Go Back   The DIS Discussion Forums - DISboards.com > Disney Trip Planning Forums > The DIS Unplugged Podcast
Find Hotel Specials & DIScounts
 
facebooktwitterpinterestgoogle plusyoutubeDIS UpdatesDIS email updates
Register Chat FAQ Tickers Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read





Reply
 
Thread Tools Rate Thread Display Modes
Old 11-01-2012, 08:33 PM   #1
disneydad78
DDC #106
More important its about having some FUN!
We just LOVE its a small world!!;)
 
disneydad78's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Pineville,La
Posts: 849

4.05 billion dollars worth it?

I love Star Wars and Lucas films. 4.05 billion ? Maybe thats why Disney had a LARGE increase in the cost of things over the last several years.

Can anyone help shead some light on why that 4.05 billion dollar investment was a good one for Disney. Not looking to be flamed on, I just dont understand why. Why tell the public due to rising cost of "x" we have to raise the prices on everything by "x" and then go buy Lucas films for 4.05 billion. He has been riding Star Wars and Indian Jones forever. Nothing really new or cutting edge in years. Now I love me some Star Wars and Indian Jones so dont yell at me, IM a fan. Just 4.05 billion and my dang turkey leg cost me $$$$$ (can you hear the cash register in the background, KA-CHING!)

I know Disney had some coin in the bank, but DANG. Help a brother out and let me bring my kids to WDW more often, without having to take a loan out to pay for it.

and yes , we ARE going back this Dec. MAN I love that place! Maybe Pete, Kevin, Corey will ride the new Test Track with me!!!HEY HEY!!! just PM me guys! GEAUX TIGERS!
__________________
DISDADS member #106
(DD 16)(DS 12)(DS 8)(DW 32)(ME 35)
OffSite ('92) OffSite ('05) BonnetCreek ('07) BonnetCreek ('08) POR ('09) POR ('10) POR MVMCP ('11) POR MVMCP ('12) upcoming POR MNSSHP ('13)

Last edited by disneydad78; 11-01-2012 at 08:39 PM.
disneydad78 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-01-2012, 08:41 PM   #2
Cheshire Figment
Friend of Figment
 
Cheshire Figment's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: Poinciana, FL (20 miles to WDW)
Posts: 38,492

1. Six current SW films.

2. When they bring out episodes 7, 8, and 9 not only will they get the new episodes, but there will be reuns of the older ones.

3. Industrial Light and Magic.Which dos congtract work for other studioc.

4. Indiana Jones. True that the current films are under contract to a different distribution company, but that will not affct any new films.

5. Merchandise.
__________________
41 WDW Stays Totaling 321 nights between 1987 and mid-2003. (When "commuting" from Northern Virginia.)

Now Working Part Time at Walt Disney World! Currently at Everything Pop Merchandise after nine years in Guest Services/Ticket Sales.

A few very helpful links which are on DisBoards:
Everything About WDW Tickets and this one disABILITIES FAQs
Cheshire Figment is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-01-2012, 08:44 PM   #3
davedmaine
DIS Veteran
 
Join Date: Mar 2011
Posts: 1,964

Disney is a public company. Its main objective is to make money for shareholders, not to be a budget vacation spot.
They charge what they charge at the parks because they can -- people pay it. This Star Wars investment will pay for itself many times over. The first film will likely do over a billion dollars internationally.
davedmaine is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-01-2012, 08:44 PM   #4
AndyPok1
Back in MCO!
To answer the other question, getting along is boring
I like tacos
 
Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: Orlando, FL
Posts: 320

Simple. They'll make the money back within the decade, and then some on top of it.

They bough Marvel for the same amount almost exactly 3 years ago, and that is paying off. They bought Pixar 3 years before that for 7 billion, and that is paying off. Saying that they're going to release new Star Wars movies... The last 3 films made 2.5 billion at the box office alone. Obviously that isn't all profit, but when you add in merchandising and dvd/blu-ray sales after the fact, they'll have made the 4 billion back before you realize it.

It's an investment.
AndyPok1 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-01-2012, 08:53 PM   #5
disneydad78
DDC #106
More important its about having some FUN!
We just LOVE its a small world!!;)
 
disneydad78's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Pineville,La
Posts: 849

But my turkey leg $$$$$$
__________________
DISDADS member #106
(DD 16)(DS 12)(DS 8)(DW 32)(ME 35)
OffSite ('92) OffSite ('05) BonnetCreek ('07) BonnetCreek ('08) POR ('09) POR ('10) POR MVMCP ('11) POR MVMCP ('12) upcoming POR MNSSHP ('13)
disneydad78 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-01-2012, 09:13 PM   #6
AndyPok1
Back in MCO!
To answer the other question, getting along is boring
I like tacos
 
Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: Orlando, FL
Posts: 320

Quote:
Originally Posted by disneydad78 View Post
But my turkey leg $$$$$$
I realize it is in jest, but I want to say it anyway for the general populous.

TWDC is made up of 5 divisions:

Media (ABC/ESPN etc)
WDPR (WDW/DCL etc)
Studios (Films)
Consumer Products (Merchandising)
Interactive Media (Video Games)

Last fiscal year, of the 3.5billion of investments, 2.7 went to WDPR. This is standard. In the previous year, of 2.1B, 1.5 went to WDPR. Year before... 1.7 and 1.2.

So typically WDPR gets significantly over 60% of the capital expenditure budget, while only bringing in 20-30% of the revenue.

Investments like this allow them to keep expanding WDPR while not charging EVEN MORE $$$$$. If they didn't do things like buy Cap City (ABC/ESPN), Pixar, Marvel, LucasFilms... WDPR would never be able to expand.
AndyPok1 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-02-2012, 09:09 AM   #7
OKW Lover

Yes, we love Old Key West
Connoisseur of the fine things in life, and has the time to enjoy them (Just ask his wife)
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: 2 miles north of the Castle!
Posts: 21,831

I think the OP is missing a very important part of the equation. Its not that Disney is going to spend more money now, they are getting a huge revenue stream as well.

Look at LucasFilms separately. Its not a money losing operation. Folding it into the Disney Corporation will not result in them losing money.
__________________
OKW Lover is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-02-2012, 09:15 AM   #8
chalee94
I thought all sand was ground up rocks
He's used to walking n00bies
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Winston-Salem, NC
Posts: 8,426

Quote:
Originally Posted by disneydad78 View Post
But my turkey leg $$$$$$
pretty sure the marvel and star wars franchises will pay for themselves but they do need your turkey leg money to pay for the fantasy land expansion...
__________________
-Charles

chalee94 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-02-2012, 09:20 AM   #9
Stacy's a freak
wrangles snakes
 
Stacy's a freak's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Finger Lakes, NY
Posts: 2,523

I can understand the question because my first thought is - how will this new investment affect the parks? But then I remember that the parks are just one part (and probably a smaller part) of the entire company. Disney is a company that has diversified to stay profitable. So this new investment may not affect the parks at all. Not only does this acquisition give them movie rights, it gives them the ridiculously profitable merchandising. You can't turn on the TV without seeing a Star Wars game, action figures, lego sets, etc. Now if Disney could acquire Lego, they would be unstoppable!

This conversation makes me wonder about the breakdown. Do we know what facet of their business makes the most money? I would be curious to know.
Stacy's a freak is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-02-2012, 09:37 AM   #10
OKW Lover

Yes, we love Old Key West
Connoisseur of the fine things in life, and has the time to enjoy them (Just ask his wife)
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: 2 miles north of the Castle!
Posts: 21,831

Quote:
Originally Posted by Stacy's a freak View Post
This conversation makes me wonder about the breakdown. Do we know what facet of their business makes the most money? I would be curious to know.
The Walt Disney Company is a publicly traded corporation and as such files regular financial statements with the SEC. Over the years the segment that makes the most money changes from year-to-year according to economic conditions, calendar events (timing of holidays), and movie blockbuster (or epic failure) results.

So, there really isn't one simple answer to this question.
__________________
OKW Lover is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-02-2012, 10:25 AM   #11
jcb
always emerging from hibernation
 
jcb's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: In view of the Smoky Mountains
Posts: 3,737

Quote:
Originally Posted by Stacy's a freak View Post
This conversation makes me wonder about the breakdown. Do we know what facet of their business makes the most money? I would be curious to know.
As Jeff said, this is complicated and varies from FY to FY. Disney hasn't yet released 2012 final numbers (they are to be released 11/8/12). Here are the segment revenues and "operating income" (essentially net revenue) for 2011 and 2010 (these amounts are in millions of dollars).



Media networks include ESPN, ABC and Disney Channels. (This helps explains why Disney featured High School Musical ad nauseum in the theme parks.)

The full report for 2011 is at http://thewaltdisneycompany.com/site...1-earnings.pdf

More reports are available at http://thewaltdisneycompany.com/inve...al-information

I think one of the factors behind acquisition of Lucasfilm has to be the volatility in Disney's studio segment (i.e., it still baffles me Disney could turn John Carter into a screenplay and marketing disaster).
__________________
Jack

Last edited by jcb; 11-02-2012 at 10:34 AM.
jcb is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-02-2012, 11:27 AM   #12
AndyPok1
Back in MCO!
To answer the other question, getting along is boring
I like tacos
 
Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: Orlando, FL
Posts: 320

Ya. That report is where I got my numbers from in the post above.

Like everyone says, it can vary from year to year, but typically you can bet on the following things:

1) ESPN will be a cash cow
2) WDPR will get a ton of investment.
3) Video Games will lose money.
AndyPok1 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-02-2012, 12:12 PM   #13
DisLUV
DIS Veteran
 
DisLUV's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: Louisiana
Posts: 786

Disneydad78, I just want to say hello from Ponchatoula, LA!!
__________________
Jeremy Harper
WL - VET
Disney in DEC-VET
DIS Dad's Club Member
DisLUV is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-02-2012, 01:04 PM   #14
skier_pete
DIS Veteran
 
skier_pete's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Buffalo, NY
Posts: 5,954

Star Wars is an evergreen property. One of the few out there, along with the Disney back catalog. I say this because the property gets re-sold to generation after generation and in format after format. Lucasfilm came out with the Blu-Ray box last year and made $84 million the first WEEK. The Phantom Menace, widely considered the crappiest of the movies, came out in 3-D and made $43 million domestic and $59 million more internationally. How much do you think one people actually LIKE will make. Last year star wars toys were a $250 million business.

And that doesn't even account for the new films, which will likely cost around $200 million to make. (No need to pay for "movie stars" so the budget can be kept reasonable, unlike Johnny Depp getting $50 million for Pirates 4.) Even with marketing costs at another $200 million, they are likely to minimally make $1 billion worldwide BO. A cool $600 million in profit, not to mention added home media revenue.

And then lets talk about the parks. Everybody's been saying "What's Disney's answer to Harry Potter?" Well, they answered in the most effective possible way. An expanded Star Wars land gives them true straight up competition with Harry Potter. And Star Wars has something that Harry Potter doesn't: continuous new content. If JK Rowling doesn't let someone add to the Harry Potter mythos, in 10 years it is very unlikely that Harry Potter will still be as popular as it is today, whereas Star Wars will likely have hooked yet another generation of fans. In addition to that, there's also the money they are now NO LONGER paying Lucasfilm for Star Tours / Jedi Academy / Star Wars Weekends / Indiana Jones which you can bet was in the 10s of millions year.

Star Wars is like Snow White and Cinderella, they're gonna keep on giving to the company bottom line. So, $4 billion sounds like a lot (and it isn't really $4 billion, as half of it is in newly minted stock, not the same as cash), but they will likely make that back 2 to 3-fold over the next 10 years.

It's funny that Eisner was able to take a struggling entertainment company and turn it into a major entertainment company, but Iger seems to have gone and turned Disney into THE entertainment company.
__________________

1971 - 1982 Many childhood trips May 1997 - Off-site w/ DGF (now DW) October 2000 - Off-site w/ DW - 1st AK
October 14-20,2006 - First on-site (POFQ), first w/ DD3 and DMIL. September 22-29, 2007 with freinds @ POFQ! August 23-31, 2008. Just us 3...dining for free!
December 12-20, 2009 - 40th Birthday trip! Trip Report April 20-25, 2010 - Short surprise trip for DD! Trip Report
October 15-25, 2010 @ AKL Trip Report!
November 11-20, 2011 - Free dining at CBR! PTR! and Trip Report
July/August 2012 Disneyland / Australia TripPTR "I choose to Be Amused" TR
The Disney Trifecta - a PTR for 2013. LINK Trip Reports - ABD: "A Fistful of Fastpasses" WDW: "For A Few Fastpasses More" DCL: "Once Upon a Time in the Carribean"

October 2014 Pre Trip Report- "Let us plan our Escape !" LINK NEW TR
skier_pete is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-02-2012, 01:45 PM   #15
KKDonaldFan
Earning My Ears
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Posts: 31

Just to throw another idea out there, I believe Lucas had been toying with the idea of a TV live-action series set between the events of Ep. 3 and Ep. 4.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Star_Wa...tion_TV_series

With Disney owning ABC, it could be a possibility that it could actually get developed.
KKDonaldFan is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply



Thread Tools
Display Modes Rate This Thread
Rate This Thread:

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

facebooktwitterpinterestgoogle plusyoutubeDIS Updates
GET OUR DIS UPDATES DELIVERED BY EMAIL



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 06:50 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2014, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.

Copyright © 1997-2014, Werner Technologies, LLC. All Rights Reserved.