Disney Information Station Logo

Go Back   The DIS Discussion Forums - DISboards.com > Just for Fun > Photography Board
Find Hotel Specials & DIScounts
 
facebooktwitterpinterestgoogle plusyoutubeDIS UpdatesDIS email updates
Register Chat FAQ Tickers Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read





Reply
 
Thread Tools Rate Thread Display Modes
Old 08-04-2012, 08:45 PM   #1
KCmike
Never have fallen asleep on any attraction
Nothing wrong for dreaming for sure
 
KCmike's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Kansas City
Posts: 8,612

Another lens deal appeared - 70-300mm Refurbished

Canon EF 70-300mm f/4-5.6 IS USM Autofocus Telephoto Zoom Lens - Refurbished for $299

http://www.adorama.com/CA70300ISNR.h...ce=rflaid62905
__________________
Follow me on Flickr here:http://www.flickr.com/photos/90024104@N08/
"WDW Vet Who Found His New Home in Disneyland"
2014 Boston 2013 Disneyland Christmas
2013 WDW, Universal, and SeaWorld with the kids and their High School Marching Band Event
2012 Back to Disneyland for a late June/Early July Vacation|2011- WDW Grand Floridian/Port Orleans Riverside |2010 - Disneyland/Monterey 20th Anniversary Day trip and 1st time to see Christmas at any park (BWPPI)
2010 - Disneyland (Grand Californian) |2009 - Disneyland/San Francisco/Monterey/ Yosemite National Park (Disneyland Hotel) |2008 - Disneyland/San Diego (Hotel Del Coronado & Hojo) |2007 - Disneyland (Fairfield Inn) |2006 - WDW - Port Orleans Riverside |2004 - WDW - Port Orleans Riverside |1996 - WDW - Dixie Landings |1993 - WDW - Offsite |1992 - WDW - Condo in Kissimmee |1990 - WDW - Condo in Kissimmee


Gear:Canon 60d, Canon xti, and a few lenses
KCmike is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-07-2012, 08:40 AM   #2
reimero
DIS Veteran
 
reimero's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: Indiana
Posts: 576

I think Photochick has previously stated that this is the one lens she warns everyone to stay away from. The image quality on the 55-250 is far superior.
__________________
reimero is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-07-2012, 09:13 AM   #3
photo_chick
Knows a little about a lot of things, a lot about nothing.
 
photo_chick's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: in the middle of Dallas/Fort Worth
Posts: 4,843

Quote:
Originally Posted by reimero View Post
I think Photochick has previously stated that this is the one lens she warns everyone to stay away from. The image quality on the 55-250 is far superior.
Its the 75-300 from Canon (the under $200 one) you want to run far, far away from. The 70-300 is a bit better optically and has IS but is still pretty slow.
__________________
Danielle

photo_chick is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply



Thread Tools
Display Modes Rate This Thread
Rate This Thread:

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

facebooktwitterpinterestgoogle plusyoutubeDIS Updates
GET OUR DIS UPDATES DELIVERED BY EMAIL



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 05:23 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2014, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.

Copyright © 1997-2014, Werner Technologies, LLC. All Rights Reserved.