12-26-2012, 08:51 PM
|
#1 |
|
Mouseketeer
Join Date: Jun 2012
Posts: 439
|
My picture...question
Okay.
i need your opinion.... this is the same picture, except one has been photo shopped - not going to mention which one. which picture looks better version a...might be original...might be photoshopped  or version b...might be original...might be photoshopped  I will let everyone know which is which after people vote in posts
__________________
|
|
|
| Sponsored Links | |
|
|
|
|
12-26-2012, 09:29 PM
|
#2 |
|
Never have fallen asleep on any attraction
Nothing wrong for dreaming for sure 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Kansas City
Posts: 7,679
|
First one is better. Better contrast and saturation but maybe a little overdone. Not sure if the photo is in focus either? Seems a little off.
__________________
"WDW Vet Who Found His New Home in Disneyland"
2013 Disneyland Christmas 2013 Plan to go in May to WDW, Universal, and SeaWorld with the kids and their High School Marching Band Event 2012 Back to Disneyland for a late June/Early July Vacation|2011- WDW Grand Floridian/Port Orleans Riverside |2010 - Disneyland/Monterey 20th Anniversary Day trip and 1st time to see Christmas at any park (BWPPI) 2010 - Disneyland (Grand Californian) |2009 - Disneyland/San Francisco/Monterey/ Yosemite National Park (Disneyland Hotel) |2008 - Disneyland/San Diego (Hotel Del Coronado & Hojo) |2007 - Disneyland (Fairfield Inn) |2006 - WDW - Port Orleans Riverside |2004 - WDW - Port Orleans Riverside |1996 - WDW - Dixie Landings |1993 - WDW - Offsite |1992 - WDW - Condo in Kissimmee |1990 - WDW - Condo in Kissimmee Gear:Canon 60d, Canon xti, and a few lenses |
|
|
|
|
12-26-2012, 10:50 PM
|
#3 |
|
Knows a little about a lot of things, a lot about nothing.
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: in the middle of Dallas/Fort Worth
Posts: 3,940
|
The first one looks better overall but to me still has some pretty big issues.
"Photoshopped" usually implies more than just basic editing/processing. IN that respect I'd say neither have really been photoshopped. But the first one has a look that suggests it may have been processed a bit much.
__________________
 DanielleI've forsaken my crop and gotten a 6D. ISO 25600 is my new BFF.  |
|
|
|
|
12-27-2012, 06:40 AM
|
#4 |
|
DIS Veteran
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Elgin, Il.
Posts: 3,179
|
Like the others, the first "looks" better, but appears out of focus. the 'B' version is over exposed and could have used a polarizing filter to cut down the glare.
|
|
|
|
|
12-27-2012, 08:26 AM
|
#5 |
|
DIS Veteran
Join Date: Aug 2010
Posts: 2,951
|
Agree with others... First is better, second is blown out. I don't think the focus is really so bad, but perhaps stopping down the aperture may have sharpened it up a bit.
|
|
|
|
|
12-27-2012, 08:38 AM
|
#6 |
|
DIS Veteran
Join Date: Oct 2012
Posts: 4,654
|
Agree....definetly the first one.
__________________
  |
|
|
|
|
12-27-2012, 10:52 PM
|
#7 |
|
Mouseketeer
Join Date: Jun 2012
Posts: 439
|
 thanks. the first one is the photoshoped one.
__________________
|
|
|
|
 |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | Rate This Thread |
|
|
Linear Mode
