The terms of DVC ownership prohibit this. Disney does keep track of how often you do that and you can be held liable for violating the contract of ownership if you do it too often.
Really? But they do allow renting points occasionally officially? Or do they just "turn a blind eye" to it (apologies if that phrase doesn't translate from UK to US)
You wouldn't make much and there are some risks.
Your rental point - if you rent the easy way though David's - would get you $11 - you could probably get $12 or $13 if you rent yourself (a lot more bother). David charges $14, so at that point you are competing with brokers who can offer services like escrow and owner aggregation. So - to be conservative, lets say $11.
Let's say you own SSR (sort of best case in terms of purchase price and dues, although the riskiest since not many people go looking for SSR points at eleven months - you end up with potential availability issues at seven. My BWV points are easy to rent at eleven months during Food and Wine - SSR doesn't have that sort of primary demand period). Let's say you are getting it for $75 a point purchase price - and to keep the math easy - 100 points (you can put a multiplier in there for whatever you want).
So you spend $7500 on the points. This year dues at SSR are $4.91 - lets round to $5. They'll be that or higher next year. And lets use an interest rate of 5% (the dividend rate for AT&T stock or close to the dividend rate of BP - in other words, conservative interest assumptions).
So in year one, each point has cost you $75 - or lets say $2 per year, plus $3.75 in TVM, plus $5 in dues, you rent for $11. you rent for $11. You have about $10.75 in costs, and make $.25 in profit. But wait, you aren't done, you have to pay taxes on the profit, but being a timeshare, your profit is rental amount - dues - so $11 - $5, or you pay taxes on $6 in profit. (At least in the U.S.). So you are looking at - say a 25% tax rate, paying $1.50 in taxes. So at this point, its cost you about $1.25 to own for the purpose of renting points.
Financial math simplified and I haven't had my coffee yet.
Renting is expressly permitted. However, the documents you sign at purchase include a clause that prohibits commercial use. Commercial use is not defined in the documents.
Based on the reports of others, making 20 or more reservations per year for someone other than yourself will trigger an "audit". You will be asked to show that you are not renting "commercially".
Before you proceed with this plan, be sure you understand all the risks and the time you may have to invest to be successful. You will experience competition for customers and DVC will hold you responsible for any damage or bills that your customers may leave behind.
Others will probably chime in with specific info on the financials. FWIW, any potential profit isn't enough for me to invest the capital, let alone compensate for my time. YMMV.
Thanks - great quick calculations! So, basically, the rental market is priced to allow people to just about breakeven on their points in periods where (for whatever reason) they can't use them themselves. Makes sense I guess, given the prohibition on commercial use.![]()
Depending on your buy in price and assuming you only rented (didn't use) and picked higher demand times to offer, you'd make a profit but generally in the 6-8% range before taxes (usually less) is about the best I've seen on previous calculations. That assumes resale, good price, high demand reservations and the like. When you consider it's a drepeciating asset, ultimately it'd be difficult to make much at all and consider ROP as well. Given it'd be a high risk investment, it's not worth doing it as an investment alone UNLESS one can get in for much less in some way. Given Disney's ROFR, this is unlikely.Just wondering if anyone has done the calculations on this? If you bought a DVC contract and just rented out all the points every year to expiry, would you actually make any money? If so, what is the % yield each year?
I doubt they constructed this rule related to finances per se but rather so they truly retained control. It's a common rule with points type timeshare systems, the outlying portion is the fact they they expressly allow renting.Under nearly all conceivable conditions Disney would have constructed this (DVC) so only they make money ...or they make all the money to the maximum degree possible.
The fact that they have a rule prohibiting commercial renting implies they believe you do (or might) have a shot at making a worthwhile return.
Irritates me when DVC is looked at as an investment in any other that vacation time.
You wouldn't make much and there are some risks. Your rental point - if you rent the easy way though David's - would get you $11 - you could probably get $12 or $13 if you rent yourself (a lot more bother). David charges $14, so at that point you are competing with brokers who can offer services like escrow and owner aggregation. So - to be conservative, lets say $11. Let's say you own SSR (sort of best case in terms of purchase price and dues, although the riskiest since not many people go looking for SSR points at eleven months - you end up with potential availability issues at seven. My BWV points are easy to rent at eleven months during Food and Wine - SSR doesn't have that sort of primary demand period). Let's say you are getting it for $75 a point purchase price - and to keep the math easy - 100 points (you can put a multiplier in there for whatever you want). So you spend $7500 on the points. This year dues at SSR are $4.91 - lets round to $5. They'll be that or higher next year. And lets use an interest rate of 5% (the dividend rate for AT&T stock or close to the dividend rate of BP - in other words, conservative interest assumptions). So in year one, each point has cost you $75 - or lets say $2 per year, plus $3.75 in TVM, plus $5 in dues, you rent for $11. you rent for $11. You have about $10.75 in costs, and make $.25 in profit. But wait, you aren't done, you have to pay taxes on the profit, but being a timeshare, your profit is rental amount - dues - so $11 - $5, or you pay taxes on $6 in profit. (At least in the U.S.). So you are looking at - say a 25% tax rate, paying $1.50 in taxes. So at this point, its cost you about $1.25 to own for the purpose of renting points. Financial math simplified and I haven't had my coffee yet.
It depends on your assumptions re: opportunity cost of the purchase price. Under most realistic scenarios, there is a small positive return, but probably not enough vs. other investment opportunities, and it is hard to quantify the long-term risk.If so, what is the % yield each year?
I doubt they constructed this rule related to finances per se but rather so they truly retained control. It's a common rule with points type timeshare systems, the outlying portion is the fact they they expressly allow renting.
Likely not but from a DVC standpoint it really wouldn't matter, DVC is a separate entity. To me, any member renting their points is the same as them using their points.Taking it to the extreme if all of us became mini commercial DVC renters we would become a significant unwanted economic force in direct competition with both DVC sales and cash bookings.
Usually when this idea is posted it's basically the idea that someone can tell others how to use the membership. The "it's OK to use it but not to rent it out" idea. Whether that's what was meant here, I don't know. A related idea that some try to use to hide their true feelings is something like "it's OK to rent but not to make a profit" which is code for it's not really OK to rent but they're not going to post their true feelings.Why?