Does anyone have any experience with this camera? I have only had P&S but am wanting a DSLR for two reasons. 1 is I want to be able to take multiple pictures per second (to capture lightning quick children!) and still have them come out as good quality pictures and 2 just because I want nice quality pictures. I am not even sure if these are solid reasons for wanting such an upgrade (so would appreciate info on that, too, if I'm mistaken... would just a P&S work for that? if so, which one?). I am open to other cameras if anyone has any suggestions. I don't really want to spend a ton of time learning how to use it (simply because I don't think I would be good at it and I just want to take quick pictures not spend time getting it on the right setting). Honestly, I would probably just use the auto setting and rarely, if ever change lenses. I do know how to use graphics programs and probably would do some editing (I do now even on my canon P&S). I am not sure I want to carry around a big camera all the time (I might), but I want the DSLR speed/quality, so that is why I was considering the GF2 since it is small but has OK ratings and seems to work pretty OK for a beginner DSLR. My husband just wants me to go ahead and get the real deal, expensive, well rated Canon or Nikon with the lenses and the works. I'm afraid I may have buyer's remorse about spending so much money on one and not getting the full return out of it since I won't know how to use it. I basically want it for "soccer mom use" if that makes any sense. Or vacations, sometimes food, and some macro uses, that's it. So, is the GF2 a good pick for the price or should I go with a full size model in another brand, or just stick with a P&S? I don't really have a price range, but I just want good value for my money whether it be $200 or $1200 I am spending. I'm sorry if this is confusing. I am confused myself! Thank you so much to anyone that can help!