Disney Information Station Logo

Go Back   The DIS Discussion Forums - DISboards.com > Disney Trip Planning Forums > Disney Rumors and News
Find Hotel Specials & DIScounts
 
facebooktwitterpinterestgoogle plusyoutubeDIS UpdatesDIS email updates
Register Chat FAQ Tickers Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read





Reply
 
Thread Tools Rate Thread Display Modes
Old 04-30-2013, 03:55 PM   #46
Traveliz
DIS Veteran
 
Traveliz's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2000
Posts: 8,071

I have never ever had a Disney hotel guard gate cm or check on cm ask for the ID of any more than one person in the car and it has been fine for the ID to come from any one in the car.

Loz
Traveliz is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-30-2013, 03:59 PM   #47
Tonka's Skipper
DIS Veteran
 
Tonka's Skipper's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: Connecticut in the Good Ole USA
Posts: 4,423

Quote:
Originally Posted by Traveliz View Post
I have never ever had a Disney hotel guard gate cm or check on cm ask for the ID of any more than one person in the car and it has been fine for the ID to come from any one in the car.

Loz
Never had a gate guard ask!

AKK
Tonka's Skipper is offline   Reply With Quote
|
The DIS
Register to remove

Join Date: 1997
Location: Orlando, FL
Posts: 1,000,000
Old 04-30-2013, 04:52 PM   #48
Lewisc

DIS Veteran
 
Join Date: May 2000
Posts: 18,328

I'm still waiting for T Skipper's link documenting a FL law requiring photo ID from every guest checking into a room.

I'll retract my previous statement if he will supply documentation regarding any new policy which allows merchants to require photo ID (normal circumstances) as a requirement for customers.
Lewisc is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-30-2013, 10:26 PM   #49
leeg229
Mouseketeer
 
leeg229's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2011
Location: South Jersey
Posts: 359

Quote:
Originally Posted by Lewisc View Post
I'm still waiting for T Skipper's link documenting a FL law requiring photo ID from every guest checking into a room.

I'll retract my previous statement if he will supply documentation regarding any new policy which allows merchants to require photo ID (normal circumstances) as a requirement for customers.
I can't speak to checking into a room, but I know that when you make a merchandise purchase in WDW greater than $50 we're supposed to ask for a valid ID to check against the name on the card. Very few of us actually did. I only did when it was a rather large total. If the guest refused we were allowed to cancel the sale or we could call one of our leaders to resolve the situation. This is not law, but a disney guideline for merchandise.
__________________
WDWCP Spring Adv 2012 Feb 6th - Aug 10th Hollywood Studios Merchandise- Sunset Animation
WDWCP Fall Adv 2013 May 13th - Jan 3rd 2014 Magic Kingdom Merchandise- Emporium
Part Time Magic Kingdom Emporium Area Trainer
leeg229 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-01-2013, 12:45 AM   #50
arthropodtodd
Mouseketeer
 
arthropodtodd's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: kansas
Posts: 199

why I want to chime in here

So I wanted to chime in here for second as this is a field I have experience with professionally. I have spent the last 5 years working with my state's sexual offender program, working with federal sexual offenders, and community corrections sexual offenders as a licensed therapist. I am a member of ATSA (Assoc. for the Treatment of Sexual Abusers). I have worked with offenders both in prison and out prison, either on parole or probation. I have accessed some 50 individuals for courts and probation offices. So not to toot my own horn, but I know what I am talking about on this subject. I have sat with men who are truly pedophiles, I have sat with men who raped, and murdered their victims. I know my stuff.

First, the registries do not tell the whole story and these registries are what Disney, as any person, would have access to. Granted Disney can do more research and has more resources available to them, but that takes time to pull together, not something that could be done at the gate. Also, every state posts different information on their registry. Some use levels, 1, 2 or 3, some do not. Some only post the offense while others post victim information. And many states are either moving to removed certain offenses off the registries or allow people to qualify to be removed off the public registry. The Feds have tried and failed to get the states to use the same standards in classification and length on the registry. The Adam Walsh Act was supposed to make things better, but many states either did not pass it or modified it. I will skip whether public registries are worthwhile or not.

Now Disney could do the extra work to find out what really happened in each case. But that would be time consuming and something that would take more time than they use to turn these individuals away. They might look them up, but in reality they first rely on the fact that many states identify their offenders on their state IDs or driver'd license. In my state it used to be in big red letters "registered offender" but since we also register violent (murder) offenders and those who cook meth, they changed it to "RSO" in smaller red letters. For those who either are failing to register or whose state does not mark their ID, Disney probably runs names against several various lists. Ever think they get access to the persons of interest/watch lists/do not fly lists? Of course they do to some degree.

As with most all criminals, no two sex offenders are alike. There is difference between the 18 and 15 year couple (Romeo and Juliet), the doped out of their mind offenders, the angry rapist, child molesters, and pedophiles. However, sexual offenders have a lower recidivism rate than other offenders. Why? Because sexual offenders are typically required to attend treatment either in and/or out of prison and most of what they report, in terms of behavior, is varied with a polygraph. So in my state around 3 to 4% of all convicted offenders are ever re-convicted. The national average is higher, but we have been doing a good job here. Our treatment focuses on identifying their risk areas and developing a treatment plan to lower their risk in the community.

Also, most states civilly commit their worst offenders, their predators.

I suspect Disney does this for two reasons, PR and liability. I say that because statistics tell us that only 50% of all sexual offenses are ever reported. Of that 50% only around 16% of those lead to a conviction. So for every 75 they turn around, think of how many unconvicted and unreported offenders walk through those gates. Up to 25% of women and up to 15% of men were sexually abused as children. The numbers are astounding.

Now any offender who goes to Disney is kidding themselves. They do not have any concept of their actual risk or are using some though distortion, justification, minimization, etc., to make it okay to be there. Any offender who has a minor victim, should avoid certain places for at least 10 years. After 10 years the rate of re-offense drops to next to nothing. So this is a good policy, because only a dumb offender would go to Disney.
__________________
Todd

WL 2004 - Wedding and Honeymoon there
WL - 2006
WL - 2009
CR - 2011
WL - 2012
WL Club Level - 2013
WL - 2014

Coming next:
December 2014 - the whole family

In the pipe:
2015
2016
arthropodtodd is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-01-2013, 12:48 AM   #51
arthropodtodd
Mouseketeer
 
arthropodtodd's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: kansas
Posts: 199

also,

every time i have check in they have asked for my ID and credit card even when you have already paid before arrival. It is about liability.
__________________
Todd

WL 2004 - Wedding and Honeymoon there
WL - 2006
WL - 2009
CR - 2011
WL - 2012
WL Club Level - 2013
WL - 2014

Coming next:
December 2014 - the whole family

In the pipe:
2015
2016
arthropodtodd is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-01-2013, 01:06 AM   #52
Paula Sedley-Burke
Proud to believe in Rainbows and Unicorns...
 
Paula Sedley-Burke's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Essex, UK
Posts: 4,553

Sorry I just joined this thread and I did read through but couldn't find answer to my question. Does anyone know what the policy is for Disney CruiseLine? This is something that has always troubled me. Do they check guests for sexual offences does anyone know? Also I was thinking what about International guests. We don't print in the UK on driving licenses if somebody has such an offence far as I know.
__________________
Dixie Landings 2000, Port Orleans 08, SSR 09, SSR 10, SSR 11, Disney Dream 2011, SSR 12, Disney Dream 2012 , AKL 13, SSR 13 , VWL 13, Disney Dream 2013, POR 2014, SSR 14, AKV 14, BCV 14, , Disney Dream 2014, VGF 14, AoA 15, Disney Magic 15, SSR 14, VGF 14

May 2014 Pre trip report - http://www.disboards.com/showthread.php?t=3236860

( Me ) , (DW)

Paula
Paula Sedley-Burke is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-01-2013, 08:12 AM   #53
eadavis
Mickey is my Homeboy
 
eadavis's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Posts: 411

Quote:
I'm still waiting for T Skipper's link documenting a FL law requiring photo ID from every guest checking into a room.
So having worked in hotels in Florida, that is NOT a law. We required an ID from the "lead guest" on the reservation to verify that they were who they said they were. If they couldn't provide an ID for whatever reason, they had to verify a LONG list of information.

Having sold tickets for WDW, we required an ID when guests wanted to buy tickets at a Florida Resident Discount. Granted, "ID" is a very loose term in this sense as they only had to show they had a Florida Address (think DMV-like requirements, utility bill, bank statement, etc.). Or they had to show a military ID for those discounts.

With Disney, or in any other company, they can refuse service or sale. The only people that can "ban" or trespass guests, is Law Enforcement.

If the Company wants to take a stance on preventing those with criminial backgrounds access, it is a logistical nightmare. What are they going to do, background check every guest before entry? The lines are long enough...

And then come the legal rammifications...

The first guest who gets denied entry...the Sentinel will have a picture of his kids crying on the front page...very bad PR...


Common sense people...
eadavis is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-01-2013, 08:28 AM   #54
Lewisc

DIS Veteran
 
Join Date: May 2000
Posts: 18,328

Quote:
Originally Posted by Paula Sedley-Burke View Post
Sorry I just joined this thread and I did read through but couldn't find answer to my question. Does anyone know what the policy is for Disney CruiseLine? This is something that has always troubled me. Do they check guests for sexual offences does anyone know? Also I was thinking what about International guests. We don't print in the UK on driving licenses if somebody has such an offence far as I know.
The problem with cruise lines is with the crew. Crew members are recruited from foreign countries. There have been "issues" with crew members industry wide. I have no idea if DCL does a better job of screening then other cruise lines.

A cruise would be an expensive way for a pedophile to troll for victims as a passenger. Doesn't sound like a smart way either. Parents are likely to be relatively near.

Last edited by Lewisc; 05-01-2013 at 08:34 AM.
Lewisc is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-01-2013, 08:32 AM   #55
Lewisc

DIS Veteran
 
Join Date: May 2000
Posts: 18,328

Quote:
Originally Posted by eadavis View Post
So having worked in hotels in Florida, that is NOT a law. We required an ID from the "lead guest" on the reservation to verify that they were who they said they were. If they couldn't provide an ID for whatever reason, they had to verify a LONG list of information.0

Common sense people...
T Skipper insisted there is such a law. Requested I use google to prove there isn't such a law.

I'm still asking him to provide a link.

I'm not doubting the information you posted but T Skipper seems to be convinced he's right. I'm giving him a chance to prove us wrong.
Lewisc is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-01-2013, 08:38 AM   #56
tjkraz

DVC Owner SSR
 
tjkraz's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: Ohio
Posts: 13,109

Quote:
Originally Posted by arthropodtodd View Post
I suspect Disney does this for two reasons, PR and liability.
Interesting thing is, this only came to light as a result of a local news report. Disney issued 75 warnings in 2012...and didn't bring any attention to the fact. And when asked about it, they declined to comment.

So they don't seem to be bending over backward to exploit this as a PR move.

At the end of the day, I really don't care what their motivation might be.
__________________
-- Tim

DVC owner at SSR, BWV and VGC
tjkraz is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 05-01-2013, 08:49 AM   #57
Paula Sedley-Burke
Proud to believe in Rainbows and Unicorns...
 
Paula Sedley-Burke's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Essex, UK
Posts: 4,553

Quote:
Originally Posted by Lewisc View Post

The problem with cruise lines is with the crew. Crew members are recruited from foreign countries. There have been "issues" with crew members industry wide. I have no idea if DCL does a better job of screening then other cruise lines.

A cruise would be an expensive way for a pedophile to troll for victims as a passenger. Doesn't sound like a smart way either. Parents are likely to be relatively near.
Yes these are good points. Thank you.
__________________
Dixie Landings 2000, Port Orleans 08, SSR 09, SSR 10, SSR 11, Disney Dream 2011, SSR 12, Disney Dream 2012 , AKL 13, SSR 13 , VWL 13, Disney Dream 2013, POR 2014, SSR 14, AKV 14, BCV 14, , Disney Dream 2014, VGF 14, AoA 15, Disney Magic 15, SSR 14, VGF 14

May 2014 Pre trip report - http://www.disboards.com/showthread.php?t=3236860

( Me ) , (DW)

Paula
Paula Sedley-Burke is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-01-2013, 09:06 AM   #58
Tonka's Skipper
DIS Veteran
 
Tonka's Skipper's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: Connecticut in the Good Ole USA
Posts: 4,423

I am amazed how I am *required* to prove to anyone what I know form experience. Anyone else interested in looking it up themselves is welcome to.

I point here is that this is a good start to protect our families and kids from predators.

Disney as the names and addresses of AP holders, resort guests and 50 states with predators online to check for predators. It is not 100%, there are ways around it, but its a start.

To sit back and say don't do anything because its not 100% is silly and dangerous.

To say because the online predators sites are not perfect with a very few states having silly rules about teens and pissing in bush's,(which are slowly being changed) we should not use them and not do anything is equally silly.

As time goes on and techno and laws get better, the policy will work better.

However I would much rather Disney continue and protect guests as much as possible and then throw there hands in the air and do nothing.


I would also point out that Disney can ban anyone at anytime, they simply call law enforcement and press charges. I really don't see much sympathy for a predator/sex offender being kept out of Disney. If anything most people will applaud and a PR plus.


Disney as at last report kept 75 + sex predators out of the parks.......not one complaint, no news paper saying let them in! A predator/sex offender bringing his family and getting caught and refused entry, has no one but himself to blame. The kids should have been brought by the spouse or other person.

AKK
Tonka's Skipper is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-01-2013, 09:10 AM   #59
robinb
DIS Veteran
 
Join Date: Aug 1999
Location: Madison, WI
Posts: 30,836

Quote:
Originally Posted by arthropodtodd View Post
So I wanted to chime in here for second as this is a field I have experience with professionally. I have spent the last 5 years working with my state's sexual offender program, working with federal sexual offenders, and community corrections sexual offenders as a licensed therapist. I am a member of ATSA (Assoc. for the Treatment of Sexual Abusers). I have worked with offenders both in prison and out prison, either on parole or probation. I have accessed some 50 individuals for courts and probation offices. So not to toot my own horn, but I know what I am talking about on this subject. I have sat with men who are truly pedophiles, I have sat with men who raped, and murdered their victims. I know my stuff.

First, the registries do not tell the whole story and these registries are what Disney, as any person, would have access to. Granted Disney can do more research and has more resources available to them, but that takes time to pull together, not something that could be done at the gate. Also, every state posts different information on their registry. Some use levels, 1, 2 or 3, some do not. Some only post the offense while others post victim information. And many states are either moving to removed certain offenses off the registries or allow people to qualify to be removed off the public registry. The Feds have tried and failed to get the states to use the same standards in classification and length on the registry. The Adam Walsh Act was supposed to make things better, but many states either did not pass it or modified it. I will skip whether public registries are worthwhile or not.

Now Disney could do the extra work to find out what really happened in each case. But that would be time consuming and something that would take more time than they use to turn these individuals away. They might look them up, but in reality they first rely on the fact that many states identify their offenders on their state IDs or driver'd license. In my state it used to be in big red letters "registered offender" but since we also register violent (murder) offenders and those who cook meth, they changed it to "RSO" in smaller red letters. For those who either are failing to register or whose state does not mark their ID, Disney probably runs names against several various lists. Ever think they get access to the persons of interest/watch lists/do not fly lists? Of course they do to some degree.

As with most all criminals, no two sex offenders are alike. There is difference between the 18 and 15 year couple (Romeo and Juliet), the doped out of their mind offenders, the angry rapist, child molesters, and pedophiles. However, sexual offenders have a lower recidivism rate than other offenders. Why? Because sexual offenders are typically required to attend treatment either in and/or out of prison and most of what they report, in terms of behavior, is varied with a polygraph. So in my state around 3 to 4% of all convicted offenders are ever re-convicted. The national average is higher, but we have been doing a good job here. Our treatment focuses on identifying their risk areas and developing a treatment plan to lower their risk in the community.

Also, most states civilly commit their worst offenders, their predators.

I suspect Disney does this for two reasons, PR and liability. I say that because statistics tell us that only 50% of all sexual offenses are ever reported. Of that 50% only around 16% of those lead to a conviction. So for every 75 they turn around, think of how many unconvicted and unreported offenders walk through those gates. Up to 25% of women and up to 15% of men were sexually abused as children. The numbers are astounding.

Now any offender who goes to Disney is kidding themselves. They do not have any concept of their actual risk or are using some though distortion, justification, minimization, etc., to make it okay to be there. Any offender who has a minor victim, should avoid certain places for at least 10 years. After 10 years the rate of re-offense drops to next to nothing. So this is a good policy, because only a dumb offender would go to Disney.
Thank you Todd for your well thought out and well written reply. You certainly do sound like you know what you are talking about . I do have a question about the end of your post:

Quote:
Now any offender who goes to Disney is kidding themselves. They do not have any concept of their actual risk or are using some though distortion, justification, minimization, etc., to make it okay to be there. Any offender who has a minor victim, should avoid certain places for at least 10 years. After 10 years the rate of re-offense drops to next to nothing. So this is a good policy, because only a dumb offender would go to Disney.
it sounds like an offender with a minor victim should be precluded from going to a place with many children (like a theme park) by his/her terms of probation. I would assume that if they violate terms of probation (and go to WDW) they will go to jail. Is that true? If so, I am all for that! However, I am confused about applying the same standard to violators without minor victims. Are you saying that its' not OK for them to go to a theme park, or do you think there should be a more general restriction that covers all places with many people gather (theme parks, concerts, festivals, etc)? I guess I'm trying to figure out the difference between WDW and say ... Summerfest in Milwaukee.
robinb is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-01-2013, 09:14 AM   #60
Tonka's Skipper
DIS Veteran
 
Tonka's Skipper's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: Connecticut in the Good Ole USA
Posts: 4,423

Quote:
Originally Posted by Paula Sedley-Burke View Post
Yes these are good points. Thank you.
The cruise line problem is not with the crews. There have been very few problems. Just because a CM comes from a foreign country, doesn't means they are not vetted and checked. It is 100% perfect.......no!

The real problem would be the passengers, and there have been a problems here.

The big advantage is every passenger has to be ID'ed and vetted. So their history is easy to discover.

Now do lines check?? , are some predators refused boarding??, this I do not know, but I would hope they are.


AKK
Tonka's Skipper is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply



Thread Tools
Display Modes Rate This Thread
Rate This Thread:

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

facebooktwitterpinterestgoogle plusyoutubeDIS Updates
GET OUR DIS UPDATES DELIVERED BY EMAIL



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 09:19 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2014, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.

Copyright © 1997-2014, Werner Technologies, LLC. All Rights Reserved.

You Rated this Thread: