It's much closer, much easier to navigate (we fly often and deal with large airports all the time, but it is much more convenient to not have to) and if ur needing transportation; we find getting/finding it at SNA is much easier than LAX....and again without traffic it's tskes about 1/2 time to get to Disney.. with traffic it can save even more time.Getting ready to book airfare and SNA is more but not that much more. What if anything makes it a better option than LAX? We fly out of O'Hare so big airports don't really bother us. Is there something else?
If you can find a somewhat direct flight from Chicago to sna go SNA.
I can never find anything that doesn't add at least two hours to the flight so I always go to LAX.
United has nonstop flights between SNA and Chicago.
I fly out of midway. If ohare was closer though I would definitely take united non stop
Ah, okay. My best friend lives in Chicago but she is equal distance from both and flies out of O'hare when she comes here.
Is it really that much of a difference, distance wise? I guess the question would be, would you rather deal with Chicago area traffic or LA traffic? Might consider which experience is more of a hassle.
Ohare is an hour and a half with good traffic from my house.
Since I'm not driving once I get to L.A I'm not really phased by the traffic lol. But if I was renting a car then without a doubt I'm flying into sna