Before our trip last week I was in the you shouldn't do it during shows group. Now I completely understand the need for WOC. Disney needs to do something about the viewing area. I didn't put my DD on my shoulders but I did hold her at my height so she could see and I was miserable trying to hold a 40 lb child for 25 minutes at the end of a long day. There were several parents with kids on their shoulders and I'm sorry but next time I'm going to be one of them. I am 6 ft tall and I couldn't see everything myself. DW swears shes going on rides next time instead of trying to watch WOC because she couldn't see much of anything. The only chance a child has to see the show without getting one of the very few spots by the rails is to be on a parents shoulders.
I wish they did WOC more like F! (I can't believe I'm saying that). But we have found it MUCH easier to get a good spot for F! than for WOC. I can understand people deciding that if they have to decide between their child seeing the show and possibly blocking part of others views or they keep the view clear and their kid can't see the show its not a hard choice for me. The only part that bothers me about that is that Disney has it set up so that people have to make that choice. Not everyone is able to find a prime spot so no matter what people are going to end up with a bad spot and terrible view. IMO its up to Disney to fix the problem and until they do I think it's not only appropriate for kids to be up on parents shoulders during WOC it's necessary.
"Not everyone is able to find a prime spot so no matter what people are going to end up with a bad spot and terrible view."
Just highlighting that sentence because it is the crux of "the devil's advocate" tact I'm taking.
Like Coaches24 once was, I am someone who has not gone to DLR yet with my kids and totally understand and nod along when people think that shoulders should not be used for parades, WOC, etc. But I also understand the idea that it's a situation where *someone* is not going to get to see the show. So when you say, "My kid can't see. Take your kid down," you're also effectively saying, "Your kid won't be allowed to see the show so my kid can." You're saying, "Make me happy by making someone else unhappy." Given the unfortunate fact that some people will have an obstructed view, I'm not convinced that the "fairest" thing is for the youngest and shortest people to be those people who do not get to see.
Are you willing to tell people over, say, 6' that they can't take the prime areas along the rail for WOC or be on the curb for the parades because they'll be blocking so many others' views? If not, what is the big difference for someone made "tall" by being on someone's shoulders? From what some have said, some of the issue is that it comes as a surprise. You think you have one type of view, and then when the show starts, you suddenly have a different view because an adult adds a child that you did not realize would happen. But I don't demonize the people who are trying to help someone small see.
I know that at some shows, CMs will support those who find kids on shoulders unacceptable, so you have that official approval, but that doesn't convince me that it isn't still a raw deal for the people who can't otherwise see if they're not on shoulders. (Especially at WOC where it sounds like so few people, short or tall, really get to see the show properly.) You fix one person's problem by creating one for someone else. (An argument that of course applies in the direction of the people hoisting kids up as much as it does for people insisting they come down.) There just seems to be no acknowledgement of how, no matter what happens, there is always someone left unhappy, someone who was just as excited to see the show, who waited as long or longer (After all, they're in front of you, right? So they might have gotten there by arriving before you did and waiting even longer.), and who are just as disappointed when they can't see.
I wish I had a solution that helped everyone.