fitzperry
DIS Veteran
- Joined
- Jul 9, 2005
- Messages
- 2,006
So I really want a long, fast zoom, but I really can't afford one right now. I check Craigslist regularly hoping for a good deal but rarely see anything that interests me.
Well, over the weekend there was a listing for a Nikon 80-200 2.8d. As many of you know, in good condition these typically go for around $700-$800 or more on eBay. KEH currently has one in "BGN" condition listed for $751. This guy was asking $350, which naturally raised a few red flags. But in doing some research, I discovered the same person had listed the lens on eBay with an opening bid of $400. He claimed to be the original owner and that the lens was in perfect optical condition. Had the box, tripod mount, etc. but no lens hood. He received no bids, likely because he had only 1 feedback, though I was still pretty surprised by the lack of interest. Anyway, while I was trading voicemails with the seller to arrange a meeting so I could look at the lens, someone evidently jumped in and just said he'd take it.
And lo and behold, today there's a nice listing on Craigslist for my area for a Nikon 80-200 2.8d for $850. I'd bet $850 this guy bought that lens for around $350 last Sunday. In the pictures for the two listings you can see that the box is bent a bit in the same place. And the thing that really gets me is that part of the reason for my hesitation is that I was feeling a bit guilty at the prospect of paying so little for a lens I know to be worth more. At least I would've put it to good use instead of trying to turn a profit on it.
Thanks for letting me rant! Somehow this only worsens my NAS.
And the ethical question . . . . is it wrong to buy something at a bargain basement price under circumstances like these when you know it's probably worth considerably more? Is it more wrong to do the same thing and then just turn around and sell it?
Well, over the weekend there was a listing for a Nikon 80-200 2.8d. As many of you know, in good condition these typically go for around $700-$800 or more on eBay. KEH currently has one in "BGN" condition listed for $751. This guy was asking $350, which naturally raised a few red flags. But in doing some research, I discovered the same person had listed the lens on eBay with an opening bid of $400. He claimed to be the original owner and that the lens was in perfect optical condition. Had the box, tripod mount, etc. but no lens hood. He received no bids, likely because he had only 1 feedback, though I was still pretty surprised by the lack of interest. Anyway, while I was trading voicemails with the seller to arrange a meeting so I could look at the lens, someone evidently jumped in and just said he'd take it.

And lo and behold, today there's a nice listing on Craigslist for my area for a Nikon 80-200 2.8d for $850. I'd bet $850 this guy bought that lens for around $350 last Sunday. In the pictures for the two listings you can see that the box is bent a bit in the same place. And the thing that really gets me is that part of the reason for my hesitation is that I was feeling a bit guilty at the prospect of paying so little for a lens I know to be worth more. At least I would've put it to good use instead of trying to turn a profit on it.
Thanks for letting me rant! Somehow this only worsens my NAS.
And the ethical question . . . . is it wrong to buy something at a bargain basement price under circumstances like these when you know it's probably worth considerably more? Is it more wrong to do the same thing and then just turn around and sell it?


...just let me first state that i am the type of person who tells the cashier she undercharged me so i probably would have asked the first seller if he was sure on the price he was asking but..
)
It's not that I think someone shouldn't do their homework before selling something. But this is just something I wouldn't do.
But maybe the original seller knew about that fungus and knew what he was doing all along, and the hypocrite is going to have an angry buyer on his hands when the latent defect is finally uncovered.