HydroGuy
A Pirate's Life For Me
- Joined
- Jun 5, 2005
- Messages
- 18,415
Lots of near term and further out information in Al's article today. See www.miceage.com/allutz/al013007a.htm
Albort, from what I read, and I am serious here, you and the others CMs need to get a huge raise - at least 25% and maybe 50%. And that is just a start. You guys and gals do a great job and are underpaid and it sounds like many of you are forced to work overtime for many weeks in a row. Keep up the good work.LOL, it says a lot of CM has quit, i beg to differ! ^_^
Free PIN??? I havent gotten anything yet!
If you read some of the history, the water in the PP area is smaller than some folks wanted when DCA was being designed. With the small size, it may not be possible to do what you are suggesting.You know, if they made the proposed new lagoon show at DCA more like IllumiNations, where you could watch it from anywhere around the lagoon, it would alleviate the visual and crowd problems that Al was talking about in his article. I think they could do that with the type of show that they're planning.
Just a thought.![]()
Albort, from what I read, and I am serious here, you and the others CMs need to get a huge raise - at least 25% and maybe 50%. And that is just a start. You guys and gals do a great job and are underpaid and it sounds like many of you are forced to work overtime for many weeks in a row. Keep up the good work.
One thing I found interesting is the crowd capacity for Fantasmic. I have read elsewhere that WDW's Fantasmic can accomodate more than DLR's, but it appears that is far from the truth. Al says that DLR Fantasmic can handle 16,000. I seem to remember that at WDW MGM they can seat 5,000 in the stadium.
You know, if they made the proposed new lagoon show at DCA more like IllumiNations, where you could watch it from anywhere around the lagoon, it would alleviate the visual and crowd problems that Al was talking about in his article. I think they could do that with the type of show that they're planning.
Just a thought.![]()
But that wouldn't address the smoke issue mentioned in the article. . . its a tough one!
If you read some of the history, the water in the PP area is smaller than some folks wanted when DCA was being designed. With the small size, it may not be possible to do what you are suggesting.
I understood what you meant originally, and was just pointing out that DCA might have more flexibility to use its lagoon for shows if it was bigger. In any case, if the show is designed accordingly there is no reason it cannot be viewed from anywhere around the lagoon.Oops, it looks like maybe a few people are confused about what I was saying.
I didn't mean that the new show at DCA should be the same as IllumiNations. I was only referring to the ABILITY to be able to WATCH THE SHOW from anywhere around the water (just like you can when watching IllumiNations).
Why wouldn't you be able to watch a dancing fountains/laser projection show from anywhere around the lagoon at DCA?![]()
Al has something critical to say about most everything Disney, which some will say is only because he is trying to hold them to a high standard they have reached in times past. In any case, I did not take Al's comment about SM to mean it is not as good as DL's (it definitely isn't) but only that it is in need of a major refurb like DL's is getting right now.Thanks for sharing - love to learn about DL as much as I can. I did not like, however, all the "stale" remarks about WDW though. . . especially about SM when I hear from so many people (even here) that the one in the MK is "better".
I understood what you meant originally, and was just pointing out that DCA might have more flexibility to use its lagoon for shows if it was bigger. In any case, if the show is designed accordingly there is no reason it cannot be viewed from anywhere around the lagoon.