I hope this isn't the direction they plan on going. Universal is firing salvos across Disney's bow in Orlando with their new theme park, and Disney is asking people if they'd be interested in staying at ski resorts around the country.
I wish they'd focus on their core products in their core locations instead of dabbling into things that have mostly been failures. The off site
DVC locations haven't been great successes.
I do suppose that Aulani is a nice resort, but if I ever plan a trip to Hawaii it's going to be to see more of the islands and explore the beauty of the non-commercialized areas. Small sample size, but all of my friends who have gone to Hawaii have spent time traveling around the islands, not staying in one place for a week. If I just wanted to sit on the beach at a nice hotel, I could do that for a lot less money and time by going to Bermuda or the Caribbean.
The rub with Hawaii (or any of the other far-flung locations on the survey) - it's expensive just getting there. These aren't places that most people will travel to annually in a manner of how the typical timeshare model works. The truth is that the majority of Americans can't afford to travel like that regularly.
And I don't see how a ski resort would work within the timeshare model at all. Skiing is a seasonal attraction. What do you do to draw people there other times of the year? You'd have everyone clamoring to book rooms a few months out of the year, and a bunch of other people unable to use their points because they don't want to book in an off season.
They're going to sell these as "visit XYZ whenever you can, but when you don't want to travel there, you can always use your points at Walt Disney World!" which is going to put more strain on the WDW resorts. If any of these locations move forward, I'd like to see them excluded from booking at WDW (although I know the chance of that happening is slim to none).