NotUrsula
DIS Veteran
- Joined
- Apr 19, 2002
Some frequent flyers assert that when some legacy airlines reconfigured their aircraft, reducing pitch by adding extra rows of seats, they didn't restrict the recline to reflect the reduced pitch.
True. A 10-in. recline is a significant intrusion when the seat pitch is only 31 inches, but not so bad when it is 35. Older seats also have thicker back cushions, which also take up more space. The larger the plane, the more generous the recline usually is, because larger planes are most commonly used for long hauls.
I find that the age of the fittings makes a big difference in this regard. My personal pet annoyance is the passenger I think of as a seat-breaker -- the one who deliberately slams his/her body weight against the seat back while holding the latch. There are a lot of these people. The mechanism is only a ratchet; hit it hard enough and it will slip past the last notch. After years of this treatment, the seat won't stay fully upright at all, and it will recline much further than it was meant to. There are a LOT of seats like this on aircraft that haven't been refitted in a while.
As for rearranging things in the overhead: I don't have an issue if they are just shifting it an inch or two, or turning a case wheels-in. If there is a coat there, they should ask you to take it back for a moment so that they can put the case in without crushing it. Moving someone's case to another bin entirely is rude beyond belief.
Oh, and for short women: choose the aisle seat. You can toe your shoes off for a minute and stand on the seat cushion to put your carryon in the overhead. That's how most short people manage, just like we do in the grocery store.