Why?Yes they can but they should not
To clarify, Frogmore Cottage was a wedding gift from his Grandmother and they will be (or maybe already have) repaying the cost of the renovation.I don’t think they should be forced to be in the royal family as senior royals if they don’t want to.
But I don’t like the way they’ve handled this from the beginning. Their first statement came out without the knowledge of the palace. To me, that showed a lack of respect for his grandmother. So then there were the discussions after that, where Harry & Megan decided that they didn’t really want to be royal but, oh yeah, “we want to use the moniker “Sussex royal” for their charitable foundation and we want access to Frogmore cottage when we decide to grace you with our presence in the UK and oh we expect that Prince Charles will still give us money for security and we expect that Canada will also provide security and oh the Canadian people can pay for that because isn’t Canada fortunate that we’re living here? Oh and we’re going to TALK about protecting the environment but we’re going traipse all over the world on private jets because after all, WE WANT PRIVACY. Except for when WE want publicity to earn money then we have no problem going to public events and being photographed. And oh, in amongst all this were going to keep putting out petulant statements about the situation which make us sound like we feel like we’re being disrespected.”
Harry is no longer the 12 year old walking behind his mothers casket. He’s a grown man. The PTSD he gets from flashbulbs doesn’t seem to bother him when it’s going to benefit him or his wife. His being recorded talking to Bob Iger attempting to get his wife voiceover work...well does he not realize if there’s a premier for a movie she worked on doing voiceovers that there would be photographers there?
You can’t be royal when it suits you. You can’t expect the benefits of the royal family without shouldering the responsibilities of it.
Just read a report that Meghan was touting for a role in a superhero movie but disney has rebuffed her. Her acting cv is not enough to get a big movie role and getting big acting roles at her age isnt going to be easy. As unfair as that is it’s the truth with Hollywood
https://**************.net/2020/03/disney-meghan-markle-update-tm1/
they have not had their hrh taken from them though they can’t use them, they have a one year review I think that is the royal family offering them a way back in if they don’t succeed outside.
This is a problem of the Royal Family’s own making, though. The reason he needs security is because he was born into royalty, which is not a matter in which he was given any choice or input. Maybe the Royal Family/UK should stop foisting global fame onto people from the moment of their birth if they don’t want to then do what’s necessary to keep them safe.When the person is saying they want financial independence and a non royal life but expect the uk to pay £20 million a year for their security how is that indepdenence
If the UK is happy to pay I don't see a problem. It's not particularly impressive for M&H to be on the dole from Canada's budget. But, the Canadian issue will be resolved April 1st.This is a problem of the Royal Family’s own making, though. The reason he needs security is because he was born into royalty, which is not a matter in which he was given any choice or input. Maybe the Royal Family/UK should stop foisting global fame onto people from the moment of their birth if they don’t want to then do what’s necessary to keep them safe.
Agreed. The financial responsibility should ultimately fall on whomever it is that wants to perpetuate and/or benefits from keeping a royal family in the first place, whether that’s the UK or the royal family themselves.If the UK is happy to pay I don't see a problem. It's not particularly impressive for M&H to be on the dole from Canada's budget. But, the Canadian issue will be resolved April 1st.
The concern is that they intend to profit from their titles overseas, which many people here highly object to. They allegedly were just paid up to $1,000,000 to appear at an event in Miami, so the concern is that they will continue to earn money based on their titles and position in the royal family. It’s really tricky situation, but I think entirely fair that they are not allowed to use their titles for monetary gain.Why?I don't entirely understand the system but that's a peerage connected to land isn't it? Does he not hold the Duchy of Sussex? Can he not be a Duke without being a Royal Duke? Just trying to learn...
I'd imagine that title-or-no-title, anyone who'd be willing to pay to see them, still will. And as far as Royal titles go, is he still allowed to identify as Prince Harry (without the HRH)? I doubt anybody world-wide wouldn't know who was being referred to if the event billing was "Prince Harry & Meghan".The concern is that they intend to profit from their titles overseas, which many people here highly object to. They allegedly were just paid up to $1,000,000 to appear at an event in Miami, so the concern is that they will continue to earn money based on their titles and position in the royal family. It’s really tricky situation, but I think entirely fair that they are not allowed to use their titles for monetary gain.