Looking at SSR with a critical eye.

Status
Not open for further replies.

Daitcher

DIS Veteran
Joined
Jul 11, 2004
Messages
822
All of these post lately like the titled "Why no love for SSR" and others have really gotten me going. Why do we have to fish for nice coments about a resort? Let people call it the way they see it.

I'll start this from the beginning so it might get long. This post isn't an attempt to bash SSR. Everything in here is the truth or at least my opinion. I orginally bought into OKW way back in 1992. I was a young guy with no confidence in my decison making skills. I took the tour, paid the money and went home. I recieved my documents and ended up canceling within the 10 day grace period. A girl I was dating, her father, had sold timeshares in the early part of his career. His advice was to bail why I still could and that ALL timeshares were a scam. Foolishly I listened to that advice, doubting what I knew about OKW and DVC. DVC refunded my money, no questions asked and never tried to convince me otherwise. This showed me a lot about DVC and the confidence they had that the product would sell.

Fast forward to 2002, I now had a family and wanted to purchase DVC. From 1992 - 2002 I also toured BWV at some point when they were selling. I "toured SSR" at BWV. I was shown plans and got to see some model rooms that were set up there. The majority of the tour focused on BWV and other existing DVC Resorts. Really I was told time and again about my ability to book elsewhere at 7 months. Did my guide tell me this because I happened to be staying at BWV at the time? You decide for yourselves. A few of the things that stand out that the guide said about SSR were these quotes: " DVC is really raising the bar with this resort. It will be the finest DVC Resort to date." "We've really listened to the members wants here and the food offerings will rival anything seen at other DVC Resorts." "Gourmet carry out offerings will be available as well as the ususal choices." This is what the members wanted and we've listened." "Think AS Sports food court but much more upscale and much more choices." "You'll get to see fireworks nightly from a waterside viewing area." Obviously he said more than this but this is what I clearly remember. I had full confidence in what I was being told and I knew the program well and had stayed at BWV, BCV and OKW on cash. I expected a resort at least equal to those.

I still love the program but lets look at the shortcomings of SSR only from my perspective. Most of the things I list are fact but some are personal opinions. Theme is the biggest let down for our family. We don't even feel like we are at WDW when at SSR. It is a generic, vanilla resort that really could be anywhere. I live in Saratoga Springs and I can tell you, this town of 26,000 is not worthy of a WDW theme. Nice place to live and grow up ,great summer gambling spot, but not a broad enough appeal to warrant a theme at WDW. They fell short of even doing our town justice as well. A few horse pictures and a bugel playing doesn't constitute a theme. Now, lets forget the lack of ties to a theme park for a second. That in itself was a big mistake and part of the reason that SSR sales have lagged behind. OKW has no direct ties to a park and is isolated. Guess what, I love that tropical, quiet resort. The theme and the peacefull atmosphere help me overlook the other things. I really feel like I'm on vacation there. SSR does nothing for me, period. Better theming, which they blew, would have helper ease the lack of theme park ties. DTD, alone, is not a big enough of a draw to warrant a resort.

Upon returning home from our first SSR trip my wife and mother in law procede to tell me how much they hated the place. HATE was a word they actually used. They said they didn't even feel like they were at WDW. Lets move to my guides promise of the food rivaling anything seen at DVC Resorts. Come on, AP rivals nothing! I would rather have As Sports food court. At least there is some variety. AP is limited, the store is limited for food items, it just stinks as the only option. It would have sufficed if there was poolside dining but guess what there isn't. There is no food poolside. You must go into AP to get food. If you want to eat poolside, good luck becase I believe there is only 3 or 4 sit down tables around the pool. Did DVC envision wet people going inside to eat? What about slippery floors or how inconvenient that is. Should we go back to our rooms and make lunch? I thought resorts encourage people to spend money.

You would think, like I did, that DVC would have learned from each resort they built. They have clealry taken a step backwards here. They should go check out Marriott Grande Vists for an idea on what to do. That resort has a good store with plkenty of food choices. In there you can get really anything you need. They also have a selection of sandwiches that you can grab as well as stuff to order that they will make for you. At the pool they have a huge bar with seating for maybe 30 people. They have maybe 30 tables in front of this, poolside, where you can sit down and eat lunch. Wait people come over and take your order. Why can't DVC get the fact that this is what people want? I can actually get something decent there and not just the Disney fried junk. It gives guests the option to be waited on poolside or grab and take it poolside. We deserve options at any DVC Resort. Also the bar is lively and fun with people mingling. I expected something similiar to this but I was let down. Room service is another area where DVC has dropped the ball. Why not offer it? If food can be deliverd at BCV it can be done anyhwere. The food you order there comes all the way from YC. Room service is something we as a family order maybe once or twice per week long stay. There are just times when eating out is a hassle. It is so nice after a long day to just dial that phone, get in your jammies and wait for the food to be delivered. Kids love this as they can eat in front of the TV or get up and play. How is it fun for a kid to sit in a restaurant? It is a FAMILY vacation right?

When the sit down restaurant is added at SSR they will not offer room service, I've been told. This is ridiculous. Where there is a will, there is a way. I could work it out why can't they? They deliver me food at home from miles away. So much for my guides predictions about the food at SSR. How about his fireworks ploy. Are 5 minutes of fireworks worthy of being a selling point? They really only last that long and aren't that good anyway. SSR loses again. Building a viewing are for that????? :rotfl2:

Now lets get to the expanded size of the resort. DVC's greed is showing here. They expand the resort but don't expand the pool area with it? I don't want to hear about quiet pools either because they get litle use in the big scheme of things. If you want to double or triple the size of the resort then add another theme pool in an out area or expand the original plans. DVC did neither. They are also risking creating a booking nightmare at the smaller DVC Resorts. It is playing out as we speak.

SSR is being sold as a means of getting into the program. The resort isn't good enough on its own to warrant guests staying there consistently. This will put a strain on 7 month bookings. If Dean is correct we might be forced into booking day by day at 7 months. Hey we could always get SSR, right? Wrong because I don't even put it on my list. I'll stay off site first and rent my points to cover it. This project is filled with greed and that is really my biggest gripe. The resort is subpar and will make booking the smaller resorts tough for members. 11 months might be a necessity when SSR is sold out. I book elsewhere at 7 months so I am an offender here. This wouldn't have happened if the resort lived up to my guides billing or even been at the level of the other existing DVC Resorts.

I hope this doesn't make SSR fans or new owners feel bad. That is not my intention at all. As long as you like it that is all that matters. Do some research and start looking at the postings with positive SSR reviews. They come primarily from new owners with little experience with the older DVC Resorts. Is it a nice place? SURE, but it doesn't even hold a candle to the other themes and other DVC Resorts. Those of us that have tried them all seem to be the ones who question this SSR project. DVC as taken a step back with this resort.

Put me in charge and I'll gaurantee you a good resort next time. DVC needs to get out of the office and start looking at resorts from a guest perspective. Start copying good points from Marriott and other timeshares. DVC is too much money to expect anything less. SSR is a big loser in my book.

Thanks for letting me vent and rant here. Sorry I cannot give the resort a smiling face and glowing review. The place stinks and if I can't get 7 month bookings without calling day by day I'll be out of the program.

Here the zipping? That is the flame suit going on. :firefight I shouldn't be flamed because lets face it what can you dispute with this? Most of it is fact with some opinion. Even the Daitcher is entitled to an opinion and this is a public forum.


Special thanks to those who provided me with the inspiration for this thread.


DAVE
 
Well, you made good on your promise of your post. I'm subscribing to see your responses.

I must say that if sales are going the way they are said to be DVC will eventually have to do something to make SSR appeal to more people.

You will get no flames from me on this one. We bought into DVC primarily for the extra 12 years. (there were other reasons but I think people my age need those 12 years, otherwise if they ever have grandkids they won't be seeing much of WDW b/c gran and granp's membership will expire by the time they are of the age to enjoy it)
 
Let me start by saying " GOOD JOB"
I hope DVC managment reads your thread...

I love DVC, I own at 4 resorts, but you hit the nail on the head....
I think DVC missed this one, and will need to fix the problems down the road...

The pool is over crowded, no drink or food near the pool. I vacation to sit by the pool, eta, drink, etc. It is a pain to get dressed walk over to AP, and order food, drinks, etc. and carry it back....

Ok.... I have my flame suit on also... :firefight

I think SSR has the potential to be a FANTASTIC resort, but management need to look at this resort and fix some problems....

Ok...Let me beat you to the punch....I DID NOT want to buy at SSR, but my wife wanted the longer membership years for the kids...That is the only reason we own at SSR.

I do agree that SSR is a beautiful resort...!!! I just think some things need to be looked and fixed!!!
 

well first off, Earls is nice and it's ON-SITE for you SSR people.

With that being said, you bring up some great points.

I have always used the majority of my BWV points at HH. Never had much of a problem getting in. Till 2 years ago. I bought some HH points this week. The point is, unless you WANT to stay at SSR, I suggest to ALL of you, buy where you want to stay from here on out. The days of getting in at other places 5 mths in advance are over. Only one resort will have openings the majority of the time 5 mths out. SSR.........

I guess my concern is, when I bought BWV, i knew that if I didn't plan in advance I would have to stay elsewhere. No problem.......I just stay at ANOTHER great WDW resort. Another resort with a kick@ss pool, great places to eat, a boat ride to a park, ect ect............ well that isn't true if I get "stuck" with SSR. Boooooooooooo to WDW, Boooooooooo to DVC.

Also have any of you thought about what EMH will be in 5 more years? What about ADR? making ADR's 6 mths in advance is crazy. How do i know where I want to eat in Oct?

WDW and DVC keep pouring people into tyhe system, but aren't building up the "system" to support all these new people.

Who knows maybe SSR will have the newest WDW park built right in their back yard. I hope so, that would be great. Until then SSR is a place to HOUSE people, prior to giving them a bus ride to the park in the AM.

Did DVC look at the "extra" 12 years as a way to sell a sub par resort?
 
Very well written. It would be great if you forward this onto DVC and let them know what you think. That will only make things better - hopefully, because if it is about greed and EP comes into play I see a lot of the same complaints about it that are the same as SSR.

I don't mind people saying what they don't like about the resort because there are things I don't like about resorts too. Some of the things that some don't like about SSR, I do like so it works good.

My only dislike is when owners at other resorts lump SSR owners into certain catergories. Things like ALL SSR owners just bought SSR to get into it and have no intention of staying there. Things of that nature.

I have admitted that I will be trying at 7 months to get into other places, but in reality this will be just once because I really really liked SSR, and really am anxious to go back there again.

But I do agree that there are probably some shortfalls for the resort, I mean truely they didn't have to make it sooo big, not that it is bad but I do know that large resorts do tend to turn people off, like CBR for example.

Believe me I totally understand that current owners at older resorts have concern, but I don't think it is as bad as it can be made to sound here. With DVC growing in general these problems were bound to come regardless.
 
Things like ALL SSR owners just bought SSR to get into it and have no intention of staying there.


cobbler for every post you can show me of a non ssr owner talking about staying at ssr, i'll show you 5 post of a ssr owner staying at some place other then ssr.

the truth is on the board.

read the current threads and comments "we own at ssr and think it's great, so far we have stayed at VWL and BCV we hope to stay at SSR someday"
 
Dave, I congratulate your honesty. I expected "over the top", but what I read made sense and I respect your point of view.
I stayed at the former Disney Institute and enjoyed the area and what it had to offer. I have bought at SSR and feel no regrets. My first stay will be this May. My brother and his family stayed in a GV with friends in Nov. He is not a DVC member, he had no preconceived thoughts. He said it was amazing. His wife and kids loved it. They rented a car and had no problems at all. I will rent a car for my first trip and keep tabs on the busses for future refference.
I have stayed at Poly, WL, BWI, serveral moderates and DI. I liked them all. I still think POR has the best landscaping of all of the above. SSR struck me as having that same attention to detail. Maybe I am in the minority, but a great landscaping theme wows me just as much as statues of charaters.
Dave, I wish you luck in your future plans. I hope DVC remains one of them.
 
Thanks for the surpisingly positive comments guys. The post was from the heart and just summed up my feelings about the resort. It isn't a bash thread. I have and will continue to talk with DVC about the issues I have. I started that after my first visit. Well, did it do any good? Who knows but they are adding a sit down restaurant. Vacations should be relaxing and running all over for food isn't my idea of relaxing. For the kind of money to buy into SSR , I don't think drinks and food being served poolside by waiters and waitresses is out of the question. 12 years extra is really the only thing I have to hold on too. B3 made a good point once, maybe I'm the smart one, owning a 3 star resort and trading into 5 start resorts? Thanks again, I'm sure the flames are coming.


DAVE
 
maybe I'm the smart one, owning a 3 star resort and trading into 5 start resorts?


ohhhhhhh I think you are, until it gets to the point where due to large membership #'s booking at 11-7 mths you can no longer stay at a non SSR resort.

Until THAT point, you are IMO the "smart" owner.

As long as you are flexable on dates maybe it will never be a problem.

IMO it will though, and very very soon.
 
boatboatboat said:
Things like ALL SSR owners just bought SSR to get into it and have no intention of staying there.


cobbler for every post you can show me of a non ssr owner talking about staying at ssr, i'll show you 5 post of a ssr owner staying at some place other then ssr.

the truth is on the board.

read the current threads and comments "we own at ssr and think it's great, so far we have stayed at VWL and BCV we hope to stay at SSR someday"


Oh I am sure that is the case HERE on the boards. But we are just a very few skewed % of people that own at SSR.

Another reason I posted the poll on SSR, seems as though a lot has changed in a year since it was polled last.

Also - serious legit questions. Why is one of the items that makes SSR "good" and not "great" - or whatever - is the lack of room service when OKW doesn't have room service and there aren't any gripes on that?

Why is one of the other items that makes SSR "good" and not "great" is the lack of valet when OKW doesn't have it either and there aren't any gripes on that?

Why is one of the other items that makes SSR "good" and not "great" is the fact that it has exterior hallways when OKW has exterior hallways and there aren't any gripes on that?

Why is one of the other items that makes SSR "good" and not "great" is the lack of being close to a park when OKW isn't close to a park and there aren't any gripes on that?


Seriously, I am really trying to understand why its bad for SSR and not OKW. I would honestly appreciate an explanation. Is it because OKW was the first? Or is it because it requires fewer points so it can be tolerated for such cheap points? Would the complaints be there if SSR's points were on the same line as OKW? I just don't understand.
 
boatboatboat said:
IMO it will though, and very very soon.


In all honesty it will be. People can tell me I'm wrong all they want to, but I feel it in my bones that a CR and an AKL DVC are coming. The minute they open up sales, things are going to get even harder. I'm not going to stroke my own ego and say "oh SSR, I'll always stay there b/c its the best! :rolleyes: " Nope, the moment one of those resorts opens I'm bailing on my 2 SSR contracts and become a convert to one of those 2 resorts. If I don't, I'll never get to try either of them b/c they will be full of all sorts of DVC owners and if I ever need to rent my points for any reason it will be a hard sell b/c those renters will be looking for the folks that own those CR and AKL points. Thats just my 2 cents.
 
I would also never stay at OKW as a family vacation. I do plan on staying there with just my wife, for some old folks time.........

I guess my gripe is, IMO people where sold SSR as a way to stay at "better" resorts. That sucks........

WDW should make SSR the BEST, make it the place of choice.

Don't build 300 units at a GREAT resort, and then build 800 at a "good" resort and tell those folks, well ya can stay over there, if ya get lucky.......

Wouldn't it be great if the discussion here was BWV and BCV and VWL owners trying to wait list for SSR? Everyone was talking about the monorail from SSR to the Epcot Monorail distrubution center. People were going on and on about the SSR grounds, people were bragging about the SSR ADR's they were able to make, kids were screaming at mom and dad begging to stay at SSR cuz of the on site water park. Why didn't DVC build all of us a NEW RESORT like that?
 
cobbler said:
Oh I am sure that is the case HERE on the boards. But we are just a very few skewed % of people that own at SSR.

Another reason I posted the poll on SSR, seems as though a lot has changed in a year since it was polled last.

Also - serious legit questions. Why is one of the items that makes SSR "good" and not "great" - or whatever - is the lack of room service when OKW doesn't have room service and there aren't any gripes on that?

Why is one of the other items that makes SSR "good" and not "great" is the lack of valet when OKW doesn't have it either and there aren't any gripes on that?

Why is one of the other items that makes SSR "good" and not "great" is the fact that it has exterior hallways when OKW has exterior hallways and there aren't any gripes on that?

Why is one of the other items that makes SSR "good" and not "great" is the lack of being close to a park when OKW isn't close to a park and there aren't any gripes on that?


Seriously, I am really trying to understand why its bad for SSR and not OKW. I would honestly appreciate an explanation. Is it because OKW was the first? Or is it because it requires fewer points so it can be tolerated for such cheap points? Would the complaints be there if SSR's points were on the same line as OKW? I just don't understand.



Cobbler, your posts are so well thought out. Your questions are good ones and I tried to answer that in my thread a little. I'll tolerate things at OKW that I won't tolerate at SSR for a few reasons. OKW was the first DVC Resort. At that time they were new to this thing. SSR is how many resort later?, 5 or 6. They should have upped the game not gone backwards. Also OKW is just so beautiful, it is like a neighborhood and it feels like you are on vacation. I would stay there if it was located elsewhere. The low points are another reason. Lower points means lower expectations. Also OKW has food by the pool, food by turtle pond area, and a sit down restaurant. SSR could be fixed but for now it deserves a critical eye. I would never stay at SSR if it was located elsewhere. Sometimes the resorts need to be judged by themselves.


DAVE
 
sajetto said:
In all honesty it will be. People can tell me I'm wrong all they want to, but I feel it in my bones that a CR and an AKL DVC are coming. The minute they open up sales, things are going to get even harder. I'm not going to stroke my own ego and say "oh SSR, I'll always stay there b/c its the best! :rolleyes: " Nope, the moment one of those resorts opens I'm bailing on my 2 SSR contracts and become a convert to one of those 2 resorts. If I don't, I'll never get to try either of them b/c they will be full of all sorts of DVC owners and if I ever need to rent my points for any reason it will be a hard sell b/c those renters will be looking for the folks that own those CR and AKL points. Thats just my 2 cents.



You are right on with this. I might very well sell my SSR and own a more desirable resort that is tough to get into. Why would anyone rent SSR points other than to get a GV? There is always empty rooms there.


DAVE
 
Well Dave hopefully these are things that SSR can work out and take the kinks out of it. Hopefully with critical eye it will only make the resort a better place.

I kind of look at SSR like a clumsy teenager. It needs time to go up and come into its own. I guess only time will tell. There is power in numbers and when the new SSR owners get a few DVC stays under their belt, either at SSR, other resorts or a combo of both, their concerns WILL be listened too and can only make it better.

You know I thought of something, with so many people trading into OKW because of fewer points (I am sure it happens a lot) DVC probably thought that is what the people wanted, something similar to OKW and so that is how they went about SSR. Who knows?? Maybe it was cost? Maybe it was greed, make something like OKW, make it bigger and get the masses in? Who knows really.

I don't mind critical eyes on a resort at all. There are resorts I don't like. CBR is last on my list as a moderate. I dislike the values very very much. Others love the values, it doesn't make them bad. It's not bad to dislike a resort. What miffs me is when the dislikes start to fall over into the owners of that resort. The SSR owners this and the SSR owners that. Those things aren't necessary.
 
Not trying to fan any flames here, but as a fairly new DVC owner (we bought in January, 2005, at SSR, sight unseen), I just have to wonder, did any of the other resorts get this kind of bad press when they opened? When VWL opened, was it immediately an awsome place to stay, and no one had any complaints? How about BCV and BWV?

I understand the reasoning that SSR should be "better" (NOT my words!) because it is the newest DVC resort, but does it just need a chance to grow and age like other DVC resorts?

Again, not trying to stir the pot anymore than is happening, but I'm confused that the general opinion is that ALL other DVC resorts were awesome upon opening, and SSR, for lack of a better word, sucks.
 
No flames from me. As I tried to express in the other thread my complaint was not about your opinions but the way they were expressed in that thread.
I do agree poolside food would be a nice option. And I'm glad the restaurant is being added. I think this resort is still a work in progress and there is certainly always potential for improvement.

I don't agree that positive SSR reviews have only come from people who have never experienced other DVCs; that's just not true.

I really think DVC thought it was time for another condo-style resort in the style of OKW, and that not everyone necessarily prefers hotel-style resorts. I do find it interesting that OKW escapes some of the vitriol that SSR receives. OKW of course does have the bigger rooms and lower point value, but while SSR isn't as low points as OKW (or BWV standard) it is lower than the other resort-style DVC.)
 
Status
Not open for further replies.














DIS Facebook DIS youtube DIS Instagram DIS Pinterest DIS Tiktok DIS Twitter DIS Bluesky

Back
Top Bottom