First Hot Cheese - Now Hot Chocolate - 5/26/11 Update - Settled

I can see it now... you'll have to provide a driver's license in order to order a warm/hot beverage and if there are any children in your party you'll have to get the warm/hot beverage in an insulated bottle that resembles a baby bottle.
 

Ridiculous!!!!!!!!! If you are going to order a HOT beverage for your child perhaps you might want to take a sip first to make sure it's not too HOT!:scared1:
 
As a parent I always feel bad of course when I child gets hurt but a a parent it's your job to make rue it's not too hot. What will the next law suit be:sad2:
 
$75,000??? Seriously? :sad2:

Sayhello

The lawsuit didn't say the actual amount they sought. It simply alleged damages in excess of $75k so it could be brought in federal court.
 
Seriously ???? It's the parents responsibility to ensure the "child" does not get into hot food...I always check item to make sure......

Remember when the person sued McDonald's for getting burned on HOT coffee...now there's warnings on the cups about the product being hot.....
 
McD's got sued because their coffee was too hot. McD's kept the coffee near boiling even though they had numerous complaints about the coffee being too hot and causing burns. They ignored the complaints even though they knew people were getting hurt.

WHY did McD's keep the coffee at near boiling?

Because they allowed free refills on coffee. To save money, by minimizing refills, they kept the coffee as hot as possible.

The person who sued had THIRD degree burns that required skin grafts.

Ironically about the time this lady was burned I was in McD's getting coffee just before going to WDW. I sipped the coffee which burned my lip and tongue. :mad: I waited for the coffee to cool down and ended up getting a cup of ice to make it cool enough to drink. But by that time I was done eating.

There are plenty of articles on the web regarding what McD's fault in the matter.

At the time there were two other lawsuits I heard about, both with psychics that were indeed frivolous. One of the psychics got an MRI or CAT scan which removed her psychic ability so she sued the Doc/hospital. The other psychic lost his/her powers when on the ski slope. She/he had an accident with another skier which removed the psychic abilities from the psychic. :confused3

You would have thought the psychics would have seen this coming....

Later,
Dan
 
McD's got sued because their coffee was too hot. McD's kept the coffee near boiling even though they had numerous complaints about the coffee being too hot and causing burns. They ignored the complaints even though they knew people were getting hurt.

WHY did McD's keep the coffee at near boiling?

Because they allowed free refills on coffee. To save money, by minimizing refills, they kept the coffee as hot as possible.

The person who sued had THIRD degree burns that required skin grafts.

Ironically about the time this lady was burned I was in McD's getting coffee just before going to WDW. I sipped the coffee which burned my lip and tongue. :mad: I waited for the coffee to cool down and ended up getting a cup of ice to make it cool enough to drink. But by that time I was done eating.

There are plenty of articles on the web regarding what McD's fault in the matter.

At the time there were two other lawsuits I heard about, both with psychics that were indeed frivolous. One of the psychics got an MRI or CAT scan which removed her psychic ability so she sued the Doc/hospital. The other psychic lost his/her powers when on the ski slope. She/he had an accident with another skier which removed the psychic abilities from the psychic. :confused3

You would have thought the psychics would have seen this coming....

Later,
Dan

Dan, there is an assumption behind your post and the McDonald's coffee lawsuit that is bothersome. Whatever the motive behind serving hot coffee (and I heard a different reason), the real issue is whether hot coffee is dangerous. A good cup of coffee, vital to a civilized society, has to be brewed at a sufficient temperature to make it satisfactory (from the standpoint of taste and smell). Before Mr. Coffee, coffee was made in a percolator, which had to boil the water in order for it to "perk" up the tube and be splashed across the grounds. Water boils at 212F degrees (at sea level). I am told the ANSI temperature for coffee is 180F degrees. Does this mean that all coffee served before Mr. Coffee knocked percolators into obscurity was unreasonably dangerous? It is uncivilized (at least in my house) to brew tea without the water boiling.

Injuries of any kind are regrettable. But the civil legal system (as far as torts is concerned) is about working toward what is reasonable. So far as I can tell (I was not involved), the McDonald's coffee lawsuit seemed to assume that serving coffee at a particular temperature was itself unreasonably dangerous.
 
Injuries of any kind are regrettable. But the civil legal system (as far as torts is concerned) is about working toward what is reasonable. So far as I can tell (I was not involved), the McDonald's coffee lawsuit seemed to assume that serving coffee at a particular temperature was itself unreasonably dangerous.

I believe that although the woman did win the original jury lawsuit but the ruling was eventually overturned in the appeal.

Hot Coffee, Hot Chocolate, Hot Tea, and Hot Nachos are all self explanatory. If parents do not properly supervise, what happens to their children unfortunately can be tragic. Not everything bad that happens makes a valid lawsuit.
 
I believe that although the woman did win the original jury lawsuit but the ruling was eventually overturned in the appeal.

Hot Coffee, Hot Chocolate, Hot Tea, and Hot Nachos are all self explanatory. If parents do not properly supervise, what happens to their children unfortunately can be tragic. Not everything bad that happens makes a valid lawsuit.

I agree with you, but I also think after seeing the pictures of the boy that got burned with the nacho cheese that it's ridiculous to serve something so hot that it causes 3rd degree burns. The parents in that case didn't hand him the cheese without checking, it spilled on him by accident and caused severe burns. It spilled, yes, accidents happen, not the parents fault, not Disney's fault, but still, bearing in that in my mind, maybe the cheese shouldn't be served scalding hot?
 
At the time there were two other lawsuits I heard about, both with psychics that were indeed frivolous. One of the psychics got an MRI or CAT scan which removed her psychic ability so she sued the Doc/hospital. The other psychic lost his/her powers when on the ski slope. She/he had an accident with another skier which removed the psychic abilities from the psychic. :confused3

You would have thought the psychics would have seen this coming....

Later,
Dan

:rotfl2:
 
A court filing this morning indicates the hot chocolate lawsuit against Disney Cruise Lines has been dismissed because it settled. The papers do not specify the settlement amount.
 
I almost wish Disney would go to court rather than settle these cases. Seriously, doesn't anyone take responsibility for their own actions anymore?
I hate to see any child injured. I dont' know the whole story and I don't know the age of the child...but where are the parents in these cases?
 
I work in a store like 7-11. When ever a child is given hot chocolate, I always tell the parents, to add some ice to it, so the child does not get burned. We have a lot of repeat customers, so most know to do this with coffee or hot choc. I agree that the parents should take some responsibility for their child.
 












Receive up to $1,000 in Onboard Credit and a Gift Basket!
That’s right — when you book your Disney Cruise with Dreams Unlimited Travel, you’ll receive incredible shipboard credits to spend during your vacation!
CLICK HERE






DIS Facebook DIS youtube DIS Instagram DIS Pinterest DIS Tiktok DIS Twitter DIS Bluesky

Back
Top Bottom