FlightlessDuck
Y kant Donald fly?
- Joined
- Jun 20, 2006
- Messages
- 21,804
I believe the question is now moot. No matter if you want or need to, you can't and won't.
I disagree. If the US does not release the photos, they will get leaked anyway.
I believe the question is now moot. No matter if you want or need to, you can't and won't.
Shouldn't we start calling them "deathers" now?
I believe the question is now moot. No matter if you want or need to, you can't and won't.
I disagree. If the US does not release the photos, they will get leaked anyway.
I believe the photo will be released at some point.
*double snork*My mad photoshop skillz!
![]()
Well, a body for one. Like I said earlier-it's just too convenient that he was "buried at sea". They could ALWAYS have done that later. Yes, they say they have DNA-and when you throw out those letters, people assume that can't be wrong-but like I said, where did they get the previous samples to compare this one to?? How about some information about that? Yes, photos can be faked and just releasing a photo would still not convince me he is actually dead for that reason. I see no reason that they could not have brought his body somewhere, gotten outside confirmation from several different countries and released the DNA information as proof they have actually killed him--THEN dump his body at sea.
They got the DNA sample from his dead body. Don't you think that if the US said he was dead and he wasn't, he would be putting out another video with dated proof that he was still alive. He id dead.
Right---but you need something to compare that DNA TO to show that is OBL's. You can just map out DNA and figure out who the person is from that mapping. Yes, I do believe that if we CAPTURED him, we would say we killed him so we didn't have to comply with the Genevra Convention for treatment of prisoners of war.
And even if it is, no one will believe it. They will claim it's photoshopped. If they personally saw the body, they would say it's a body double. If they see DNA evidence, they will claim it's faked. It's great to have a healthy amount of skepticism. But skepticism based on party lines -- not so healthy.
Right---but you need something to compare that DNA TO to show that is OBL's. You can just map out DNA and figure out who the person is from that mapping. Yes, I do believe that if we CAPTURED him, we would say we killed him so we didn't have to comply with the Genevra Convention for treatment of prisoners of war.
And even if it is, no one will believe it. They will claim it's photoshopped. If they personally saw the body, they would say it's a body double. If they see DNA evidence, they will claim it's faked. It's great to have a healthy amount of skepticism. But skepticism based on party lines -- not so healthy.
And even if it is, no one will believe it. They will claim it's photoshopped. If they personally saw the body, they would say it's a body double. If they see DNA evidence, they will claim it's faked. It's great to have a healthy amount of skepticism. But skepticism based on party lines -- not so healthy.
They will compare it to DNA of his family members. Anything else?
And even if it is, no one will believe it. They will claim it's photoshopped. If they personally saw the body, they would say it's a body double. If they see DNA evidence, they will claim it's faked. It's great to have a healthy amount of skepticism. But skepticism based on party lines -- not so healthy.
Nope. I figure if the President was confident enough to announce it to the world on tv that Bin Laden was dead, I'll take his word for it.
I don't think it always has to do with part lines, there are those who distrust the Gov't in general, no matter what side is sitting in The White House.