Disney Information Station Logo

Go Back   The DIS Discussion Forums - DISboards.com > Disney Trip Planning Forums > Disney Rumors and News
Find Hotel Specials & DIScounts
 
facebooktwitterpinterestgoogle plusyoutubeDIS UpdatesDIS email updates
Register Chat FAQ Tickers Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read





Reply
 
Thread Tools Rate Thread Display Modes
Old 04-16-2013, 02:54 AM   #1
Tonka's Skipper
DIS Veteran
 
Tonka's Skipper's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: Connecticut in the Good Ole USA
Posts: 4,463

New Twist on a 5th Vessel

In today's Walt Disney World Update on Mouseplanet they briefly talked about the fifth and sixth ship rumor. However... in the comments at the bottom was this comment by author Jeff Kober --

http://www.mouseplanet.com/10319/Wal..._Resort_Update

"By Jeff Kober on Mon, 15 Apr 2013 03:42:08 -0700
Actually, my inside sources have not confirmed a sixth ship, but have confirmed a fifth ship, and that one is to be a much smaller ship that will allow Disney Cruise Line to charter smaller river itineraries like the Columbia or the Rhine. But it wouldn't surprise me that they would get a bigger bang for their investment to have two ships made, as it will reduce some of the overhead when shared."

What does every one think?
Tonka's Skipper is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-16-2013, 06:26 AM   #2
OKW Lover

Yes, we love Old Key West
Connoisseur of the fine things in life, and has the time to enjoy them (Just ask his wife)
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: 2 miles north of the Castle!
Posts: 20,938

Not seeing that happening. I think DCL needs the larger size of ship to spread some fairly significant costs out over more passengers. Costs like building in the Disney "magic" touches that guests will expect.
__________________
OKW Lover is online now   Reply With Quote
|
The DIS
Register to remove

Join Date: 1997
Location: Orlando, FL
Posts: 1,000,000
Old 04-16-2013, 07:43 AM   #3
Lynne G
DIS Veteran
 
Lynne G's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Posts: 1,317

hmm,
All rumors seem to peg the new ships as being larger and smaller than the existing ships. Why river travel? Would think Alaska, Pacific, and Europe would be more interesting, but not on a river. Wonder which port this 1 or 2 ships will call home. Florida? More to PC? Would they consider LA again, with DL so close? With Mexico a no go, then maybe Northern Pacific or Alaska from Canada. They seem to like the Med, so maybe one to entice the European customers?
Lynne G is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-16-2013, 08:48 AM   #4
rteetz
DIS Veteran
 
rteetz's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2013
Location: Wisconsin
Posts: 3,007

Disney needs to go bigger. Just look at the very successful royal carribean every ship they build is bigger and better. I believe that is exactly what disney needs to do. They need to accommodate more as well as offer new and exciting activities on these new ships. Each ship needs to have its own unique things, just like the hotels in Florida. I think disney ships are amazing but to go smaller would just be a bad thing for disney to do.
__________________
Eat, Sleep, Disney!



rteetz is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-16-2013, 03:26 PM   #5
N365PA
First rule of the bayou: never take directions from a gator.
 
N365PA's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: Anchorage / AKV / Disney Wonder
Posts: 524

The only way I see a river vessel working is in conjunction with Adventures by Disney. I would expect another Panama Canal capable vessel in the future if anything at all.
__________________
Clint
Upcoming Trips:
Sep 29-Oct 7: AKV-Kidani Disney World
June 29-July 10: Copenhagen-Dover Disney Magic

N365PA is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-16-2013, 07:48 PM   #6
beachclub
Mouseketeer
 
Join Date: Oct 2010
Posts: 321

This better be true. Cause if you haven't seen the new ships coming out of Royal carribbean next year and the year after....they are majorly one upping Disney, big time.
I mean, you get a virtual porthole by disney. Royal one ups that with virtual Balconies. Halls that convert to theatres, huge rooms...etc
beachclub is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-17-2013, 08:21 AM   #7
DRDISNEYMD
*+*+*+*+*+*+*+*+*+*+* *+*~The Snow Queen~*+* ~A girl should be two things: *+*~Classy & Fabulous~*+* +*+*~Coco Chanel~*+*+*+ *+*+*+*+*+*+*+*+*+*+*
 
DRDISNEYMD's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Posts: 2,482

Quote:
Originally Posted by Tonka's Skipper View Post
In today's Walt Disney World Update on Mouseplanet they briefly talked about the fifth and sixth ship rumor. However... in the comments at the bottom was this comment by author Jeff Kober --

http://www.mouseplanet.com/10319/Wal..._Resort_Update

"By Jeff Kober on Mon, 15 Apr 2013 03:42:08 -0700
Actually, my inside sources have not confirmed a sixth ship, but have confirmed a fifth ship, and that one is to be a much smaller ship that will allow Disney Cruise Line to charter smaller river itineraries like the Columbia or the Rhine. But it wouldn't surprise me that they would get a bigger bang for their investment to have two ships made, as it will reduce some of the overhead when shared."

What does every one think?
~Thanks for the update! But, I really can't imagine, okay I just don't want a "smaller" ship, I want this "girl" to be grand, as in huge!

~Again, for this to be "monstrous" news there needs to be monstrous boats, preferably two -- otherwise it's just news. We'll see.

~As an aside, I can't help but think this "monstrous" news thing may have more to do with something Monsters U -- oh, I don't know, lol.
__________________

DRDISNEYMD is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-17-2013, 08:31 AM   #8
Tonka's Skipper
DIS Veteran
 
Tonka's Skipper's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: Connecticut in the Good Ole USA
Posts: 4,463

Quote:
Originally Posted by beachclub View Post
This better be true. Cause if you haven't seen the new ships coming out of Royal carribbean next year and the year after....they are majorly one upping Disney, big time.
I mean, you get a virtual porthole by disney. Royal one ups that with virtual Balconies. Halls that convert to theatres, huge rooms...etc

Well when you build a monster sized ship, you have more space. When you build a monster size ship you need to fill them up and copy things other lines have done....EI the virtual effect.

I do think the changeable room space is would be cool.


I am not a fan of the monster size vessel. a personal and professional opinion.to each their own. I would point out that my opinion is shared by many other folks. While RCCL seems to feel they have the cruisers to fill these vessels, there doesn't(to my knowledge) seem to be any other lines looking to build this big.

I am happy to see they enclosed the open stern on the new vessels.


JMHO

AKK
Tonka's Skipper is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-17-2013, 08:37 AM   #9
arthuruscg
DIS Veteran
 
arthuruscg's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2011
Location: Southern MD
Posts: 576

One thing to keep in mind, the longer the hull of displacement ships the faster it can go for a given amount of drag.
So, if DCL wants to go to places farther away in less time, the ships will get bigger to save on fuel.
I suspect the new ships will meet the New Panamax sizes. Max ship size to pass thru the Panama Canal, 1,400 ft, beam 180 ft, depth 60 ft and height 198ft . This will place the ships shorter then the 2 new Royal Caribbean ships but will allow DCL to run WDW to Disney California cruises thru the Panama Canal.
__________________
DEC 2012 FW
MAY 2012 POFQ, OCT 2011 AKL KV, OCT 2010 ALM
Memory Issues
Entire Child hood Fort Wilderness Campground
arthuruscg is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-17-2013, 08:44 AM   #10
Tonka's Skipper
DIS Veteran
 
Tonka's Skipper's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: Connecticut in the Good Ole USA
Posts: 4,463

Lots of good points made about the riverboats..........I share your general feeling this is a long shot at best.

There is one steam riverboat running on the American inland rivers.....EI Mississippi, etc...........from what I have read she is well received, and expensive!


http://www.americancruiselines.com/F...-river-cruises


Time will tell!


AKK
Tonka's Skipper is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-17-2013, 07:35 PM   #11
beachclub
Mouseketeer
 
Join Date: Oct 2010
Posts: 321

Sure they've copied the concept but they made it better, and among other things it actually seems there will be alot more activities than what Disney has to offer. Don't get me wrong, I have always been a disney cruiser but with these 2 new vessels by RC "copies" its enough to peak my interest, Sure i'm not the only one.
Actually the virtual port hole concept is really the only "copied" concept.
It's not like the concept itself was a huge game changer for the disney fleet anyways to claim the king of innovation.
The Quantum will also have what I guess I'll call a sort of thrill ride that Disney will prob copy from them in the future.
I don't think they "feel" the need to build bigger. Usually in business, if the demand is there they they accommodate, I don't think they are building these for the heck of it, the demand must be there, im sure my opinion is shared by many others as well.

Disney can't always be the leader in every business, and it appears Royal Caribbean has a leg up in this one.

This somewhat battle of RC vs DCL reminds me of something that has been slowly and shyly creeping around for a while. Disney "used to be" a very imaginative company, but there is alot of imagination missing and alot of it purposely left at the door in the name of profit greediness.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Tonka's Skipper View Post
Well when you build a monster sized ship, you have more space. When you build a monster size ship you need to fill them up and copy things other lines have done....EI the virtual effect.

I do think the changeable room space is would be cool.


I am not a fan of the monster size vessel. a personal and professional opinion.to each their own. I would point out that my opinion is shared by many other folks. While RCCL seems to feel they have the cruisers to fill these vessels, there doesn't(to my knowledge) seem to be any other lines looking to build this big.

I am happy to see they enclosed the open stern on the new vessels.


JMHO

AKK
beachclub is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-18-2013, 05:53 AM   #12
Tonka's Skipper
DIS Veteran
 
Tonka's Skipper's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: Connecticut in the Good Ole USA
Posts: 4,463

Quote:
Originally Posted by beachclub View Post
Sure they've copied the concept but they made it better, and among other things it actually seems there will be alot more activities than what Disney has to offer. Don't get me wrong, I have always been a disney cruiser but with these 2 new vessels by RC "copies" its enough to peak my interest, Sure i'm not the only one.
Actually the virtual port hole concept is really the only "copied" concept.
It's not like the concept itself was a huge game changer for the disney fleet anyways to claim the king of innovation.
The Quantum will also have what I guess I'll call a sort of thrill ride that Disney will prob copy from them in the future.
I don't think they "feel" the need to build bigger. Usually in business, if the demand is there they they accommodate, I don't think they are building these for the heck of it, the demand must be there, im sure my opinion is shared by many others as well.

Disney can't always be the leader in every business, and it appears Royal Caribbean has a leg up in this one.

This somewhat battle of RC vs DCL reminds me of something that has been slowly and shyly creeping around for a while. Disney "used to be" a very imaginative company, but there is alot of imagination missing and alot of it purposely left at the door in the name of profit greediness.



I agree the last 5 to 10 years Disney has been run by the bean counters, but it you look at the last 2 or 3 , things are changing.

Seems the imaginers are back in the drivers seat........IE Cars land is excellently done. The many plans drifting around for WDW parks............well will have to see what happens, but its looking promising.

Also it seems the parks management is back doing what they should have been doing, in maintaince and upgrades........many attractions have been closed for Major Refubs....not just limited ones!



As to RCL..........I enjoyed our cruise on the FOS................good cruise, but Disney is the only one that can do Disney..........DreamWorks does not compare at all.

My main point was the size of the monster ships...............I don't like the look or the height at all......I would love to see the stability calculations of the ships.

Just to many people!!!...........now I am sure a lot of people do love the size and activates on those ships.........but there are many that don't

What I find interesting, where RCCL is building 2 more.....no other lines seems to be racing to build these monster ships!


JMHO!..to each their own!
Tonka's Skipper is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-18-2013, 05:57 AM   #13
Tonka's Skipper
DIS Veteran
 
Tonka's Skipper's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: Connecticut in the Good Ole USA
Posts: 4,463

Quote:
Originally Posted by arthuruscg View Post
One thing to keep in mind, the longer the hull of displacement ships the faster it can go for a given amount of drag.
So, if DCL wants to go to places farther away in less time, the ships will get bigger to save on fuel.
I suspect the new ships will meet the New Panamax sizes. Max ship size to pass thru the Panama Canal, 1,400 ft, beam 180 ft, depth 60 ft and height 198ft . This will place the ships shorter then the 2 new Royal Caribbean ships but will allow DCL to run WDW to Disney California cruises thru the Panama Canal.
Your point on drag is well taken, but there is a lot more to be considered...........mainly..........is there enough interest in the monster size ships to fill them up!

As I just mentioned............RCCL is building 2 more, but other lines seems to be waiting and are not racing to build their own!


PS.............Don't hold your breath on the new locks...I keep hearing the are getting farther and farther behind schedule!


AKK
Tonka's Skipper is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-18-2013, 08:01 AM   #14
arthuruscg
DIS Veteran
 
arthuruscg's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2011
Location: Southern MD
Posts: 576

Quote:
Originally Posted by Tonka's Skipper View Post
Your point on drag is well taken, but there is a lot more to be considered...........mainly..........is there enough interest in the monster size ships to fill them up!

As I just mentioned............RCCL is building 2 more, but other lines seems to be waiting and are not racing to build their own!


PS.............Don't hold your breath on the new locks...I keep hearing the are getting farther and farther behind schedule!


AKK
I am thinking long term, 5-10years out.
Also the longer and shorter ships would be more stable. It would be interesting for DCL to have normal trans Atlantic cruises. The current ones are just for repositioning the fleet.

I am also assuming that Cast Away Cay was built to handle the new Panamax sizes.

RCCL is building the new ships because they are running close enough to capacity and they are hedging their bets that they will be ahead of the curve when the economy recovers. From the few people at the office that are cruise "regulars" and the few new cruisers, those that had Carnival cruises have re booked for RCCL or DCL.

FYI: The Carnival Ecstacy ship temperately lost power on Wednesday.
__________________
DEC 2012 FW
MAY 2012 POFQ, OCT 2011 AKL KV, OCT 2010 ALM
Memory Issues
Entire Child hood Fort Wilderness Campground
arthuruscg is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-18-2013, 08:32 AM   #15
Tonka's Skipper
DIS Veteran
 
Tonka's Skipper's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: Connecticut in the Good Ole USA
Posts: 4,463

Quote:
Originally Posted by arthuruscg View Post
I am thinking long term, 5-10years out.
Also the longer and shorter ships would be more stable. It would be interesting for DCL to have normal trans Atlantic cruises. The current ones are just for repositioning the fleet.

Do you really think there is enough passenger business to run a regular Atlantic service???. That is a interesting thought!

I am also assuming that Cast Away Cay was built to handle the new Panamax sizes.


As to Castaway Cay, if you look at the picture of the dream class there, those vessels pretty well fill up the dock.


RCCL is building the new ships because they are running close enough to capacity and they are hedging their bets that they will be ahead of the curve when the economy recovers. From the few people at the office that are cruise "regulars" and the few new cruisers, those that had Carnival cruises have re booked for RCCL or DCL.

I agree they are doing well with those vessels and getting premium rates as well. But filling up 2 additional vessels is the key!

I have heard all over, many Carnival line cruisers are jumping ship and heading to NCL, RCCL and DCL.


FYI: The Carnival Ecstacy ship temperately lost power on Wednesday.
I read that this morning.......that black rain cloud is over Carnival all the time! However in all fairness it was only for a hour and they were off and running.

Carnival did announce this week they are spending 300mil to make design changes, upgrades and repairs to a number of their vessels. I applaud them, even if it is late in coming and will take a year or so to complete!



AKK
Tonka's Skipper is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply



Thread Tools
Display Modes Rate This Thread
Rate This Thread:

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

facebooktwitterpinterestgoogle plusyoutubeDIS Updates
GET OUR DIS UPDATES DELIVERED BY EMAIL



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 05:39 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2014, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.

Copyright © 1997-2014, Werner Technologies, LLC. All Rights Reserved.