Jodi Arias Trial Part 2, starting with JM cross of JA

[usnuzuloose]

Originally Posted by Uncle Remus

I doubt those magazines even made it past the guards, they know what to look for.

You think the guards turned it over?

[Uncle Remus]

Originally Posted by usnuzuloose

You think the guards turned it over?

Of course.

ETA: Too bad the camera wasn't on Campbell when Martinez first said you tried to give these magazines to Ann Campbell, she's been in the court room, but I didn't notice her today.

[usnuzuloose]

I didn't know she was in the court room. I never even knew they had a hearing. I am glad it was still turned over.

[usnuzuloose]

Originally Posted by Uncle Remus

Of course.

ETA: Too bad the camera wasn't on Campbell when Martinez first said you tried to give these magazines to Ann Campbell, she's been in the court room, but I didn't notice her today.

Maybe he gave her a heads up.

[msjprincess]

I don't understand why so many people are making a big deal about her taking her glasses off to read. I've been wearing glasses for 20 years. I can't watch tv or walk down the block without my glasses on. But I'm nearsighted, so I take them off when I read. If I try to read with my glasses on it's just a blurry mess.

The prosecutor is driving me crazy with all of the jumping around. The last thing he needs to do is confuse the jury.

[msjprincess]

Originally Posted by TiggerTails57

Makes me wonder if they are fake

But if they were fake why would she need to take them off? She would be able to see through them fine.

[MaryAnnDVC]

Originally Posted by Uncle Remus

I doubt those magazines even made it past the guards, they know what to look for.

That's what I was thinking.

Originally Posted by Uncle Remus

Of course.

ETA: Too bad the camera wasn't on Campbell when Martinez first said you tried to give these magazines to Ann Campbell, she's been in the court room, but I didn't notice her today.

Geez, you're good. Did they mention this on InSession or how did you know? I'm missing a lot of this trial! Or maybe I did hear she was there in the last TWO MONTHS and it didn't register or I forgot. This trial is like The Song That Never Ends.

[momrek06]

So everyone, I watched right up until the late afternoon break and then I had several important calls I had to take.

Got back to the trial when they were discussing JA chasing after some dude that she was dating back in 2000-2001. Actually JA was chasing after the new gf her ex was dating.

So what did I miss after they returned from the late afternoon break? Any recap I would LOVE because I am confused about the "magazine" discussion on here. And who is Ann Campbell?

TY TY TY TY TY

[momrek06]

Originally Posted by MaryAnnDVC

This trial is like The Song That Never Ends.

LOL, Mar …

[momrek06]

Yes, it does seem like JM is jumping around.

First of all I never thought the FINGER would be first out of the box and leading up to the POP ROCKS/TOOTSIE POPS with a mention of the LOVE SACK.

I am glad JM has the next few days to go over all this.

STAY FOCUSED, JM. STAY FOCUSED. YOU ARE DOING GREAT.

[Uncle Remus]

Originally Posted by usnuzuloose

I didn't know she was in the court room. I never even knew they had a hearing. I am glad it was still turned over.

Definitely shows Jodi was attempting to tamper with potential witnesses.

Originally Posted by msjprincess

I don't understand why so many people are making a big deal about her taking her glasses off to read. I've been wearing glasses for 20 years. I can't watch tv or walk down the block without my glasses on. But I'm nearsighted, so I take them off when I read. If I try to read with my glasses on it's just a blurry mess.

The prosecutor is driving me crazy with all of the jumping around. The last thing he needs to do is confuse the jury.

Nobody has said a word about Nurmi dropping his glasses down to his chin to read. One of the talking heads on HLN said Arias used to wear contacts and is near sighted. She started wearing glasses on the 2nd day of court, then it was a different pair for a number of days til she settled on these.

[usnuzuloose]

Originally Posted by momrek06

So everyone, I watched right up until the late afternoon break and then I had several important calls I had to take.

Got back to the trial when they were discussing JA chasing after some dude that she was dating back in 2000-2001. Actually JA was chasing after the new gf her ex was dating.

So what did I miss after they returned from the late afternoon break? Any recap I would LOVE because I am confused about the "magazine" discussion on here. And who is Ann Campbell?

TY TY TY TY TY

There was a hearing in Aug 2011 over the child porn. She had these magazines that she wanted to give to a friend that she wrote a message in on different pages wanting her to lie for her.

[usnuzuloose]

Originally Posted by Uncle Remus

Definitely shows Jodi was attempting to tamper with potential witnesses.



Nobody has said a word about Nurmi dropping his glasses down to his chin to read. One of the talking heads on HLN said Arias used to wear contacts and is near sighted. She started wearing glasses on the 2nd day of court, then it was a different pair for a number of days til she settled on these.

From what I hear if there is a shred of evidence that the defendant has lied the jury has the right to just throw aside what ever of the testimony and find her guilty. I can't wait to get back to the issue on monday.

[Uncle Remus]

Originally Posted by MaryAnnDVC

That's what I was thinking.Geez, you're good. Did they mention this on InSession or how did you know? I'm missing a lot of this trial! Or maybe I did hear she was there in the last TWO MONTHS and it didn't register or I forgot. This trial is like The Song That Never Ends.

I'm nosey.

The internet is my friend.

[Uncle Remus]

Originally Posted by usnuzuloose

From what I hear if there is a shred of evidence that the defendant has lied the jury has the right to just throw aside what ever of the testimony and find her guilty. I can't wait to get back to the issue on monday.

The thought is if you don't believe one thing the defendant claims, you don't have to believe any of it.