Ok, let me try and explain some things:
1. My source is someone I trust and can not reveal. Is this person 100% accurate? No. We all know that Disney has canceled plans before (ie; Eagle Pines). So time will tell.
2.
DVC Future Site You are correct, this is NOT an architectural drawing. It was a CONCEPT drawing (early on). Now, I can't explain (and don't care) that they used remodeling and not realignment. As to why the new road "realignment" goes through the race track...hmmmm....race track is not a money maker...race track is loud...race track really doesn't fit the area plans...Petty contract about up...hmmmm
3. Why "realign" the road? Could fix concerns/complaints from resort guests about waiting in car line with the rest of the crowd to get in. Why not create a dedicated resort roadway to solve problem. Only resort guests can stay. Fly over being expensive? What makes you think it will be a fly over? Easier (cheaper) to dig down under.
4. No infrastructure? The whole area is loaded with infrastructure. Doesn't take much effort/cost to tap into existing water and sewer.
5. Why this site over CR? Size of facility....first resort on EPCOT monorail...mixed use resort (
DVC and hotel designed from the start to be this way)...better themeing...easier to market to a wider audience. BTW, this doesn't eliminate the CR as a possibility for future growth.
6. I can't comment on the 16 story rumor. I have not heard that one...nor is my source saying what the theme will be (could be he/she doesn't know that).
7. 2008 opening? Possible. Picture this as a phased development (like SSR). Phase I opening late 2008.
Well, that is all I know...and someone who posted earlier was close...my signature is NUTS because I am nuts (so my wife says...but then I reminded her that she married me which must make her nuttier).
