resale probably creeps up closer to $125?
I really think in terms of sales, Poly is the biggest problem. LSL and Poly are both DVC tower resorts facing the water in the MK neighborhood. I would think that DVD wouldn't want to have both in full sales mode at the same time.
I think you could be correct but I’m not sure— if they raise PVB another $20 points above the other resorts, they can use it to make LSL look like a great deal. Again, like VDH, their interest in selling a lot cheaper now vs selling high over the course of a decade probably depends on economic projections. If I was Disney, I’d probably try to protect Poly prices and just price LSL lower (maybe an amazing pre-opening incentive?) to move some of that less premium inventory instead?
I'm guessing that DVD thought Poly would sell better and faster than it actually is. At one point, three years should've wiped out Poly DVC points inventory before LSL opened.
I completely agree with you on this— I think they expected Poly to sell itself and not to have many buyers be as price-sensitive.
 










DIS Facebook DIS youtube DIS Instagram DIS Pinterest DIS Tiktok DIS Twitter

Add as a preferred source on Google

Back
Top Bottom