|
|
#76 | |
|
Returning to "Earning My Ears" after all these years
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: Eastern Pennsylvania
Posts: 408
|
Quote:
__________________
... ... "Bianca"....."Bernard"...&..."Penny"- age 3 1/2 CBR- Sept 1997 CBR- Sept 17-24, 2001 CSR- May 13-20, 2008 ptr- http://disboards.com/showthread.php?t=2166836 Debating on a trip this year with 4 year old "Penny" and a 12 year old, too! |
|
|
|
|
| Sponsored Links | |
|
|
|
|
|
#77 | |
|
Mouseketeer
Join Date: May 2012
Posts: 388
|
Quote:
Again, not trying to say your opinion is wrong, but Disney needs to reach the newer generations, and use what appeals to them, or else the brand would become extinct. You as a parent have the final say in what your kids use or not, but IMHO I don't see the over sexualization of the princesses. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#78 | |
|
If it is "5 o'clock somewhere," does that mean it can be 5 o'clock anywhere and all the time?
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Dallas, Texas
Posts: 1,336
|
Quote:
1) new Mickey Mouse look vs old: Atleast the new version doesn't look like something out of a teen magazine; complete with a "come hither" look (imagine if MM looked like the Bieber) ![]() 2) The new Univ of Wisconsin football uniform look / Univ of Nebraska new football uniform look, etc. Yes, change is always just around the corner but alteast it isn's sexually suggestive like say the uniforms being tight around the rear end, etc. ![]() 3) The new princess look?? With all due respect, they now all look like ladys of the evening. ![]() (and to think, Walt even had Annette 'tone down' her upper chest area to therefore maintain that kid look & NOT what she was growing up into during filming of the MM show: A young lady. How I wish we had people like that in the ink & paint department. ![]() I mean, I understand clearly that change is always here BUT......... OMG - atleast Jessica Rabbit was meant to be that way - In short: IMHO, Disney has turned these princesses into objects. Not a smart move. ![]() T.T.F.N.
__________________
Por favor manténgase alejado de las puertas MY "GETTING SPOOKED @ WDW" - MNSSHP TRIP REPORT; Oct 28th -Nov 4th 2010(w/pics & video) http://www.disboards.com/showthread....0&referrerid=0 My "ADVENTURES N IRELAND" - TRIP REPORT; JUNE 2011 (w/pics & video) -http://www.disboards.com/showthread....8&referrerid=0 MY "ADVENTURES N HAWAII" -October 2011 trip report (w/pics & video)- http://www.disboards.com/showthread....2&referrerid=0 My "IT'S 5 O'CLOCK SOMEWHERE N KEY WEST, COZUMEL & G CAYMAN DCL TRIP REPORT; JAN'12 (w/pics & video)http://www.disboards.com/showthread....3&referrerid=0 MY "ADVENTURES N NEW YORK CITY" TRIP REPORT; SEPT '12 (w/pics & video)http://www.disboards.com/showthread....1&referrerid=0 MY "ADVENTURES N SAN FRAN, ROSE BOWL & COASTAL CALIFORNIA" PRE-TRIPPY REPORT - DEC '13 http://www.disboards.com/showthread....7&referrerid=0 MY "ADVENTURES N ENGLAND & SCOTLAND" PRE-TRIPPY REPORT - JUNE 2014 http://www.disboards.com/showthread....errerid=208040 MY "ADVENTURES N DISNEYLAND & OTHER ASSORTED STUFF" PRE-TRIPPY REPORT; DEC 2014 http://www.disboards.com/showthread....errerid=208040 Last edited by knewton64; 10-01-2012 at 05:24 AM. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#79 |
|
DIS Veteran
Join Date: May 2008
Posts: 726
|
Personally I don't think they're too bad. Probably because I read this thread first and was expecting a proper s&m stripper bunch of princesses. Although I do wonder what Cinderella has got around the neck and why, they look a lot less shocking than I expected.
Oh and they're way too thin, and that's coming from someone who's been very slim her whole life.
__________________
Sept/Oct 2005 - WDW - Animal Kingdom Lodge - 1 week - honeymoon
Jan/Feb 2007 - WDW - All Star Movies - 2 weeks - birthday trip Nov 2007 - DLP - Dream Castle Hotel - 4 days May 2008 - WDW - All Star Sports - 2 weeks Jan 2009 - WDW - All Star Music + All Star Movies - 2 weeks - birthday trip Feb/Mar 2010 - DLP - Santa Fe - 6 days Jan 2011 - WDW - All Star Movies & Pop Century - 17 days - birthday trip May 2011 - WDW - All Star Sports - 17 days - anniversary trip Nov 2011 - DLP - Hotel Cheyenne - 6 days OCT/NOV 2012-WDW-ALL STAR SPORTS+ART OF ANIMATION-3 WEEKS-10TH DISNEY TRIP! ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
|
|
|
|
|
#80 |
|
Mouseketeer
Join Date: Apr 2012
Posts: 188
|
I like the new designs, but agree that the makeup is a little exaggerated. Their new hair is very nice, and old hairstyles were outdated. Changing for the consumers is a wise decision.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#81 |
|
Mouseketeer
Join Date: Aug 2012
Location: Lake Erie
Posts: 192
|
A little tweak here and there is one thing. Adding several little tweaks all at once is what makes the difference. Belle was actually the one who jumped out at me most since she's been my favorite. Why did they need to lengthen her hair to 'adjust' her? She looks like a knock off.
While understanding things need to update now and then, I definitely stand in the 'dislike' corner. Shame. I was hoping to get a good Belle or Cinderella tshirt for myself on the next trip.
__________________
The Sunfinders ...
'Lady' (mom), 'Butch' (dad), me, Kit (21)'No Pit Stoppo!' -- Our first TR (Feb 2013) '88, '90, '94 to '98 -- offsite w/ family '09 -- ASsport & '13 -- AoA Cars '11 -- offsite at Disneyland! |
|
|
|
|
|
#82 |
|
Earning My Ears
Join Date: Sep 2012
Posts: 35
|
There is a certain elegance brought upon by the traditional princess design.
It's classic and common for there "era" so to speak to look as they did, note the similarities in snow aurora and cindy vs Ariel jasmine and belle... Then move further ahead and note the artistic designs of movies more recent. It's all based on marketing and appeal. I'm quite sure that there will be little change if any at all to the CMs. This is the appeal of these kids generation, cartoony and animated. It's almost like comparing the effect Pixar had on traditional cartoon art. Big bright eyes, bright colors, facial dimension and expression (I.e. snow white) in an attempt to bring the animated aspect of the princesses to appeal to the artistic demand of today's youth spoiled by technology and trends. I can confidently say I believe you will have your classic images still, and that these renderings are the target for the little ones. Unfortunate that there may not be as much of the traditional design for the kids who love and appreciate the classic |
|
|
|
|
|
#83 |
|
"I believe as many as six impossible things before breakfast."
Join Date: Jun 2011
Location: Durham, North Carolina
Posts: 194
|
From a guy with a little daughter here, I am not a fan. i do not like the overly sexualized new look of the princesses to begin with, but it strays much too far from the originals.
I will say, I have been a BIG fan of how the TV show "Once Upon a Time" has portrayed the princesses so far. Aside from Cinderella (which is understandable), all of the others have been very "normal" looking and relatable so far (Snow White, Belle, Aurora, Mulan).
__________________
2003 - Off Site - 2 nights 3 days 2006 - Grand Floridian 8 nights 9 days (Honeymoon) 2009 - Boardwalk - 3 nights 4 days 2011 - Grand Floridian - 7 nights 8 days (5 year Anniversary) |
|
|
|
|
|
#84 | |
|
DIS Veteran
Join Date: Feb 2007
Posts: 3,091
|
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#85 |
|
Have faith in your dreams and someday your rainbow will come smiling through...
Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: Essex, England
Posts: 1,535
|
I am so disappointed- I think they are almost unrecognizable if it weren't for the dresses. Cinderella's hair looks like something a teenager might wear to the prom and Belle's looks almost like a big, exaggerated wig.
I liked the old princesses. I liked how old they were and how they represented a different generation.
__________________
Dad
Mum Meg (16) William (14) Rory (7) Oscar (2) $5 A Day Means Disney MY Way! An October PTR ![]() Read Our Murray Family Blog! ![]() |
|
|
|
|
|
#86 |
|
Mouseketeer
Join Date: Nov 2008
Posts: 157
|
This could be why none of my friends little girls want me to bring them back ANY princess stuff from my next Disney trip. Kind of made me sad...they range in age from 3 - 10 and have NO interest anymore in princesses.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#87 |
|
I will fight, I will fly, taste the wind and touch the sky..
Join Date: Aug 2012
Location: In the forests on the Scottish Highlands.
Posts: 28
|
I like a lot of the designs... Though Jasmine's wayward curl bugs me, and I'm not really liking Cindy's choker. But I like them, for the most part. I guess I'm in the minority here. Ah well. I see nothing overtly sexual about it, though.
I can get not changing something from your childhood that you've fond memories of... Perhaps I'm not as bothered because I wasn't into the princesses as a kid. That said, I DO get where people from that angle are coming from; I wasn't pleased when SEGA changed the look of my favorite video game character. |
|
|
|
|
|
#88 |
|
Earning My Ears
Join Date: May 2010
Location: New Hampshire
Posts: 23
|
Personally, I think a lot of people are blowing this out of proportion.
I took a look at the pictures on the DisneyStore website, and a majority of the makeovers to the characters was addition of sparkles and patterns to their dresses. As a graphic designer, I see why this was done. It adds more interest and attracts the eye to the character as a whole, ultimately adding to revenue. As far as the facial and hair makeovers, most of the characters haven't changed. However, the worst change by far was Belle. Adding the amount of hair they did detracts from her dress, which, until Tiana arrived, was the most intricate of the princess dresses (not that I'm saying it's not anymore, its just not the only one). Yes they did alter Cinderella's facial structure and hair a little bit, but overall it did not detract from identifying her as Cinerella, which was very important. Actually I found her features a little sharp in various pieces of art and I think the new look softens some of those features. I'm glad they redid Ariel's bangs a bit, I always found her bangs overlarge on her small face. They look proportionate now. People on here have talked about the over-addition of make up which I don't seem to see. I see a little blush on their cheeks, but that hasn't changed from their past iterations. The other things people are blasting about are their sexualized positions, hips thrusting out and such and the only Character that seems to have the position is Jasmine, which is a position the she has stood in since the movies came out. I found her body unreallistically disproportionate since Aladdin was released (although that didn't stop me from being her for Halloween when I was 8). Overall, the important thing is that they have not changed the princesses enough to make them less identifiable. As long as they are still identifiable as a brand, they are still guarenteed to bring in merchandise revenue. Blast me if you like, but I'm just sharing some opinions and views from my view as a graphic designer (with a little bit of makreting thrown in there). |
|
|
|
|
|
#89 |
|
DIS Veteran
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: Colorado
Posts: 706
|
The new Ariel is scary...
Her head is twice the size of her waist! She looks like a Photoshop project-gone-wrong!!!
__________________
Disneyland 1979WDW Movies 1999DLR HoJo's 2005WDW Movies 2008DLR HoJo's 2009
(Me 50) (DS 17) (DS 11) |
|
|
|
|
|
#90 | |
|
Earning My Ears
Join Date: Sep 2012
Posts: 1
|
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | Rate This Thread |
|
|