"anybody but Bush"
Works for me.....
"anybody but Bush"
Originally posted by peachgirl
Works for me.....
Originally posted by wvrevy
Cool, so in that case:
Bush dodged the draft.
Bush did cocaine for years.
Bush planned on invading Iraq from 9/12/01.
Bush knew there were no WMD's.
Bush knew he was lying in the state of the union about the Niger story.
Hey...I like this game![]()
Coming from you, this is hilarious on so many levels. I have to retreat for a while now because I amOriginally posted by ThreeCircles
Your definition of "fact" and "opinion" kind of draws into question your credibility on any number of topics.
Originally posted by gometros
Personally, I'm glad they allowed the DB to reside here on the CB. Had they not, I would have never discovered how much fun it is.
Well, if you'd bothered to take the thing in context, you might have realized that I was posting those "facts" in an effort to show that they were just as much "truth" as the crap you and others keep posting about Clinton (talk about being uninformed of the current talking points...the guy's been out of office for nearly 4 years now, you'd think the Repuglicans would find something else to whine about...lol)Originally posted by dmadman43
Dude, you best find out why you've been dropped from the Democratic Talking Points mailing list. You spewing the old talking points. Those weren't sticking. Even McAwful recognized that.. But, let's take them one at time, since I'm bored..
Bush dodged the draft
Well the members of the NG will be happy to hear that. Let's hope you don't their assistance any time soon. But, assuming this is a "fact", Clinton dodged the draft, too. So......what's your point?
[b} Bush did cocaine for years
The evidence for this wouldn't even be accepted in kangaroo court
Bush planned invading Iraq from 9/12/01
You say that as if it were a bad thing.
There were no WMD's
Wait a minute! I thought I read somewhere on this board that we sold them WMD's in the 80's. How could there be no WMD's, yet at the same time, the US sold Iraq WMD's?![]()
Bush knew he was lying in the state of the union about the]Niger story
This was admitted.....when? [/B]
Originally posted by wvrevy
As to the drivel you posted in "refuting" my "facts"...Whatever helps you sleep at night I guess...I'm not sure when Clinton admitted to those supposed "facts" about himself, but then I guess that standard only applies to him, rather than the current president...![]()
The only reason that matters regarding while former President Clinton should not speak at Mr. Reagan's funeral today is that he was not invited to speak. Mr. & Mrs. Reagan planned this funeral together; it's their choice of who speaks. All the whiners should be thankful they were invited to attend at all.Originally posted by DawnCt1
The fact that matters is that Clinton is an impeached president. That is one very good reason why he shouldn't have been invited to speak at President Reagan's funeral.
Originally posted by Eeyore1954
The only reason that matters regarding while former President Clinton should not speak at Mr. Reagan's funeral today is that he was not invited to speak. Mr. & Mrs. Reagan planned this funeral together; it's their choice of who speaks. All the whiners should be thankful they were invited to attend at all.
Originally posted by wvrevy
Well, if you'd bothered to take the thing in context, you might have realized that I was posting those "facts" in an effort to show that they were just as much "truth" as the crap you and others keep posting about Clinton (talk about being uninformed of the current talking points...the guy's been out of office for nearly 4 years now, you'd think the Repuglicans would find something else to whine about...lol)
Try to keep up, will you ?![]()
As to the drivel you posted in "refuting" my "facts"...Whatever helps you sleep at night I guess...I'm not sure when Clinton admitted to those supposed "facts" about himself, but then I guess that standard only applies to him, rather than the current president...![]()
BTW, the 2000 election has been over for 4 years, too. You'd think the Dems would find something else to whine about
Originally posted by peachgirl
You'd think the Republicans would do the same regarding President Clinton, yet they never seem to tire of re-hashing the same old garbage.
Republicans would do well to remember their candidate is running against Kerry, not President Clinton.
Yes, because as we have all been told numerous times by Shrub supporters, it's impossible to respect the presidency (or the troops...or the country...or whatever) without agreeing with everything the smirking chimp spouts off as he's running from the pressOriginally posted by Patch'sD
If Clinton would respect the office that he once held and stop his critical speaches of the President, maybe some would lay-off. But since he must still seek the lime light, he then deserves the negative press.
Originally posted by Alice28
Okay, who else noticed that President Clinton looked half stoned during the service????????????? What was with THAT!?! I am sure he was not, but he sure looked goofy/asleep/ just plain odd! And Hillary looked like she was not too happy either; but not, "I'm mourning someone" unhappy, but like, "I just got into a big fight with someone and I'm stewing about it" unhappy.
I just thought it was very strange and I am sure I am not the only one who noticed it!!!!!!!
I really didn't take notice of President Clinton or anyone else in attendance, I was busy paying attention to the funeral itself.
ITA, peachgirl. We have no idea what former President & Mrs. Clinton were thinking or feeling during the funeral. But to assume the worst (and I am no fan of the Clintons) is simply not right or fair.Originally posted by peachgirl
That didn't take long....![]()
I really didn't take notice of President Clinton or anyone else in attendance, I was busy paying attention to the funeral itself. I think it's been a beautiful, dignified ceremony. To demean it with comments such as yours is classless to say the least.