Need opinions on DSLR before we make the leap!

[Groucho]

I haven't seen much in the way of hard reviews of the 7D yet but I would say that it's pretty darn unlikely that its new 18mp sensor has better high-ISO performance than the new 12mp K-x one. It is a tough comparison to make in any case as many manufacturers still apply some NR even when you tell the camera not to. A quick glance at early 7D reviews shows no mention of whether in-camera NR is on or off - I would think that it's safe to say that there's some serious work being done in there.

Regardless, like Kevin said, it's kind of irrelevant for the discussion, considering that it costs about 3x more than the K-x. The K-x is certainly the best-spec'ed entry-level DSLR at the moment and with the best high-ISO performance. Oh, and a decent quality kit lens with a hood and focus ring and non-rotating front element.

 

[DawnM]

I hate decisions! I am very bad at making them! When I started looking for a DSLR camera I had finally narrowed my choices down to 4 cameras, all were Nikon and Canon.

I finally just took DH to the camera store to play with them and let him make the final decision! He chose the Canon.

Go play with them at the store and feel/touch/etc.....

Good luck!

Dawn

 

[ogreenlee]

If you have the funds sure, but the kit lens only costs $100 more than body alone. The tamron will run you $400 or so I believe. With the bundles being offer now, you can get the 55-250mm for only another $100 or so. If you have the funds for the tamron later you can likely sell than kit 18-55 for $80 on eBay and get some of your money back.

I bought the nifty fifty with my kit lens bundle. That 50mm stayed on my camera b/c I just couldn't go back to the kit after seeing the difference. Having a prime lens is a good way for people to get used to a dSLR, imo. However, it will be a major pita having to use your feet to zoom in. lol Will it discourage or encourage?