Jon and Kate Plus 8 Official Thread - Part 8

Status
Not open for further replies.
Kate is always saying that everything that she does is for her children. I don't buy it. Kate's personality seems to be one that craves the attention.

She says that they need the money. Again, I don't buy it. What can she possibly be spending that much money on? $20,000 from Jon breaks down to $625 per child a WEEK! The kids are in school a good portion of the day so it's not like she's paying for daycare all day long.

Kate loves being in the spotlight. There are plenty of other large families out there that don't have nearly as much income as Kate is claiming that she needs.
 
I read more from than one source (source meaning website, not source meaning unnamed person, LOL) yesterday that November was the first that money was set aside for the children. We know that were other accounts, because Jon & Kate fought over them, but they were all accounts that could have been touched with "good" (in the eye of the behold, I think) reason. The skepticism over what's been put aside for the children will always be a part of this story, at least it will for me.
But we don't know that they haven't put aside money for the kids either. They both said they did..although Jon did say they could use that money if they needed to. That is not good.


I'm not sure I follow and may have missed something .. who has put money aside for Jon's child support?
Someone on this thread said earlier that that was part of the deal..that some of Jon's money has been put aside. I thought I also read that Jon's lawyer said that once that money was gone, Jon couldn't afford the support.

I believe Kate's lawyer will make darn sure (as well he should!) that Jon is paying support until the children are 18. Will it be $20,000/month? That's for the court to decide, but I do think that Jon will be paying child support for the next 12 years.
You can't get blood from a stone. Ask any of the single mom's still waiting for their support. Once his money and 15 minutes are up, I would be surprised if there was support given.


I don't think Kate thinks her 15 minutes will be over soon, though.

Do you think that she's working and saving so she can be a SAHM when the 15 minutes are up? That just occured to me, LOL.
I don't think she is that stupid, to think she can earn enough to stay at home full time, but if she saves enough, perhaps she won't have to work long long hours to keep the kids and her going. I agree she doesn't think her 15 will be up soon..but I still hope she is really saving for their futures, in addition to the money they had to put aside from the actual show.

I read yesterday reports that she's not letting Jon stay there while she's gone .. no idea if that's true or not.
I have no idea..just that one snippet that day from Jon saying he was spending a lot of time with the kids, and the pictures from Easter with him at the house.
 
So, they would be better off in public school and having mom work as a nurse? Do you really think she would be with the kids more if so? Do you really think she could get a job working the hours the kids are in school (the hours most nurses would like to get that have more senority than Kate would have) and would be home when they get home, and would get to spend the evening with them, rather than having to either work nights and pay a sitter full time, or afternoons and not be with them? Not in this area. If she could even find someone to hire her after all that has happened.
I'm not sure that would be better for the children's well-being. They appear to be very well cared for (and I bet she is paying sitters even when the kids are in school, if they are live-in). She does spend time with them..she hasn't just fallen off the face of the earth. Like you said, they are in school.

There's a big difference between providing for your children and maintaining a very lavish lifestyle at the expense of the children's well-being. Does anyone here think that TLC will want a nice, normal non-drama format for either of the new shows? So with that said, I think that to bring in the ratings there will be some element of controversy with the new shows and I believe that the kids well being will be compromised yet again.
 
Kate is always saying that everything that she does is for her children. I don't buy it. Kate's personality seems to be one that craves the attention.

She says that they need the money. Again, I don't buy it. What can she possibly be spending that much money on? $20,000 from Jon breaks down to $625 per child a WEEK! The kids are in school a good portion of the day so it's not like she's paying for daycare all day long.

Kate loves being in the spotlight. There are plenty of other large families out there that don't have nearly as much income as Kate is claiming that she needs.

ITA.

Goodness I don't know how DH and I did it. 7 kids (helped put the oldest ones through college), me a SAHM, Disney vacations and all without a reality based tv show!!!

Guess that's why we're still married! Of course if I was as demanding and controlling as Kate I'm sure we wouldn't still be married.

I am sick to death of Kate saying how she does everything for the kids. IMHO she loves being a "celebrity". If she wasn't trying to be on tv all the time (DWTS, The View, etc) the paps would have been long gone.
 

And that is how you chose to live your life. Just because other's chose differently, it doesn't make either of you wrong. I chose to work. I did that partly to comfortably help with the expense of putting my children in private school, go on vacations, etc. I also did it (and prob more so) because I loved working. I can't even imagine bing a sahm. It would so not be me. Doesn't mean I loved my children any less. I loved them to pieces. Different things for different people. We helped put three kids through college and helped them get started in life. Because we wanted to. I also felt a need to. And that was my choice.


ITA.

Goodness I don't know how DH and I did it. 7 kids (helped put the oldest ones through college), me a SAHM, Disney vacations and all without a reality based tv show!!!

Guess that's why we're still married! Of course if I was as demanding and controlling as Kate I'm sure we wouldn't still be married.
 
ITA.

Goodness I don't know how DH and I did it. 7 kids (helped put the oldest ones through college), me a SAHM, Disney vacations and all without a reality based tv show!!!

Guess that's why we're still married! Of course if I was as demanding and controlling as Kate I'm sure we wouldn't still be married.

I am sick to death of Kate saying how she does everything for the kids. IMHO she loves being a "celebrity". If she wasn't trying to be on tv all the time (DWTS, The View, etc) the paps would have been long gone.

I agree. :thumbsup2
 
Uhhh, no! No nurse would ever work six 12 hour days a week. That would be an 'untruth'. Did they mention the 20,000 a month she gets from Jon?

I am reading Kate told a few other lies during this interview. Did you catch any? She claimed Jodi and Kevin haven't seen the kids in 2 years and we have pictures of a reunion with Jon from oct 09, and that they sold stories to the tabloids while they (jodi and kevin) were still on the show. I didn't see the interview, I am reading comments about it, so if anyone here saw let us know.

She said Kevin and Jodi has not seen the kids in 2 years. Kate don't read the tabloids, so maybe she don't know that Jon let them see the kids.

She told Joyce or is it Joy that she is not a DIVA on DWTS. The DWTS is like her big extended family and friends, she loves them all. I was really hoping Joyce would ask her about her parents and grandparents and why does she feel these people are her only friends and family-but she only asked about her brother Kevin.

She said Kevin and Jody made money off of her kids and her family. She said Kevin's money most have run out and that is why he is talking again.

She said the kids want to know when they can go on an airplane again, and she and the kids have a big vacation coming up, that will be a shown, as a special this summer. She said she and the kids are really excited and can't wait. So I presume as soon as school lets out, they will be filming again.
 
Here's a question for everyone:

What would Jon and Kate have done without being picked up for the TV series?

I think that they would both be working as much as possible and have long standing relationships with their family and friends that were otherwise discarded. They would be in a modest home and grateful for what they have (healthy children) and not what they need.
 
I agree that we don't see her squandering money.... because she gets so many freebies?
Who pays for her hair extensions, clothing and bodyguard? What about vacations? Do the kids really go to private school? Who actually pays for the childcare? I think there's a lot more to their financial situation that is unclear.

I am of the belief that where there's a will, there's a way. In the current economic downturn, I believe most families would agree that certain extravagances need to be re-evaluated. Why is she above doing the same? I think she is making a mockery of her fans who so dutifully vote for her on DWTS and buy her books.

I agree, where there is a will there is a way...and Kate's way is to do DWTS and write a book. I truly don't understand what is wrong with that. :confused3 No matter how she got where she is now, it is where she is. Yes, her "fame" has come from having kids and a reality show that featured the kids. Maybe that wasn't the best choice, but it's done now, can't go back in time, so Kate is capitalizing on that, at this point, I don't see anything wrong with that. Could she be home with the kids more? Yes. But is that not true for many, many, many parents??? It's like she is the only parent on the planet that could/should quit their job, move to a smaller house and spend more time with her kids. It baffles me when people are so adamant that Kate should go back to nursing. Why? Personally I think it's unrealistic, but I don't doubt she would if had to.
 
Just a few comments:

--Didn't we find out that the new house is not in Jon or Kate's name but it was bought by TLC?

--I really don't give a crap what Kate does in her life or with her kids if she would just STOP going on tv and saying it's all for the kids!! The hair, tanning, high heels, is not for the kids. She could go on tv without going soo excessive. Why not get a plain old hairdo, she could wear nice clothes without breaking the bank. That's what really bugs me about her. She's just gotten soo phony.
 
They would have lived a different life. But it was picked up, so it's a moot point. All of our lives could have been different if....

I don't know if they would have had more of a relationship with their families than they have now. I thought those started to break up before the show. We'll never know those answers. Do I think they would still be together? Nope, I think the arguing about lack of money (just like with many people who are married) would have done them in long before this.

I read the Dis and Dear Abby..there are a lot of people who don't get along with theri families.

Here's a question for everyone:

What would Jon and Kate have done without being picked up for the TV series?

I think that they would both be working as much as possible and have long standing relationships with their family and friends that were otherwise discarded. They would be in a modest home and grateful for what they have (healthy children) and not what they need.
 
I agree, where there is a will there is a way...and Kate's way is to do DWTS and write a book. I truly don't understand what is wrong with that. :confused3 No matter how she got where she is now, it is where she is. Yes, her "fame" has come from having kids and a reality show that featured the kids. Maybe that wasn't the best choice, but it's done now, can't go back in time, so Kate is capitalizing on that, at this point, I don't see anything wrong with that. Could she be home with the kids more? Yes. But is that not true for many, many, many parents??? It's like she is the only parent on the planet that could/should quit their job, move to a smaller house and spend more time with her kids. It baffles me when people are so adamant that Kate should go back to nursing. Why? Personally I think it's unrealistic, but I don't doubt she would if had to.


I don't think she should go back to nursing at all, what patient would want her around and what doctor would put up with her controlling ways.

What I disagree with is the fact that she is playing the pity me card for all to see and making it seem like she and the kids are a day away from being homeless. They made a lot of money with the show, personal appearances and books. In this day and age with the economy the way it is and the fact that she is divorced makes no impact on her whatsoever. She comes across like she shouldn't have to make any sacrifices to her new lifestyle, that is the part that bothers me.

Someone upthread mentioned that her brother made $30K off of their story. That is a drop in the bucket to Kate and yet she acted like it was life changing money. No what is life changing money is what she has going on right now, DWTS, her book, and the 2 new shows coming this summer. All the while Jon is blocked from doing media oriented work that would essentially bring him large paychecks as well. Go figure...
 
The hair, tanning, high heels, is not for the kids. She could go on tv without going soo excessive. Why not get a plain old hairdo, she could wear nice clothes without breaking the bank. That's what really bugs me about her. She's just gotten soo phony.
Is she paying for her own clothes? Or her hair? I assume she was paying for the tanning, but then Tony went with her (and I think they spray them on DWTS)..maybe she isn't even paying for that. At one time, it gave credit to people at the end of their show, that covered those things. Is she breaking the bank even if she is paying for those items?

As for the house..I thought at one time TLC said they would pay for part of it, since they film there, and the camera people could stay in the guest house, but I haven't seen that posted again since. Was it paid for through a lawyer? I can't remember, but I don't think it was TLC.
 
And that is how you chose to live your life. Just because other's chose differently, it doesn't make either of you wrong. I chose to work. I did that partly to comfortably help with the expense of putting my children in private school, go on vacations, etc. I also did it (and prob more so) because I loved working. I can't even imagine bing a sahm. It would so not be me. Doesn't mean I loved my children any less. I loved them to pieces. Different things for different people. We helped put three kids through college and helped them get started in life. Because we wanted to. I also felt a need to. And that was my choice.

Well I am very lucky that DH works very hard and we are able to send our children to private schools also. No one said that because a mother works she loves her children any less. It gets old when Kate chooses to put her life (and the kids) out in the pubic, goes around saying how it's all for the kids, complains about the paps, but does everything she can to put her life out there for all to see.

If she really didn't want to do that there are plenty of things she could do -including stopping all the extravagances and settling for a smaller house - other than plaster herself all over tv.
 
There's a big difference between providing for your children and maintaining a very lavish lifestyle at the expense of the children's well-being. Does anyone here think that TLC will want a nice, normal non-drama format for either of the new shows? So with that said, I think that to bring in the ratings there will be some element of controversy with the new shows and I believe that the kids well being will be compromised yet again.

I totally agree.

By the looks of it they will have to be a lot more careful how they film the kids in the future. This article clarifies yesterday's Hearing and the outcome of the Dept of Labor investigation outcome somewhat. I've bolded some bits for emphasis -- LOL at the "product placement in some episodes" bit.


http://www.philly.com/inquirer/ente...ate__kids_need_work_permits__trust_funds.html

Pa. says 'Jon & Kate' kids need work permits, trust funds
By Angela Couloumbis and Amy Worden

Inquirer Harrisburg Bureau

HARRISBURG - The reality-TV show Jon & Kate Plus 8 has gotten a dose of real reality, courtesy of the State of Pennsylvania.

In a letter that became public Wednesday, state Department of Labor and Industry officials said child-labor permits should have been obtained for Jon and Kate Gosselin's eight children, who appeared regularly on the now-canceled TLC show watched by millions.

The letter also said no legal action would be taken against the show's producers - as long as 15 percent of the show's proceeds were salted away in a trust fund for the Gosselins' 9-year-old twins and 5-year-old sextuplets. Labor officials also ordered that permits be obtained for any future filming.

"It is our opinion that they should have been 'permitted,' " Labor and Industry spokesman Troy Thompson said of the children.


Despite that finding, he said the investigation "did not turn up any evidence that there were transgressions of the requirements for how child performers should be treated."

The letter from Harrisburg happened to surface on the day Kate Gosselin's relatives were telling state legislators meeting in Horsham that the show had become a profit-driven "circus."

Replying to written questions about the state's letter, Laurie Goldberg, a spokeswoman for Discovery Talent Services and TLC, said Wednesday that the trust fund had been established, and that the amount placed in it exceeded 15 percent of the show's gross proceeds.

She also said that "our formal position is that [permits] are not required as a matter of law, but as part of the resolution we agreed to obtain permits."

In general, Pennsylvania labor law allows children younger than 16 to work in the entertainment industry as long as child-labor permits are obtained.

Also, certain rules must be followed. For instance, children can't be made to work past 11:30 p.m.

In the Gosselins' case, the department received a complaint last summer against the show, which was filmed primarily in the couple's home in Elizabethtown, Lancaster County, and later in Wernersville, Berks County, after the couple moved there. State officials declined to say when the complaint was filed or who filed it.

One of the fundamental questions, state officials said, was whether reality television was subject to child labor laws.

According to information that TLC provided to the state, filming generally occurred two or three times a week for four to six hours each time. On school nights, filming wrapped up at 7.

The state's letter notes that DVDs and other merchandise involving the children were sold, and that there was product placement in some episodes. All of that figured in officials' conclusion that the Gosselin children were employees under Pennsylvania law.

So did the children's frequent appearances in the show, the direction they sometimes received, and the fact that their parents were paid for the family's participation.

As the show's armies of fans know, the Gosselins have since divorced. Kate Gosselin, who has custody of the children, competes on ABC's Dancing With the Stars and has another reality television show in the works. Jon Gosselin has had legal squabbles with TLC and has retained a Delaware County lawyer to, among other things, revisit the children's custody arrangement.

Then there are the relatives. Kate Gosselin's brother and sister-in-law were testifying Wednesday at a legislative committee meeting in Horsham examining the state's child labor laws.

The two told legislators that those laws needed updating to reflect the advent of reality television and the Internet.

"These children deserve the same legal protection and ethical safeguards provided to children involved in scripted television production," an emotional Jodi Kreider, who is married to Kate Gosselin's brother, Kevin Kreider, told legislators.

The Kreiders, who were neighbors of the Gosselins in Wernersville, participated in the early episodes of the TLC show until, they said, what began as an innocent documentary about family life turned into a "circus."

Kevin Kreider said he was particularly concerned about 24/7 video cameras in the children's bedrooms, filming of toilet training with full nudity, and lack of adult supervision during filming.

He said episodes showing the children's private moments were not only on TV, but also are posted on the Internet for all to see.

State Rep. Thomas Murt (R., Montgomery) said he planned to introduce legislation to revise Pennsylvania's child labor code to reflect concerns raised in the hearing. He said the state code needed new curbs on hours and working conditions, and language to ensure that children in reality shows are compensated.

Murt said that he was disappointed that the findings of the agency charged with overseeing children in the workplace had not been made public until Wednesday's hearing, and that "despite numerous violations to code, no one was being cited" in connection with the show.

Thompson, the spokesman for the Labor and Industry Department, said the department, too, was working to revamp child labor laws - in part to reflect the advent of reality TV and the Internet.

 
[/B]

I don't think she should go back to nursing at all, what patient would want her around and what doctor would put up with her controlling ways.
I was thinking more, that they wouldn't want the paps around.

What I disagree with is the fact that she is playing the pity me card for all to see and making it seem like she and the kids are a day away from being homeless. They made a lot of money with the show, personal appearances and books. In this day and age with the economy the way it is and the fact that she is divorced makes no impact on her whatsoever. She comes across like she shouldn't have to make any sacrifices to her new lifestyle, that is the part that bothers me.
I don't get the idea that she is saying they are a day away form being homeless. I always get the idea that she wants to work while she can to have money for the future. I guess it depends if you dislike her intensly or not. And I'm not sure that she has a new lifestyle that she has to make sacrifices for yet.

Someone upthread mentioned that her brother made $30K off of their story. That is a drop in the bucket to Kate and yet she acted like it was life changing money. No what is life changing money is what she has going on right now, DWTS, her book, and the 2 new shows coming this summer. All the while Jon is blocked from doing media oriented work that would essentially bring him large paychecks as well. Go figure...

I don't think it was the amount of money. I never thought she acted like it was life changing..except the life between her and her brother. I think it was the fact that she feels her brother sold her out. So do I. I think she was hurt that he sold her out, and if it's what you would consider a drop in the bucket..it's even worse. He was on the show when the stuff he is now saying happened. If he felt so strongly, he should have done something at the time. Jodi's sister certainly posted enough about the family..she must have gotten that from Jodi.

Jon should have thought about that before he signed the contract, and before he threatened to remove the kids if he couldn't get his own way. Production companies are pretty big on enforcing contracts. I think Jon is done in May,so he can go out and get media work and a large paycheck next month. I'm looking forward to that.
 
They would have lived a different life. But it was picked up, so it's a moot point. All of our lives could have been different if....

I don't know if they would have had more of a relationship with their families than they have now. I thought those started to break up before the show. We'll never know those answers. Do I think they would still be together? Nope, I think the arguing about lack of money (just like with many people who are married) would have done them in long before this.

I read the Dis and Dear Abby..there are a lot of people who don't get along with theri families.

You're right it is a moot point but certainly something worth considering since we all have very drastic impressions of what is going on with her. She comes across to me as selfish and self-centered. Do you think the kids care about what size house they have? What label the clothes are that are on their backs? I seriously think the kids would go back to the simpler days if it meant a more normal life for them without all the drama and chaos.
 
You're right it is a moot point but certainly something worth considering since we all have very drastic impressions of what is going on with her. She comes across to me as selfish and self-centered. Do you think the kids care about what size house they have? What label the clothes are that are on their backs? I seriously think the kids would go back to the simpler days if it meant a more normal life for them without all the drama and chaos.

We all have drastic impressions, but even we can't agree if they are good or bad. And someone is voting for her. You can't make me believe that it's all the people who don't like her.

I have no idea if the kids would be happier not filming and not doing lots of really nice trips and having a smaller house without all that land. I'll have to wait for the book. I'm sure Maddy's will be the first one out.
 
I don't get the idea that she is saying they are a day away form being homeless. I always get the idea that she wants to work while she can to have money for the future. I guess it depends if you dislike her intensly or not. And I'm not sure that she has a new lifestyle that she has to make sacrifices for yet.


I don't think it was the amount of money. I never thought she acted like it was life changing..except the life between her and her brother. I think it was the fact that she feels her brother sold her out. So do I. I think she was hurt that he sold her out, and if it's what you would consider a drop in the bucket..it's even worse. He was on the show when the stuff he is now saying happened. If he felt so strongly, he should have done something at the time. Jodi's sister certainly posted enough about the family..she must have gotten that from Jodi.

You seem to be truly optimistic of Kate's intentions and what she MAY be doing with the money, I am not. I don't get the impression AT ALL that she is thinking of the future. I think any sacrifices made now will only lend itself to helping in the future.


She said last night on Joy Behar that he made hundreds of thousands and now it has run out so she was focused on the money part not the betrayal
 
We all have drastic impressions, but even we can't agree if they are good or bad. And someone is voting for her. You can't make me believe that it's all the people who don't like her.

I have no idea if the kids would be happier not filming and not doing lots of really nice trips and having a smaller house without all that land. I'll have to wait for the book. I'm sure Maddy's will be the first one out.

Maybe there's no need to save any money for the kids college because each of them can just write a book and I agree Mady will be leading the way.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

New Posts


Disney Vacation Planning. Free. Done for You.
Our Authorized Disney Vacation Planners are here to provide personalized, expert advice, answer every question, and uncover the best discounts. Let Dreams Unlimited Travel take care of all the details, so you can sit back, relax, and enjoy a stress-free vacation.
Start Your Disney Vacation
Disney EarMarked Producer






DIS Facebook DIS youtube DIS Instagram DIS Pinterest DIS Tiktok DIS Twitter

Add as a preferred source on Google

Back
Top Bottom