Disney Information Station Logo

Go Back   The DIS Discussion Forums - DISboards.com > Disney Trip Planning Forums > Disney Rumors and News
Find Hotel Specials & DIScounts
 
facebooktwitterpinterestgoogle plusyoutubeDIS UpdatesDIS email updates
Register Chat FAQ Tickers Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read





Reply
 
Thread Tools Rate Thread Display Modes
Old 09-08-2012, 03:37 PM   #61
tjkraz

DVC Owner SSR
 
tjkraz's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: Ohio
Posts: 13,261

Quote:
Originally Posted by Peter Pirate 2 View Post
Lastly, the idea that HP didn't cause WDW to "lose anything" based on attendance numbers is just a non starter. If Universal's numbers didn't jump by 30 percent, chances are WDW's would have been much higher - probably not near 30 percent but possibly 10-12 percent (just throwing my own arbitrary figure out there). Income lost is income lost and believe me Disney knows this.
As of right now, I disagree.

It all depends on how the market as a whole has grown and/or shifted. If Wendy's sees an increase in their revenues, it doesn't necessarily mean that McDonald's has lost anything. Nor does it mean that McDonald's had any shot a taking those gains away from Wendy's.

In this case, if people were coming to Orlando specifically for WWoHP and have no history of visiting WDW, there is no reason to believe Disney could have gained that business instead of US. (Aside from Disney having contracted for HP in the first place, of course.)

The other likely scenario is that Disney has itself benefitted from the presence of WWoHP (and Legoland, and others.) If WWoHP is the draw, chances are some of that business spilled over into Disney's parks. In other words, family goes to central FL to see Harry Potter, but also decides to spend a day at the Magic Kingdom since they've already in town. Some will get multi-day passes and visit multiple Disney parks.

It's hard to draw any firm conclusions--even uneducated ones--because of the state of the economy over the last 4 years. Universal's numbers look great when expressed as a percentage but reality is IOA still draws 2 million fewer guests per year than either Animal Kingdom or Hollywood Studios. Universal Florida is 3.5 million under those two parks.

Disney's 1-2% increases don't look all that great but in the wake of record unemployment and underemployment, any gains at all may be laudable. And Disney's average guest spending has consistently risen.

That said, I do think Disney has reason to worry in the coming years. Guests taking a one-day pit stop at IOA for WWoHP may have a negligible impact. But, when more HP is added to the USF park combined with Transformers, Despicable Me and value-priced hotel rooms....suddenly Disney could be faced with losing guests entirely. Instead of staying on Disney property and popping-over to USF for a day, they could find more and more people staying at a Universal hotel and making day trips to Epcot and the Magic Kingdom. That hurts hotel occupancy, restaurant revenue, park admissions per guest, etc.
__________________
-- Tim

DVC owner at SSR, BWV and VGC
tjkraz is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-08-2012, 06:22 PM   #62
pilferk
Jambo Wildbunch Gang
I feel like Rita Rodney Dangerfield...
 
pilferk's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Connecticut
Posts: 6,556

Quote:
Originally Posted by Peter Pirate 2 View Post

Lastly, the idea that HP didn't cause WDW to "lose anything" based on attendance numbers is just a non starter. If Universal's numbers didn't jump by 30 percent, chances are WDW's would have been much higher - probably not near 30 percent but possibly 10-12 percent (just throwing my own arbitrary figure out there). Income lost is income lost and believe me Disney knows this.
If its a nonstarter...then prove/quantify what they lost. Nobody has done that with hard numbers or an explanation that passes the reality test. And THAT is what the Disney execs have shown they care about.

Wdw was not seeing 10% to 12%, annually, prior to WWOHP. More like 1% to 3%. Since WWOHP....1%...in line with prior years.

Since WWOHP, wdw resorts saw a 21% increase in profits. They have seen an 8% increase in per capita guest spending. And neither of those increases are from bottom feeder years.

Its not a nonstarter...its history.

You can speculate all you want, you can bet anything you want, but you have to try to account for the info we have, when doing it.

Down the road, we will see. But not yet. That value resort uni is building would be my concern, were I a Disney exec.
__________________
Disney dreamin'...Somewhere!
11 9 7 (...our little Disney Souvenir)
pilferk is offline   Reply With Quote
|
The DIS
Register to remove

Join Date: 1997
Location: Orlando, FL
Posts: 1,000,000
Old 09-08-2012, 06:32 PM   #63
Peter Pirate 2
I may be a Disney curmudgeon but I still have Disney hope
What happened to Peter Pirate?
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Posts: 2,839

Quote:
Originally Posted by pilferk View Post
If its a nonstarter...then prove/quantify what they lost. Nobody has done that with hard numbers or an explanation that passes the reality test.

Wdw was not seeing 10% to 12%, annually, prior to WWOHP. More like 1% to 3%. Since WWOHP....1%...in line with prior years.

Since WWOHP, wdw resorts saw a 21% increase in profits. They have seen an 8% increase in per capita guest spending. And neither of those increases are from bottom feeder years.

Its not a nonstarter...its history.

You can speculate all you want, you can bet anything you want, but you have to try to account for the info we have, when doing it.

Down the road, we will see. But not yet. That value resort uni is building would be my concern, were I a Disney exec.
Well, there is no sense in attempting intelligent discussion from either POV then because the information that would be necessary is not available to us, as you well know.

Tjkraz, I understand your point but McDonalds v Burger King or Coke v Pepsi are hardly the same as the theme park business in one particular city. I agree to disagree with you but it seems odd to me that you can't fathom that at least a percentage of the HP goers wouldn't have come to WDW had there been no Potter. They are theme park people for the most part I am sure. Do you disagree?
Peter Pirate 2 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-08-2012, 07:29 PM   #64
Fantasmiss
DIS Veteran
 
Fantasmiss's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2008
Posts: 1,021

Quote:
Originally Posted by tjkraz

As of right now, I disagree.

It all depends on how the market as a whole has grown and/or shifted. If Wendy's sees an increase in their revenues, it doesn't necessarily mean that McDonald's has lost anything. Nor does it mean that McDonald's had any shot a taking those gains away from Wendy's.

In this case, if people were coming to Orlando specifically for WWoHP and have no history of visiting WDW, there is no reason to believe Disney could have gained that business instead of US. (Aside from Disney having contracted for HP in the first place, of course.)

The other likely scenario is that Disney has itself benefitted from the presence of WWoHP (and Legoland, and others.) If WWoHP is the draw, chances are some of that business spilled over into Disney's parks. In other words, family goes to central FL to see Harry Potter, but also decides to spend a day at the Magic Kingdom since they've already in town. Some will get multi-day passes and visit multiple Disney parks.

It's hard to draw any firm conclusions--even uneducated ones--because of the state of the economy over the last 4 years. Universal's numbers look great when expressed as a percentage but reality is IOA still draws 2 million fewer guests per year than either Animal Kingdom or Hollywood Studios. Universal Florida is 3.5 million under those two parks.

Disney's 1-2% increases don't look all that great but in the wake of record unemployment and underemployment, any gains at all may be laudable. And Disney's average guest spending has consistently risen.

That said, I do think Disney has reason to worry in the coming years. Guests taking a one-day pit stop at IOA for WWoHP may have a negligible impact. But, when more HP is added to the USF park combined with Transformers, Despicable Me and value-priced hotel rooms....suddenly Disney could be faced with losing guests entirely. Instead of staying on Disney property and popping-over to USF for a day, they could find more and more people staying at a Universal hotel and making day trips to Epcot and the Magic Kingdom. That hurts hotel occupancy, restaurant revenue, park admissions per guest, etc.
Thank for for saying pretty much exactly what I wanted to say, I'm very tired and now I don't have to type so much! All well said :D
__________________
Sept/Oct 2005 - WDW - Animal Kingdom Lodge - 1 week - honeymoon
Jan/Feb 2007 - WDW - All Star Movies - 2 weeks - birthday trip
Nov 2007 - DLP - Dream Castle Hotel - 4 days
May 2008 - WDW - All Star Sports - 2 weeks
Jan 2009 - WDW - All Star Music + All Star Movies - 2 weeks - birthday trip
Feb/Mar 2010 - DLP - Santa Fe - 6 days
Jan 2011 - WDW - All Star Movies & Pop Century - 17 days - birthday trip
May 2011 - WDW - All Star Sports - 17 days - anniversary trip
Nov 2011 - DLP - Hotel Cheyenne - 6 days
Oct/Nov 2012 - WDW - All Star Sports+Art of Animation - 3 weeks - 10th Disney Trip
Oct/Nov 2013 - WDW - All Star Sports - 25 days - birthday trip
MAR 2014 - DLP - Hotel Cheyenne - 5 days- birthday trip

MAY 2014 - WDW - ALL STAR SPORTS - 17 DAYS - ANNIVERSARY TRIP!


Last edited by Fantasmiss; 09-09-2012 at 05:49 AM.
Fantasmiss is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-08-2012, 08:49 PM   #65
fuzzlekins
Mouseketeer
 
fuzzlekins's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2012
Posts: 493

I'm going to take a guess here that over half the multi-day tickets include the DP. Since DDP prices have risen around 18% (saw that elsewhere on this board), it makes sense that Disney profits are up. They seem to be pushing the envelope to see what they can get away with before people start foregoing the DP. Just an observation.
__________________
11/4-11/12/10
2/4-2/11/12
2/1-2/9/13
1/31-2/9/14
fuzzlekins is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-08-2012, 09:33 PM   #66
tjkraz

DVC Owner SSR
 
tjkraz's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: Ohio
Posts: 13,261

Quote:
Originally Posted by Peter Pirate 2 View Post
I agree to disagree with you but it seems odd to me that you can't fathom that at least a percentage of the HP goers wouldn't have come to WDW had there been no Potter.
Some, yes.

But the question is how many of those WDW "losses" are offset by "gains" from people who come primarily for WWoHP and then visit one or more of the Disney parks.

The simplest Disney-damaging scenario is the guest who claims "I always go to WDW for a week--this time we are only doing 5 days and then going to Universal for the other two." And I'm sure there are people who have done just that.

But there are also people who come specifically for Universal but also spend a couple days at Magic Kingdom and Epcot. In that manner, the existence of WWoHP has actually brought new business to Disney. Without WWoHP, neither Universal NOR Disney earns this customer's business.

I'm sure there are also many instances where a guest is staying at a Disney resort but makes a half-day side trip to IOA. They're staying at a Disney hotel...have multi-day Disney park passes...may even be on the DDP. They go to Universal in the morning/afternoon then return to their Disney hotel and even visit MK or Epcot in the evening. In that scenario, both IOA and Disney still get the attendance tick for the day. If Disney has "lost" anything, it's little more than the cost of a lunch eaten at IOA instead of in a Disney park.

And finally, there's the business Disney never had a shot at in the first place. Some percentage of those guests who came to town for WWoHP have no interest in Disney whatsoever. Whether Disney adds Avatarland, Cars Land, Fantasyland or any other Land...Disney simply isn't their thing. Disney wasn't going to get this group into their parks no matter what they did.
__________________
-- Tim

DVC owner at SSR, BWV and VGC
tjkraz is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-09-2012, 12:13 AM   #67
RobOnDisney
Mouseketeer
 
RobOnDisney's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: Houston, TX
Posts: 90

Realize my universe is small, but we see more Universal for guest staying at Disney World-- usually the 1-day option so they can hit WWOHP.

We rarely, meaning I can think of one time, ever see a Disney portion of the vacation to someone who comes in wanting US for WWOHP.

Again, our sample size is extremely small, but in real world terms I do not see WWOHP bringing Disney anything and I do see WWOHP siphoning of a day or two from visits on a regular basis. Mind you Disney still gets the resort stay, but it lost one to two meals and an opportunity to sell more merchandise.
__________________
Follow me on Twitter-- @RobOnDisney

Founder of Disney Family Man
RobOnDisney is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-09-2012, 08:23 AM   #68
pilferk
Jambo Wildbunch Gang
I feel like Rita Rodney Dangerfield...
 
pilferk's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Connecticut
Posts: 6,556

Quote:
Originally Posted by Peter Pirate 2 View Post
Well, there is no sense in attempting intelligent discussion from either POV then because the information that would be necessary is not available to us, as you well know.
Not all of it, no.

But we have some of it. So any speculation that it's costing Disney something quantifiable has to take it into account and explain around it.

Speculating they would have seen greater increases, had WWOHP not been built, while not looking at historical trends (which seem to indicate otherwise), doesn't do that.

Look, I'm not fixed to my position. But I've yet to see a case made, using any actual data, that sways me from it or gives me pause to consider it. I'd love to actually see one.
__________________
Disney dreamin'...Somewhere!
11 9 7 (...our little Disney Souvenir)

Last edited by pilferk; 09-09-2012 at 08:57 AM.
pilferk is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-09-2012, 08:46 AM   #69
pilferk
Jambo Wildbunch Gang
I feel like Rita Rodney Dangerfield...
 
pilferk's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Connecticut
Posts: 6,556

Quote:
Originally Posted by fuzzlekins View Post
I'm going to take a guess here that over half the multi-day tickets include the DP. Since DDP prices have risen around 18% (saw that elsewhere on this board), it makes sense that Disney profits are up. They seem to be pushing the envelope to see what they can get away with before people start foregoing the DP. Just an observation.
I'd guess a good portion of those multi-days with DDP also got it free, via a promotion. Now, the flip side to that is...they're paying rack rate for rooms and tickets (rather than, say, seeing a discount from UCT).

The DDP isn't the slam dunk value it used to be. How sure are we that it's still as widely in use as it was when it WAS a slam dunk value?

And your supposition doesn't take into account that attendance is still showing growth (not declines).

Still, not a bad point...though the 18% still only accounts for about $3 to $4 a night, per guest.
__________________
Disney dreamin'...Somewhere!
11 9 7 (...our little Disney Souvenir)
pilferk is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-09-2012, 08:48 AM   #70
pilferk
Jambo Wildbunch Gang
I feel like Rita Rodney Dangerfield...
 
pilferk's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Connecticut
Posts: 6,556

Quote:
Originally Posted by tjkraz View Post
Some, yes.

But the question is how many of those WDW "losses" are offset by "gains" from people who come primarily for WWoHP and then visit one or more of the Disney parks.

The simplest Disney-damaging scenario is the guest who claims "I always go to WDW for a week--this time we are only doing 5 days and then going to Universal for the other two." And I'm sure there are people who have done just that.

But there are also people who come specifically for Universal but also spend a couple days at Magic Kingdom and Epcot. In that manner, the existence of WWoHP has actually brought new business to Disney. Without WWoHP, neither Universal NOR Disney earns this customer's business.

I'm sure there are also many instances where a guest is staying at a Disney resort but makes a half-day side trip to IOA. They're staying at a Disney hotel...have multi-day Disney park passes...may even be on the DDP. They go to Universal in the morning/afternoon then return to their Disney hotel and even visit MK or Epcot in the evening. In that scenario, both IOA and Disney still get the attendance tick for the day. If Disney has "lost" anything, it's little more than the cost of a lunch eaten at IOA instead of in a Disney park.

And finally, there's the business Disney never had a shot at in the first place. Some percentage of those guests who came to town for WWoHP have no interest in Disney whatsoever. Whether Disney adds Avatarland, Cars Land, Fantasyland or any other Land...Disney simply isn't their thing. Disney wasn't going to get this group into their parks no matter what they did.
See, and that's exactly where I'm at. It jives with the numbers we DO have. And it shows why there's been no real quantifiable (I bold it because I think that's where people are losing the thread of the point) loss. It explains the attendance growth at WDW, and the fact guest spending is actually increasing (which means...no real merch sales loss, either).

And NONE of the above would give Disney much in the way to worry about.

Anecdotally...we have added one day to our stay to do WWOHP/IOA (with a night at the HRH)...2 years running. Instead of flyling in on a Thursday and going right to WDW, we fly in on Wednesday, go to the HRH, hit IOA on Thursday, and then check in at WDW on Thursday night. We would not have added that day for ANYTHING Disney added...because we have more than enough time on property to do anything new they might add (and would be OK skipping other stuff to do it...because we go every year). I have no delusions that we're typical...because my vacation time is a lot more flexible than at most companies in the US. But there you go.
__________________
Disney dreamin'...Somewhere!
11 9 7 (...our little Disney Souvenir)

Last edited by pilferk; 09-09-2012 at 09:03 AM.
pilferk is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-09-2012, 09:03 AM   #71
pilferk
Jambo Wildbunch Gang
I feel like Rita Rodney Dangerfield...
 
pilferk's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Connecticut
Posts: 6,556

And darn it...once again sucked back into a WWOHP discussion on an Avatarland thread. I feel I've made my point...I'm off the WWOHP discussions in threads on other topics. If anyone wants to start a WWOHP vs WDW thread (or if it's actually on topic to another thread), I'll bite again. But I think I'm pretty far afield of the original topic, here. Consider it self-moderation.
__________________
Disney dreamin'...Somewhere!
11 9 7 (...our little Disney Souvenir)
pilferk is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-09-2012, 10:00 AM   #72
EAWildman
Mouseketeer
 
EAWildman's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Atlanta, GA
Posts: 219

Two points....

You can establish that Harry Potter has taken a bite out of Disney's bottom line. Look at the past two years of Magical Express ridership data. It has decreased a bit each year. What has changed? Harry Potter. More folks are coming to Orlando and renting a car, even if they are staying at Disney, because they know they are going to need a car to get over to US for a day or two. If they are renting cars while staying on Disney property, they don't need Magical Express and ridership numbers go down. Which is what has happened for two consecutive years now.

Second point....

Everyone seems to be jumping on this one weak rumor of the whole Avatar project being shut down. Yet they ignore physical evidence. As reported, with photographic evidence, last week at mouseplanet.com, Beastly Bazaar is now officially closed as a retail location in preperation for being transformed into a character meet-and greet location. This is one of many steps necessary to shift attractions out of Cap Minnie-Mickey to make way for the upcoming Avatar Land at Disney's Animal Kingdom.

So, really, are you going to believe hearsay? Or actuall, real things that are happening in the park right now that point directly to Avatar Land becoming a reality?

Eric
__________________
----------------------------------------------
"They say that these are not the best of times,
but they're the only times I've ever known."
--Billy Joel
----------------------------------------------
Charter Member of D23
EAWildman is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-09-2012, 11:48 AM   #73
tjkraz

DVC Owner SSR
 
tjkraz's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: Ohio
Posts: 13,261

Quote:
Originally Posted by RobOnDisney View Post
Realize my universe is small, but we see more Universal for guest staying at Disney World-- usually the 1-day option so they can hit WWOHP.

We rarely, meaning I can think of one time, ever see a Disney portion of the vacation to someone who comes in wanting US for WWOHP.
Thanks for the info but there are two questions (which admittedly we cannot answer):

1. What was the proverbial tipping point for the trip? Even though the guests are staying at WDW and spending most of their time at WDW, do we know that all of them would still have taken the same trips if not for WWoHP?

2. Is Disney actually losing anything? As pilferk said, some of the US/IOA stops may be add-ons to the typical routine. If a guest's typical visit is 6 days at Disney, they could simply be expanding to 6 days Disney + 1 day IOA.

Quote:
Originally Posted by EAWildman View Post
You can establish that Harry Potter has taken a bite out of Disney's bottom line. Look at the past two years of Magical Express ridership data. It has decreased a bit each year. What has changed? Harry Potter. More folks are coming to Orlando and renting a car, even if they are staying at Disney, because they know they are going to need a car to get over to US for a day or two. If they are renting cars while staying on Disney property, they don't need Magical Express and ridership numbers go down. Which is what has happened for two consecutive years now.
Possible but there are certainly other factors at work. For instance, how have rental car rates changed over that period? I'll give you two very specific examples from my own recent history.

1) In December 2011 I had a 3 night stay booked at the BoardWalk. Planned to just use DME. However, a few weeks out I was checking rental car rates and ended up with a Standard size vehicle for $88. Sold. In Dec '10 I had stayed for almost the exact same dates and used DME because rental rates were twice that amount.

2) In February 2012 we had pretty complicated travel plans involving an arrival at MCO, return flight out of Tampa, week-long WDW stay and a short Disney cruise. Suffice it to say that the original plan was to take DME one-way from MCO to WDW and then pick up a rental car locally mid-stay. Turned out that rates dropped dramatically and it make more sense to just rent for the entire trip.

I perused the most recent DME report in the Sentinel for Jan - June 2012. While overall traffic was down 1%, it noted that traffic from Jan - Mar was actually up 2%, but then there was a steep decline in May which lead to the overall decline. Did thousands more people suddenly decide to rent in May 2012 so they could visit WWoHP or are there other forces at work?
__________________
-- Tim

DVC owner at SSR, BWV and VGC
tjkraz is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-09-2012, 10:08 PM   #74
CandyMandy
DIS Veteran
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Charlotte
Posts: 1,343

Quote:
Originally Posted by Peter Pirate 2 View Post
Avatar land was a good choice....generally speaking isn't the theme that counts most it is actually the application and implementation of the attractions that will be the key factor.
Maybe it's just me, but the above seems to basically translate into "style over substance." Don't worry about having a genre that has proven longevity and is of interest to broad audiences (neither of which Avatar has to yet to show). Just make sure you have lots of attractions with gimmicky virtual this-or-that or that "Avatar-land" features a big, big coaster.

Heck, that's what Six Flags does. And they sell a lot of tickets, don't they?
CandyMandy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-09-2012, 10:15 PM   #75
Peter Pirate 2
I may be a Disney curmudgeon but I still have Disney hope
What happened to Peter Pirate?
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Posts: 2,839

Quote:
Originally Posted by CandyMandy View Post
Maybe it's just me, but the above seems to basically translate into "style over substance." Don't worry about having a genre that has proven longevity and is of interest to broad audiences (neither of which Avatar has to yet to show). Just make sure you have lots of attractions with gimmicky virtual this-or-that or that "Avatar-land" features a big, big coaster.

Heck, that's what Six Flags does. And they sell a lot of tickets, don't they?
Wow. You couldn't be more off with what I said.

Quality trumps all is my point. It doesn't matter if the land is Bushwood CC as long as it is done to Disney quality because the guests ultimately don't care what the package looks like nearly as much as what is inside the package.
Peter Pirate 2 is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply



Thread Tools
Display Modes Rate This Thread
Rate This Thread:

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

facebooktwitterpinterestgoogle plusyoutubeDIS Updates
GET OUR DIS UPDATES DELIVERED BY EMAIL



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 01:43 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2014, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.

Copyright © 1997-2014, Werner Technologies, LLC. All Rights Reserved.

You Rated this Thread: