While reading the morning paper with my morning cup of coffee, the following story gave me more of a wake-up jolt than the coffee. This story will probably give rise to a lot of comments, but I have to let all know about this story. After reading the threads on this board about refunds, discounts, cruising during hurricane season, etc., this is an eye opener. I'm surprised DCL felt the pressure of a news reporter calling on behalf of this family. My DH and I are sailing on the 9/18 Magic. Maybe I can have this columnist contact DCL on my behalf for some perks! I am unable to link you to the article itself. I will quote pertinent parts of the article:
The West family hoped to find a few thrills at Disney World last week, but sailing toward Hurricane Frances wasn't what they had in mind. There was NO WAY we were going to get on that cruise ship Mike West said.
Disney's initial posiiton was: cruise or lose.
After I (columnist) presented the family's case to Disney spokeswoman Rena Langley, the Disney folks decided to buy the Wests another cruise.
Their cruise ship, scheduled to leave Port Canaveral on Sept. 2, was bound for Nassau, which was exactly where Frances was headed. The Wests were astonished to learn that the cruise was still on. The Wests were told that the Disney Wonder would sail, with or without them. And, no, a refund was not possible. A rain check? No. Some extra day sin the parks? No.
The Wests decided to stay on land, maintaining that the expectations of the Disney folks were unreasonable, the voyage was foolhardy, and their decision to remain on land was the only prudent choice.
They figure that the cruise portion of the package was worth about $2000 - and believed they deserved some kind of compensation.
After investigating, Langley (Disney spokeswoman) said late Wednesday that Disney would send the Wests a voucher for a future cruise.
The West family hoped to find a few thrills at Disney World last week, but sailing toward Hurricane Frances wasn't what they had in mind. There was NO WAY we were going to get on that cruise ship Mike West said.
Disney's initial posiiton was: cruise or lose.
After I (columnist) presented the family's case to Disney spokeswoman Rena Langley, the Disney folks decided to buy the Wests another cruise.
Their cruise ship, scheduled to leave Port Canaveral on Sept. 2, was bound for Nassau, which was exactly where Frances was headed. The Wests were astonished to learn that the cruise was still on. The Wests were told that the Disney Wonder would sail, with or without them. And, no, a refund was not possible. A rain check? No. Some extra day sin the parks? No.
The Wests decided to stay on land, maintaining that the expectations of the Disney folks were unreasonable, the voyage was foolhardy, and their decision to remain on land was the only prudent choice.
They figure that the cruise portion of the package was worth about $2000 - and believed they deserved some kind of compensation.
After investigating, Langley (Disney spokeswoman) said late Wednesday that Disney would send the Wests a voucher for a future cruise.
Unless he and his family flew out of Florida BEFORE that cruise left port, he was endangering his family more than putting them on the ship. So much for his brilliant notion that going on a cruise was "foolhardy".
And so is the columnist for not recognising this fact.


