I'm straight and I knew that one... I think someone's membership card needs to be taken away...
Anyway, I just wanted to post my congratulations on this ruling!!! Hopefully, the voters will have enough sense to not let an amendment overturn the decision...
My fingers will continue to be crossed for ALL who want to marry!!!
I'm straight and I knew that one... I think someone's membership card needs to be taken away...
Anyway, I just wanted to post my congratulations on this ruling!!! Hopefully, the voters will have enough sense to not let an amendment overturn the decision...
My fingers will continue to be crossed for ALL who want to marry!!!
I was sooo happy to hear the CA news; my undies have been in a bunch about Amendment 2 here in FL, so I'm always glad to see that some states aren't as backward as we are. I was listening to the Neal Boortz radio show, and he was sparring with a caller who claimed to be for gay unions but who didn't want them to be called "marriage." It was hilarious...Neal kept asking him why, and he kept saying "Because marriage is between a man and a woman." Then Neal would say, "Well, why is that?" and the caller would say, "Well, just because it IS." Don't people realize that definitions are fluid and can be changed? Maybe it meant that before, but why can't we expand it now to include any loving couple wishing to make a commitment? "Because" is NOT a good enough answer. I wish people like that would see that they make themselves look like idiots using a logic that intelligent people stop using somewhere around the age of 10.
I was sooo happy to hear the CA news; my undies have been in a bunch about Amendment 2 here in FL, so I'm always glad to see that some states aren't as backward as we are. I was listening to the Neal Boortz radio show, and he was sparring with a caller who claimed to be for gay unions but who didn't want them to be called "marriage." It was hilarious...Neal kept asking him why, and he kept saying "Because marriage is between a man and a woman." Then Neal would say, "Well, why is that?" and the caller would say, "Well, just because it IS." Don't people realize that definitions are fluid and can be changed? Maybe it meant that before, but why can't we expand it now to include any loving couple wishing to make a commitment? "Because" is NOT a good enough answer. I wish people like that would see that they make themselves look like idiots using a logic that intelligent people stop using somewhere around the age of 10.
inkkognito - thanks for coming over - and for the suport
I see you all the time over at the cruise board-
Can I ask - Why does everything over there see to degenerate into an argument?
It's so funny - you'd never expect it -
but some of the most benign topics devolve
into some heated debate.
inkkognito - thanks for coming over - and for the suport
I see you all the time over at the cruise board-
Can I ask - Why does everything over there see to degenerate into an argument?
It's so funny - you'd never expect it -
but some of the most benign topics devolve
into some heated debate.
I've noticed that lately too on the cruise board. I'm not even posting there as much as usual because the most innocuous statements turn into a bloody battle. Who would have thought that a question about tossing a message in a bottle would have gotten so nasty that the thread got locked? And can you believe the "peeing off the verandah" thread is STILL going on? Oh, well, makes for good entertainment anyway.
I've noticed that lately too on the cruise board. I'm not even posting there as much as usual because the most innocuous statements turn into a bloody battle. Who would have thought that a question about tossing a message in a bottle would have gotten so nasty that the thread got locked? And can you believe the "peeing off the verandah" thread is STILL going on? Oh, well, makes for good entertainment anyway.