anyone take western civ yet?

Discussion in 'The College Board' started by Blueeyes101817, Feb 28, 2005.

  1. Blueeyes101817

    Blueeyes101817 <font color=blue>Diehard <b>Cowboys</b> fan!<br><f

    Joined:
    Jan 31, 2004
    Messages:
    24,382
    im figuring out what classes i am going to take this summer and my history choices are western civ to 1648, or western civ since 1648..
    which one should i go for?
     
  2. Avatar

    Google AdSense Guest Advertisement


    to hide this advert.
  3. Stitch_lover_Sith

    Stitch_lover_Sith <font color=royalblue>So I want to weigh in on thi

    Joined:
    Feb 20, 2005
    Messages:
    352
    I have taken both. I would say if you love the Greeks and Romans take till 1648 but if you love the midddle age and everything past that like world war one and two then take the ohter. Really just think about witch period of history you love more. I am somewhat of a classical studies major so I of course loved western civ one. :teacher:
     
  4. supercarrie

    supercarrie DIS Veteran

    Joined:
    Aug 13, 2001
    Messages:
    4,190
    Personally, I would take Western Civ since 1648. At the end of this term, I will have completed the UCLA western civ series through 1715 (taking 1715 to present next term) and although I enjoyed learned about the Egyptians/Greeks/Romans/Middle Ages/Renaissance, I enjoy more modern history. I think ultimately you should pick based on what areas you are most interested in.
     
  5. DisTeach

    DisTeach Mouseketeer

    Joined:
    Jan 5, 2005
    Messages:
    216
    I also prefer Modern Civ II!! The issues surrounding ancient Greeks and Romans don't completely fascinate me since war was so prevalent! (although Mesopatamia is cool in I).
     
  6. Blueeyes101817

    Blueeyes101817 <font color=blue>Diehard <b>Cowboys</b> fan!<br><f

    Joined:
    Jan 31, 2004
    Messages:
    24,382
    thanks..im not a big history person, thats why i asked--haha, i ended up taking since 1668
     

Share This Page