I'm not sure I understand what you're asking. However, I'll take a stab in the dark and relay a bit of my experience.
In the late 1990s, I lost about 75 pounds and kept it off for almost three years. Then I gained it all back plus 10. However, back at the low point, at 174 pounds, I had a 38 waist, and was a size 40 (maybe 42) chest.
In 2001-2, I lost about 100 pounds. At the point I hit 174 again, I had a 36 waist, and was a size 44 chest. Same weight -- completely different shape. How can that be?
Well it is actually quite simple. In the late 1990s, I lost weight relying primarily on calorie restriction and aerobic exercise. In 2001-2, I lost weight relying primarily again on calorie restriction, but my exercise regimen was varied, with a substantial amount of strength training to preserve muscle mass. Hence, I ended up with more muscle (reflected in broader chest, shoulders and arms, where men often carry muscle), and less fat (reflected in a narrower waist, where men often carry excess fat). (I don't have any way to compare, really, but I believe my legs are just about the same, and that also makes sense given that men typically carry both excess fat and muscle in their legs.)