McCain Ties to Rashid Khalidi

Island_Lauri

DIS Veteran
Joined
May 30, 2000
Messages
983
"The latest guilt-by-association target that the McCain campaign is using to hit Barack Obama could carry some collateral damage for its own candidate.

As Politico's Ben Smith reported on Tuesday, the McCain campaign is demanding that the Los Angeles Times release video in its possession of a party attended by Barack Obama and Columbia University professor Rashid Khalidi.

"A major news organization is intentionally suppressing information that could provide a clearer link between Barack Obama and Rashid Khalidi," said McCain spokesman Michael Goldfarb, citing Obama's friendship with Khalidi, who is now a professor at Columbia University.

The McCain camp gambit comes after conservative writers have repeatedly pressed for media outlets to write about the rather tenuous connections between Obama and Khalidi, an outspoken advocate for Palestinian rights.

Specifically, National Review writers want much more attention paid to the association, given that the LA Times has reported that Khalidi lavished praise on Obama at a farewell party in Chicago at which Bill Ayers was also present. (Other writers have accused Khalidi of being an aide to Yasser Arafat, a claim which Marc Ambinder and Ari Berman have suggested is not credible.)

In regards to Khalidi, however, the guilt-by-association game burns John McCain as well.

During the 1990s, while he served as chairman of the International Republican Institute (IRI), McCain distributed several grants to the Palestinian research center co-founded by Khalidi, including one worth half a million dollars.

A 1998 tax filing for the McCain-led group shows a $448,873 grant to Khalidi's Center for Palestine Research and Studies for work in the West Bank. (See grant number 5180, "West Bank: CPRS" on page 14 of this PDF.)

The relationship extends back as far as 1993, when John McCain joined IRI as chairman in January. Foreign Affairs noted in September of that year that IRI had helped fund several extensive studies in Palestine run by Khalidi's group, including over 30 public opinion polls and a study of "sociopolitical attitudes."

Of course, there's seemingly nothing objectionable with McCain's organization helping a Palestinian group conduct research in the West Bank or Gaza. But it does suggest that McCain could have some of his own explaining to do as he tries to make hay out of Khalidi's ties to Obama.

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2008/10/28/mccain-funded-work-of-pal_n_138606.html
 
Thank you for posting this. CNN did a fact check and reported this today.
 
I think it's a noble cause for McCain to help the Palestinian people, who have been oppressed by Isreal for so long. BUT having Khadidi involved makes me uncomfortable, considering his extremist views.
 
And McCain can thank Palin for bringing it up. :rotfl2: Maybe she's trying to make them lose? :confused3
 

I posted this information in another thread. I'm sure the Obama Haters (who will soon call him President Obama) just ignored it. They are so busy trying to spear Obama they see how hypocritical McCain is.
 
NO Say it isn't so John McCain would never do anything like that. Has anyone informed the neocons yet. Has anyone told DawnCt yet???:laughing:
 
It's okay. Some only see their world through clouded lenses. ;)
 
I thought he was just a distinguished professor?

Anywho...

McCain supporters have already come out against some of his policies and or actions.

Can't say that for 99.9 percent of OS.
 
I posted this information in another thread. I'm sure the Obama Haters (who will soon call him President Obama) just ignored it. They are so busy trying to spear Obama they see how hypocritical McCain is.

Here's another one that got lost in the shuffle. McCain's running mate is also a hypocrite!

"In August this year, a few weeks before being nominated for vice president, Sarah Palin said in an interview with Philip Gourevitch that Alaska is "set up, unlike other states in the union, where it's collectively Alaskans own the resources. So we share in the wealth when the development of these resources occurs."

The fact that Alaska issues checks to all its citizens from local oil company profits has been widely reported and was not relevant to today's news until similar words were uttered by Senator Obama to Joe the Plumber in Ohio. What these two stories point out is the importance of word choice when speaking in modern political campaigns.

The context of both Sarah Palin's comment about spreading wealth and Barack Obama's is very important, but the current news cycle is based on short quips. Fortunately for Palin, though Obama made the gaffe more recently, his was the only one reported on because it was in the context of a highly scrutinized national campaign.

So let this be a lesson to anyone planning to run for office: If you plan on saying anything about spreading or sharing wealth, say it now. When the world is watching, the meaning of your words isn't really up to you."

http://www.associatedcontent.com/art...re_in_the.html
 
NO Say it isn't so John McCain would never do anything like that. Has anyone informed the neocons yet. Has anyone told DawnCt yet???:laughing:

Please make sure she knows. She always wants to be up on what's happening. ;)
 
Here's another one that got lost in the shuffle. McCain's running mate is also a hypocrite!

"In August this year, a few weeks before being nominated for vice president, Sarah Palin said in an interview with Philip Gourevitch that Alaska is "set up, unlike other states in the union, where it's collectively Alaskans own the resources. So we share in the wealth when the development of these resources occurs."

The fact that Alaska issues checks to all its citizens from local oil company profits has been widely reported and was not relevant to today's news until similar words were uttered by Senator Obama to Joe the Plumber in Ohio. What these two stories point out is the importance of word choice when speaking in modern political campaigns.

The context of both Sarah Palin's comment about spreading wealth and Barack Obama's is very important, but the current news cycle is based on short quips. Fortunately for Palin, though Obama made the gaffe more recently, his was the only one reported on because it was in the context of a highly scrutinized national campaign.

So let this be a lesson to anyone planning to run for office: If you plan on saying anything about spreading or sharing wealth, say it now. When the world is watching, the meaning of your words isn't really up to you."

http://www.associatedcontent.com/art...re_in_the.html

Please tell me you're not comparing sharing the royalties from natural resources to "spreading the wealth". Those resources belong to the people of Alaska. How is that the same as taking money directly from one person and handing it to another? And please don't use the lame argument LuveDuke used when she said that people in Florida should get some of that. Here's the difference. When you buy gas, you get something for your money. A product. Not so when Obama takes your tax dollars and "spreads the wealth" to others.
 
It now appears this is a case of mistaken Khalidi identity.

Rashid Khalidi is the founder of the Center for Middle Eastern Studies housed at the University of Chicago.

The Palestinian Center for Policy and Survey Research (CPSR), the group that got the grant from the IRI, is headed up by Ahmad Khalidi, a professor from Cairo.
 
Here's another one that got lost in the shuffle. McCain's running mate is also a hypocrite!

"In August this year, a few weeks before being nominated for vice president, Sarah Palin said in an interview with Philip Gourevitch that Alaska is "set up, unlike other states in the union, where it's collectively Alaskans own the resources. So we share in the wealth when the development of these resources occurs."

The fact that Alaska issues checks to all its citizens from local oil company profits has been widely reported and was not relevant to today's news until similar words were uttered by Senator Obama to Joe the Plumber in Ohio. What these two stories point out is the importance of word choice when speaking in modern political campaigns.

The context of both Sarah Palin's comment about spreading wealth and Barack Obama's is very important, but the current news cycle is based on short quips. Fortunately for Palin, though Obama made the gaffe more recently, his was the only one reported on because it was in the context of a highly scrutinized national campaign.

So let this be a lesson to anyone planning to run for office: If you plan on saying anything about spreading or sharing wealth, say it now. When the world is watching, the meaning of your words isn't really up to you."

http://www.associatedcontent.com/art...re_in_the.html

I posted that info too. The thread was "Is Sarah Palin a socialist" - or something like that. That thread was all but ignored too. It's funny how SP can spread the wealth, brag about it and is called a maverick, but Obama is called a socialist, a communist, and un-American. Wow, the hypocrisy of some of 'my friends' (pun intended via McCain) on Disboards.
 
I posted that info too. The thread was "Is Sarah Palin a socialist" - or something like that. That thread was all but ignored too. It's funny how SP can spread the wealth, brag about it and is called a maverick, but Obama is called a socialist, a communist, and un-American. Wow, the hypocrisy of some of 'my friends' (pun intended via McCain) on Disboards.


What is the definition of a socialist?
 
I posted this information in another thread. I'm sure the Obama Haters (who will soon call him President Obama) just ignored it. They are so busy trying to spear Obama they see how hypocritical McCain is.

Of course they ignored it. Or tried to rationalize "but that's different". :lmao:

NO Say it isn't so John McCain would never do anything like that. Has anyone informed the neocons yet. Has anyone told DawnCt yet???:laughing:

I informed them yesterday. It went over like passing gas in church. :laughing:
 
What is the definition of a socialist?

Modern socialism originated in the late nineteenth-century working class political movement. Karl Marx posited that socialism would be achieved via class struggle and a proletarian revolution which represents the transitional stage between capitalism and communism.[3][4]

Socialists mainly share the belief that capitalism unfairly concentrates power and wealth among a small segment of society that controls capital and creates an unequal society. All socialists advocate the creation of an egalitarian society, in which wealth and power are distributed more evenly, although there is considerable disagreement among socialists over how, and to what extent this could be achieved
.[1]

Sound familiar?
 
Please tell me you're not comparing sharing the royalties from natural resources to "spreading the wealth". Those resources belong to the people of Alaska. How is that the same as taking money directly from one person and handing it to another? And please don't use the lame argument LuveDuke used when she said that people in Florida should get some of that. Here's the difference. When you buy gas, you get something for your money. A product. Not so when Obama takes your tax dollars and "spreads the wealth" to others.

Almost all Oil, Gas drilled and minerals mined in the USA are on Government lands.

Are you saying you support a national windfall tax on energy companies like they had in Alaska?
 
I think it's a noble cause for McCain to help the Palestinian people, who have been oppressed by Isreal for so long.

This was money poorly spent. The Palestinians have been more oppressed by their own government & other Arab states. Of the billions of dollars going to the PA, none of it goes to the people.

Noble is McCain supporting Israel's right to exist in peace and defend itself like any other country should.
 
Almost all Oil, Gas drilled and minerals mined in the USA are on Government lands.

Are you saying you support a national windfall tax on energy companies like they had in Alaska?

No, because the federal government already collects royalties.
 


Disney Vacation Planning. Free. Done for You.
Our Authorized Disney Vacation Planners are here to provide personalized, expert advice, answer every question, and uncover the best discounts. Let Dreams Unlimited Travel take care of all the details, so you can sit back, relax, and enjoy a stress-free vacation.
Start Your Disney Vacation
Disney EarMarked Producer






DIS Facebook DIS youtube DIS Instagram DIS Pinterest DIS Tiktok DIS Twitter

Add as a preferred source on Google

Back
Top Bottom