The DIS Discussion Forums - DISboards.com

The DIS Discussion Forums - DISboards.com (http://www.disboards.com/index.php)
-   Disney Rumors and News (http://www.disboards.com/forumdisplay.php?f=36)
-   -   Lone Ranger = John Carter (http://www.disboards.com/showthread.php?t=3136893)

TheRustyScupper 07-06-2013 12:15 PM

Lone Ranger = John Carter
 
1) Disney lands another "bomb" of a movie.
2) Everyone KNOWS the Lone Ranger story.
3) Why did Disney think they could re-write it?
4) Even with Johnny Dep?
5) Critics think the movie will lose $100+ million.
6) Just because it's Disney, doesn't mean
. . . "if they make it the public will come"
7) Still needs to be a good flick.


NOTE: Even U.S.A. losers can make up the loss in worldwide
release. But, the worldwide market doesn't jump on Westerns
like they do for science fiction.

Yellowstonetim 07-07-2013 08:21 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by TheRustyScupper (Post 48875916)
1) Disney lands another "bomb" of a movie.
2) Everyone KNOWS the Lone Ranger story.
3) Why did Disney think they could re-write it?
4) Even with Johnny Dep?
5) Critics think the movie will lose $100+ million.
6) Just because it's Disney, doesn't mean
. . . "if they make it the public will come"
7) Still needs to be a good flick.


NOTE: Even U.S.A. losers can make up the loss in worldwide
release. But, the worldwide market doesn't jump on Westerns
like they do for science fiction.

No it isn't going to be that bad. Lone Ranger has earned $30 Million before we even got to the weekend. It will earn 50 or 60 Million. It is getting very good ratings from viewers so will have good word of mouth. It will not be a big hit, westerns rarely are, but it will not be a John Carter, either.

Don't panic yet, lets wait and see how the first weekend does. It is only in comparison with DM2 that it appears so bad.

OKW Lover 07-07-2013 08:37 AM

I don't think it will be as bad as John Carter but it certainly isn't good. Rotten Tomatoes had it at only 24% liking it. I'd say thats a little low.

I didn't care for it myself. I thought it was a mess of 3-stooges and violence, without enough "William Tell Overture".

323sarg 07-07-2013 10:03 AM

Went and seen it this weekend. Think Disney tried to make the Lone Ranger too wholesome and the movie seemed to drag. Could have been awesome if they would have added a little more mortality to him. Not advocating violence but you can't have an action movie and plot as such and you main characters refuse to use guns to shoot people. While the rest of the world has them and shooting at you.

At one point it was almost like " come on" with the wholesome type approach

Brer Chump 07-08-2013 08:17 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Yellowstonetim (Post 48882305)

No it isn't going to be that bad. Lone Ranger has earned $30 Million before we even got to the weekend. It will earn 50 or 60 Million. It is getting very good ratings from viewers so will have good word of mouth. It will not be a big hit, westerns rarely are, but it will not be a John Carter, either.

Don't panic yet, lets wait and see how the first weekend does. It is only in comparison with DM2 that it appears so bad.

Actually it looks worse when you compare gross to budget + marketing. LR has brought in just shy of $50 million after the long weekend compared its $215 million production budget, which reports say it went over. Then there is marketing costs it needs to recoup. Hollywood Insider is predicting a $150 million loss. $50 million less than John Carter.

The John Carter analogy is a fair comparison.

http://www.hollywoodreporter.com/new...ld-lead-581503

pilferk 07-08-2013 09:55 AM

Saw it (because we had free tickets).

Reminded me a lot (and not in a good way) of Wild, Wild, West.

TJSkinner 07-08-2013 10:10 AM

Lone Ranger
 
I thought it was a little corny. Everyone knows the Lone Ranger from TV and Movies. But a non violent Lone Ranger who refuses to even wear a gun. In the old west, especially someone raised there would know the necessity for wearing a gun. Plus since when does Texas have spirals and decorative mesas and buttes outside of Palo Duro Canyon. Disney should know that if you say it's Texas, do not film in Monument Valley.

lockedoutlogic 07-08-2013 11:32 AM

this movie was plagued by replacements and rewrites in production...it was rumored that johnny depp was kinda pushing it through into production.

Maybe disney will learn...when this happens, the film is DOA. It's not going to have major story/production problems and gross 500 million. not gonna happen.

it does parallel john carter in that respect.

Concentrate on making a good star wars, you fools...that is 75% of your future profit if done right.

Spacedog1975 07-08-2013 12:10 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by lockedoutlogic (Post 48894016)
Concentrate on making a good star wars, you fools...that is 75% of your future profit if done right.

A wee bit of an overstatement.

They do need to make sure Star Wars is done well. There has already been one trilogy that wasn't received well by fans. Having new directors and writers on the property will help tremendously.

Disney definitely needs to develop additional properties though.

lockedoutlogic 07-08-2013 12:28 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Spacedog1975 (Post 48894457)
A wee bit of an overstatement.

They do need to make sure Star Wars is done well. There has already been one trilogy that wasn't received well by fans. Having new directors and writers on the property will help tremendously.

Disney definitely needs to develop additional properties though.

actually no...


they have their marvel properties and they have pixar to fill the coffers...now they bought star wars to do the same.

I know that they have to make more movies than that...no question...but their attempts to come up with the "next great franchise" have been not successful....carter, prince of persia, etc. pirates is somewhat of a surprise cash cow that went off the rails a little and narnia has done fairly well...

but star wars is where the money can be. it was number one in 11 of 12 on licensing rights over the last 12 years....and the one time it wasn't it was #2 to another disney property.
That was WITH the terrible movies in play.

that thing is an international cash cow...and disney's approach should be doing everything possible to make it a complete succes (like...oscar consideration...if possible). a "good enough" action flick would be a huge mistake. that works for the marvel properties...but would be a tremendous miscalculation here.

skier_pete 07-08-2013 12:55 PM

I haven't seen it yet, but was looking forward to it. Johnny Depp and Gore Verbinski already made a great western together - in RANGO. Clearly they wanted to do live action. I still might go see it, but the reviews seem to range from "pretty good" to "meh" - not too many saying TERRIBLE. However, I wonder if it suffered from John Carter's "need to please everyone" ends up "pleasing no-one".

Ah well, not every movie can be great.

DizCaptain 07-08-2013 01:33 PM

I liked John Carter... It was a decent film with an old-school feel. Marketing was its downfall in my opinion. I haven't seen Lone Ranger yet but a lot of what I hear points at a bad plot mixed with a 2.5 hour runtime. I'll still give it a shot though.

HM 07-08-2013 01:47 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DizCaptain (Post 48895390)
I liked John Carter... It was a decent film with an old-school feel. Marketing was its downfall in my opinion. I haven't seen Lone Ranger yet but a lot of what I hear points at a bad plot mixed with a 2.5 hour runtime. I'll still give it a shot though.

I totally agree. I didn't see John Carter in the theaters. The trailers did not interest me. When it came out in Redbox, we rented it. (Twice now.) The story was so different from what we had been lead to believe by the adverts. Everyone in our family (older teens and adults) liked it. Not a great movie, but an interesting one.

And it made me want to read the book, which was pretty terrible....that John Carter was one guy who really had a major ego. I was glad it was short and that ego didn't come through in the movie storyline.

We've decided that Lone Ranger is also going to be a Redbox rental.

Tinkerboy00 07-08-2013 02:35 PM

I haven't seen either but both look boring to me.

Im a little upset by the choice of Johnny Depp as Tonto. My problem with him is every role he plays seems like the same character/person to me: Willa Wonka, Mad Hatter, Jack Sparrow etc. I mean, Im not gonna lie, he does them all very well, and I love them all and I love him.

But just not interested in this movie at all. Mabye on demand

TJSkinner 07-08-2013 02:50 PM

Lone Ranger
 
Do not get me wrong. This movie had some very dramatic moments, great action scenes, but a horse even a spirit horse that can jump up into a tree and onto buildings, just a little hard to believe. Plus there is missing that chemistry between Tonto and the Lone Ranger. hard to believe they are buddies. Armie Hammer hammed it up a bit much. The scene where Tonto argues with the horse, great scene. Just wish there had been more great scenes. Still I will watch it again when it comes out on Blu-ray.


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 10:25 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2014, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.

Copyright 1997-2014, Werner Technologies, LLC. All Rights Reserved.