terdferguson
Earning My Ears
- Joined
- Jul 3, 2017
- Messages
- 5
DVC makes sense only if you'd pay to stay on property for the points you own, can plan at least 7 months out, can afford it (pay cash) and are OK with the compromises of a timeshare. Usually I'd also add buying resale plus a 25 points add on for essentially all new buyers and most in general.Ok just got back from a 10 day Disney marathon and I finally got the DVC information. I want to hear from you guys about what you like and don't like. . . . discuss
DVC makes sense only if you'd pay to stay on property for the points you own, can plan at least 7 months out, can afford it (pay cash) and are OK with the compromises of a timeshare. Usually I'd also add buying resale plus a 25 points add on for essentially all new buyers and most in general.
We prefer having a full kitchen, in-room laundry and "condo" layout (separated bedroom / living room spaces). DVC units answer that need and allow me to "survive" WDW visits. ;-)Ok just got back from a 10 day Disney marathon and I finally got the DVC information. I want to hear from you guys about what you like and don't like. . . . discuss
Heh, heh. Yep. But I think this idea is used as a selling point -- not a discouragement.... but you will probably end up taking more vacations
Heh, heh. Yep. But I think this idea is used as a selling point -- not a discouragement.
I'm on a timeshare vacation right now ... and loving every minute.![]()
I wouldn't agree with this for most situations. A DVC studio isn't enough savings over moderate to quibble about at current prices. If one values on site enough to pay the increased prices, they should likely be willing to go with a moderate on cash. Plus one needs sufficient knowledge and experience to know this is a good choice rather than just thinking they'd prefer to be on property. Comparative, an off site timeshare can be (roughly) a savings of 50% or more long term depending on the specific one/system. The niche for one who has the knowledge and experience to decide DVC is good value for the $$$ but a moderate isn't is dramatically small bordering on non existent.I agree, but I would add that DVC works also if you see the value of staying on property but you wouldn't pay Disney (even discounted) prices. With what I pay in MF every year I could easily book offsite a decent hotel. DVC for me it's not for saving money but to get higher value while spending what I'm still confortable with. I love staying in Disney Deluxes, but I would never book them through CRO.
We went to Disneyland in California in the fall of 2015, and after spending too much money on a two-bedroom suite at the Grand Californian, I said to my husband, "There's got to be a better (read cheaper) way."
It is a timeshare. Do not put all sorts of pixie dust on "membership."
DVC makes sense only if you'd pay to stay on property for the points you own, can plan at least 7 months out, can afford it (pay cash) and are OK with the compromises of a timeshare
All DVC is, is an alternate way of paying for your lodging. Depending on how you vacation, it can be more cost-effective
I look at it through a slightly different lens. I would not pay cash for the rooms that we stay in. Wayyy too practical for that
DVC has allowed us to vacation in a way that we simply would not have. We vacation more and stay in nicer rooms.
at Disneyland we almost always stay offsite because I dislike the Grand and won't spend the money on dlh or pph anymore