Jodi Arias Trial Part 3, STILL in redirect of Jodi, Mar 5

[Beulah]

Here we go with JA introducing KY.
Defense will claim it was cuz Travis hurt her so during A-sex

 

[MaryAnnDVC]

For crying out loud, talk about beating a dead horse. Maybe Nurmi should join the DIS - he'd fit right in on the CB.

Two kinky people, having kinky sex, taking kinky pictures, DIDN'T take pictures of the kinky tying up part?

 

[Uncle Remus]

For crying out loud, talk about beating a dead horse. Maybe Nurmi should join the DIS - he'd fit right in on the CB.

You are correct.

I don't remember much though maybe I heard it but I am a little foggy about that....

No, no, we can't lose you.

 

[BearcatsFan]

Two kinky people, having kinky sex, taking kinky pictures, DIDN'T take pictures of the kinky tying up part?

My thoughts exactly. Goodness knows she recorded everything else for posterity, why not the tied-up photos, too. They may have wanted to look at them later.

 

[BearcatsFan]

Anddd now we're back to talking about sex again.

 

[usnuzuloose]

Uh, did she not use that with other people?

 

[MaryAnnDVC]

I'm trying to play spider solitaire and listen but that still isn't enough. I seriously need some caffeine.

I'm doing jigzone puzzles.

Every man out there watching this wishes they could be as persuasive as Travis Alexander apparently was.

 

[BearcatsFan]

She didn't want to say no because she was in love and she would have had sex anytime he wanted to. Therefore people, it isn't abuse. Plain and simple.

 

[crz4mm2]

LOL. Well, at least if I am in a fog I won't remember I was gone

Of course it was to reduce the pain of sex. Because you couldn't say no.
And it was because she LOVED him so she probably would have done anything.....

 

[usnuzuloose]

Did she not say on the phone how fantastic this stuff was?

 

[crz4mm2]

I'm doing jigzone puzzles.

Every man out there watching this wishes they could be as persuasive as Travis Alexander apparently was.

Yep.
He must have been all time all persuasive.

 

[Beulah]

So, is this a positive endorsement for the KY Company?

 

[BearcatsFan]

Did she not say on the phone how fantastic this stuff was?

And that it was "good for you".

 

[BearcatsFan]

So, is this a positive endorsement for the KY Company?

Hey, any publicity is good publicity, no?

 

[kellyg403]

Anddd now we're back to talking about sex again.

And you doubted it?

I mean Nurmi is just 'Wait a minute, lets take it back'....we are all time travelers at this point.

Kelly

 

[reelmom]

She didn't want to say no because she was in love and she would have had sex anytime he wanted to. Therefore people, it isn't abuse. Plain and simple.

I 100% agree but they are trying to prove she is an abused woman that will do anything to keep him from getting angry whether she likes it or not. Nurmi and the DT are scum. They are liars just like their client but they do get paid to behave that way.

 

[usnuzuloose]

And that it was "good for you".

Lets replay that tape now...

 

[crz4mm2]

Good thing her atty is not YELLING at her, cause it looks like she is getting a headache.....

 

[Pinnie]

Mr. Nurmi's voice is such a monotone. Every time he talks I think "Bueller? Beuller?"

I have no idea how those jurors can sit there day after day and listen to them go on and on about the same thing>

 

[MaryAnnDVC]

Per Vinnie Politan...a POSSIBLE SCHEDULE OF WHAT'S TO COME (NOT WRITTEN IN STONE...IT DEPENDS ON HOW THINGS PLAY OUT)

Thursday, March 7...jury questions (thoroughly vetted by each side, and the judge will read those questions)

Starting Monday, March 12...defense experts

In about two weeks (March 18ish)...Juan Martinez' rebuttal case

March 25ish...closing arguments start

Then at some point, the jury gets the case.