Disney Information Station Logo

Go Back   The DIS Discussion Forums - DISboards.com > Disney Trip Planning Forums > Disney Rumors and News
Find Hotel Specials & DIScounts
 
facebooktwitterpinterestgoogle plusyoutubeDIS UpdatesDIS email updates
Register Chat FAQ Tickers Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read





Reply
 
Thread Tools Rate Thread Display Modes
Old 04-01-2013, 09:40 PM   #106
fuzzlekins
Mouseketeer
 
fuzzlekins's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2012
Posts: 493

Quote:
Originally Posted by darrius1st View Post
Look, Disney has to do something with AK because it is the worst park and I hate SeaWorld but I would go there before AK. Truth be told the better get with the program and add other coaster or rides. In my area our region Parks such as Six Flags America and Kings Dominion add a new ride or coaster almost every other year so Disney needs to step up to the plate and knock one out of the park so to speak.
Hey neighbor! Haven't been to KD in a long time but that park always had sooo many issues with stuff getting stuck (esp. upside down!). Not a big fan of Six Flags but that has more to do with the people that visit it than the park itself. I like Hershey and Dutch Wonderland and we frequent them, but none of them compare to Disney IMO. They're amusement parks rather than theme parks. Disney does magic that KD, HP, etc. would never do. Completely different experiences to me. I don't think I could spend more than a day or 2 at any of those parks. I have yet to determine how long is "too long" in Orlando and I've done 9 straight open to close park days before.
__________________
11/4-11/12/10
2/4-2/11/12
2/1-2/9/13
1/31-2/9/14
fuzzlekins is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-07-2013, 10:18 AM   #107
StarWarsJez
Mouseketeer
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Posts: 235

Agreed, we only tend to do a half day at most at AK per trip. Disney desperately needs to do something with it but IMO Avatar is not the answer.

Irrespective of the first films gross, movie history is littered with films that died after the first sequel. Also I don't remember much else about Avatar other than the movie, eg the Avatar 'experience' never extended into other areas like Harry Potter, Star Wars, Indiana Jones, PotC (toys, computer games, lunchboxes etc. etc.). It was just the one film.......and that's it.

I wonder If Disney is just going to stall the whole project and then announce a new Star Wars project. SW has pedigree and has 'legs'. Disney knows that and was prepared to invest $4Bn to prove it.
StarWarsJez is offline   Reply With Quote
|
The DIS
Register to remove

Join Date: 1997
Location: Orlando, FL
Posts: 1,000,000
Old 04-07-2013, 10:34 AM   #108
DRDISNEYMD
*+*+*+*+*+*+*+*+*+*+* *+*~The Snow Queen~*+* ~A girl should be two things: *+*~Classy & Fabulous~*+* +*+*~Coco Chanel~*+*+*+ *+*+*+*+*+*+*+*+*+*+*
 
DRDISNEYMD's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Posts: 2,483

~OMG. This is so exciting -- I cannot wait for Avatarland! I'm looking very forward to the updates!
__________________

DRDISNEYMD is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-07-2013, 08:56 PM   #109
MissPrincessKendall
Earning My Ears
 
Join Date: Apr 2013
Location: New Jersey and Florida
Posts: 37

As for the topic of the thread at hand I have heard many rumors about avatar land the newest stating that it will consist of a thrill ride, a 3d type motion show ride, shopping, and of course food! Everyone close to the project at least from my research has said that the entire land is meant to feel almost like an attraction in the sense that it will be completely different than anything else Disney has. I know ppl think this is a bad idea I personally never saw the movie but I love what Disney always ends up with and I am extremely excited to see this new land when it opens. I do hope it still keeps the culture of AK however because I think it is by far the best park.

The post above me mentioned Star Wars and creating something with that. I have heard rumors they officially have the rights so now they are thinking about expanding the SW market in DHS apparently this rumor included a theme place for food and some other sort of interactive things.

I know ppl were mentioning Disney springs in here ( which coming from a former downtown Disney employee) I am very excited for does not mean they cannot do multiple projects at once. Disney has the resources to work on Disney springs, fantasyland, and avatar land at the same time because the phases are different.
MissPrincessKendall is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-08-2013, 11:35 AM   #110
StarWarsJez
Mouseketeer
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Posts: 235

Yes In principle Disney can do whatever they want, sure they could make Avatarland, Update Disney Studios, build a Star Wars land (they 100% own the rights). Disney Springs, etc. etc.

HOWEVER the issue is to do with the financing of this work. Like everyone Disney has to budget so it needs to get the most from their dollars. And looking back over the last 10 years they've been VERY shy in investing in the parks (at least when compared to Universal)

So this is about how much is Disney actually going to spend their cash on, on what - and over how many years
StarWarsJez is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-08-2013, 12:30 PM   #111
twebber55
DIS Veteran
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Posts: 725

to me avatar is the perfect answer for DAK

1. huge following
2. perfect fit in terms of theming ( conservation, living in harmony with nature)
3. J Cameron will push new boundaries
__________________
June 2008 OKW
July 2008 SSR
June 2009 HHI
June 2010 BWV
June 2011 VB
June 2011 BC
June 2012 BC
June 2012 THV
June 2014 BC
twebber55 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-08-2013, 05:59 PM   #112
beer dave
There are 10 kinds of people in the world-- those who understand the binary numbering system, and those who do not.
 
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: sw FL
Posts: 1,032

Quote:
Originally Posted by twebber55 View Post
to me avatar is the perfect answer for dak

1. Huge following
2. Perfect fit in terms of theming ( conservation, living in harmony with nature)
3. J cameron will push new boundaries
agreed!
beer dave is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-08-2013, 06:33 PM   #113
mrsklamc
I apologize in advance, but what is a click clack?
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Husker living in Hoosierland.
Posts: 9,524

Quote:
Originally Posted by StarWarsJez View Post
over the last 10 years they've been VERY shy in investing in the parks (at least when compared to Universal)
I'm too lazy to do the research right now but the fantasyland expansion and nextgen technology I would guess outspends Universal in recent years.
mrsklamc is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-08-2013, 06:51 PM   #114
Postal68
DIS Veteran
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Posts: 715

Quote:
Originally Posted by twebber55 View Post
to me avatar is the perfect answer for DAK

1. huge following
2. perfect fit in terms of theming ( conservation, living in harmony with nature)
3. J Cameron will push new boundaries
Huge following??

It was one crappy film that most people went to see because of the gimmicky 3D
Postal68 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-08-2013, 07:23 PM   #115
super mike b
DIS Veteran
 
Join Date: Jan 2012
Posts: 500

Quote:
Originally Posted by Postal68 View Post
Huge following??

It was one crappy film that most people went to see because of the gimmicky 3D
super mike b is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-08-2013, 08:08 PM   #116
twebber55
DIS Veteran
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Posts: 725

Quote:
Originally Posted by Postal68 View Post
Huge following??

It was one crappy film that most people went to see because of the gimmicky 3D
Riiiiiiggghhhhhtttt
__________________
June 2008 OKW
July 2008 SSR
June 2009 HHI
June 2010 BWV
June 2011 VB
June 2011 BC
June 2012 BC
June 2012 THV
June 2014 BC
twebber55 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-08-2013, 11:22 PM   #117
lockedoutlogic
DIS Veteran
 
lockedoutlogic's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Joisey
Posts: 3,888

I gotta wonder how "rotfl" is a dignified response to an opinion that could also contain a decent assessment/theory.
EDIT: sorry...don't want to single anyone out. riiiiggghhhhttt is not really a thought either

avatar did pump the imax/3-D craze quite a bit if i recall. it did kinda run with it and owes alot of its success to it.

but nonetheless...not cool.
__________________
Went there.....
Worked there....(Resort Operations)
Wed there....(EPCOT 2004)
Bought there....(SSR 2006)

Last Trip: Too Long Ago
Next Trip: Can i borrow some money to go?
Gift Shop Quality: When did we get to WalMart?
Food Quality: Only the finest free range roast chicken breast and loch dart salmon in the Kingdom


"May the Space Being bless the Free Market"

Last edited by lockedoutlogic; 04-08-2013 at 11:38 PM.
lockedoutlogic is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-08-2013, 11:30 PM   #118
twebber55
DIS Veteran
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Posts: 725

ok
__________________
June 2008 OKW
July 2008 SSR
June 2009 HHI
June 2010 BWV
June 2011 VB
June 2011 BC
June 2012 BC
June 2012 THV
June 2014 BC
twebber55 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-08-2013, 11:36 PM   #119
lockedoutlogic
DIS Veteran
 
lockedoutlogic's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Joisey
Posts: 3,888

Quote:
Originally Posted by twebber55 View Post

1. huge following
this is not the right word unless it can be proven...

"following" implies longterm interest and revenue...as in the sales from avatar related products over the last couple of years...not the initial take and home sales.

it was "successful" without debate...but "following" indicates staying power...

and since the average teen crowd that hangs out on a friday night at AMC look less normal than the aliens in the Cantina scene in Star Wars and they drive the box office...that aint much.
nor do the klingon clad comic con hacker types...

this is the heart of this and every avatarland debate on these threads to date: it made money but is it a franchise/property that is right for disney and animal kingdom...

nobody will address this head on...the two responses are:

1. it made gobs...that is not a valid answer for this argument
2. doesn't matter...if its done right it could be based on anything. maybe true...but again that doesn't address the question and puts to much faith - in my opinion - in disney's ability to create "knock out" new attractions. they aren't technologically innovative anymore and have done some pretty bad work since the Eisner/Wells era declined in the mid 90's...
look at the fantasyland: a jazzed up omnimover (first use haunted mansion 1969) ride, repurposed dumbo, repurposed barnstormer, seven dwarve ride that we all hope is cool (but little faith seems to be the stance on that currently)

so theres that.

and the other thing that gets the goat on this: that somehow the "cultural relevance" of avatar is not relevant/not of concern...
oh really? mickey mouse, star wars, marvel, harry potter, pixar....

cultural relevance is "irrelative" huh?
lets stop being stupid about this...cultural relevance and longterm profit potential is rule number one in themepark construction...just like all other media.

the most known, loved, recognized sells more crap for a longer period of time to the most people. so can we not have our head up the dark hole on this?
__________________
Went there.....
Worked there....(Resort Operations)
Wed there....(EPCOT 2004)
Bought there....(SSR 2006)

Last Trip: Too Long Ago
Next Trip: Can i borrow some money to go?
Gift Shop Quality: When did we get to WalMart?
Food Quality: Only the finest free range roast chicken breast and loch dart salmon in the Kingdom


"May the Space Being bless the Free Market"
lockedoutlogic is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-09-2013, 07:08 AM   #120
twebber55
DIS Veteran
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Posts: 725

Quote:
Originally Posted by lockedoutlogic View Post
this is not the right word unless it can be proven...

"following" implies longterm interest and revenue...as in the sales from avatar related products over the last couple of years...not the initial take and home sales.

it was "successful" without debate...but "following" indicates staying power...

and since the average teen crowd that hangs out on a friday night at AMC look less normal than the aliens in the Cantina scene in Star Wars and they drive the box office...that aint much.
nor do the klingon clad comic con hacker types...

this is the heart of this and every avatarland debate on these threads to date: it made money but is it a franchise/property that is right for disney and animal kingdom...

nobody will address this head on...the two responses are:

1. it made gobs...that is not a valid answer for this argument
2. doesn't matter...if its done right it could be based on anything. maybe true...but again that doesn't address the question and puts to much faith - in my opinion - in disney's ability to create "knock out" new attractions. they aren't technologically innovative anymore and have done some pretty bad work since the Eisner/Wells era declined in the mid 90's...
look at the fantasyland: a jazzed up omnimover (first use haunted mansion 1969) ride, repurposed dumbo, repurposed barnstormer, seven dwarve ride that we all hope is cool (but little faith seems to be the stance on that currently)

so theres that.

and the other thing that gets the goat on this: that somehow the "cultural relevance" of avatar is not relevant/not of concern...
oh really? mickey mouse, star wars, marvel, harry potter, pixar....

cultural relevance is "irrelative" huh?
lets stop being stupid about this...cultural relevance and longterm profit potential is rule number one in themepark construction...just like all other media.

the most known, loved, recognized sells more crap for a longer period of time to the most people. so can we not have our head up the dark hole on this?
first i just want to say these are fun but really pointless arguments...nobody knows for sure what will happen but ill counter a couple of your points

Star wars (maybe the best franchise of all time has the 4th most popular ride in DHS...after the refurb the first day it had a 30 minute wait so IP isnt necessarily the most important thing here

Second, there have now been two movies that have come out that compare themselves to avatar while advertising if avatar didnt matter this wouold not be the case

thirdly there are tons of web sites out there for avatar literally..people went into a depression because they couldnt visit pandora

fourth regardless what you deem a good "fit" the powers that be seem to think so... i mean the entire message of the movie is about conservation and living with harmony with nature...this just in it wasn't about space aliens and humans fighting

i (along with others) have given FACTS about its popularity 2.8 billion gross 9 academy award nominations 3 wins, comparisons to other movies, high scores on rotten tomatoes etc i too have yet to hear a reason thats valid and can be proven as fact as to why it shouldnt be built other than "i hated the movie its a dumb idea" or "its not worthy of an attraction" both of which typically comes from people who didnt like the movie... thats fine i didnt like the mummy but its a great attraction, the simpsons i cant stand but the ride is fun, twilight zone was cheesy yet its one of disney s great rides

i think it compares favorably to Cars and cars land... if its done right it will be successful like cars land if its not given a proper budget than maybe not all we can do now is wait and see what it is

i suggest we all keep an open mind and actually see it first before we judge...anyway im done on this its pointless
__________________
June 2008 OKW
July 2008 SSR
June 2009 HHI
June 2010 BWV
June 2011 VB
June 2011 BC
June 2012 BC
June 2012 THV
June 2014 BC
twebber55 is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply



Thread Tools
Display Modes Rate This Thread
Rate This Thread:

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

facebooktwitterpinterestgoogle plusyoutubeDIS Updates
GET OUR DIS UPDATES DELIVERED BY EMAIL



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 09:55 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2014, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.

Copyright © 1997-2014, Werner Technologies, LLC. All Rights Reserved.