I have no way of knowing whether the figures posted for AL Gore were correct or not as I suspect all who post here do not know either but it seems that the group who posted the figures had an agenda, is it just to point out hypocracy in all it's forms I doubt it. It would seem it is from a group with an agenda who want to discredit Al Gore and his current 'mission'.
Would it be good if he sold up and lived in a terraced house, well it would reduce his carbon useage, but he probably works at home currently as well and he is clearly rich and will inevitably produce more carbon
Is he a Hypocrite possibly but if he is acting to reduce his usage from a higher level then no. If he reduced his usage by 25% and we all did the same there would be great benefit but clearly some will always consume more goods and therefore will produce more carbon than others.
Why not the same critisism of Bono for his advocacy of the poor in Africa, urging debt relief and the giving of aid without giving up all his wealth other than that of the average person?