The DIS Discussion Forums - DISboards.com

The DIS Discussion Forums - DISboards.com (http://www.disboards.com/index.php)
-   Disney Restaurants (http://www.disboards.com/forumdisplay.php?f=14)
-   -   Party of 16 at Beaches & Cream? (http://www.disboards.com/showthread.php?t=3026015)

Herbie 11-26-2012 03:07 PM

Party of 16 at Beaches & Cream?
 
Tried to take the Fam for the Kitchen Sink yesterday at 3pm, and were told we had a min of an hour and a half, because they were seating a party of 16!! Am i off base in thinking that seating a part that large is just wrong? no one else could get in because they took up half of the place.

Guess i am just irritated and disappointed........

nansmama 11-26-2012 03:14 PM

Wow! Yeah, that is pretty crazy for the size of that place.

MickeyNicki 11-26-2012 03:55 PM

Whats the difference if there is one party of 16 or four parties of 4??

Seriously, think about it for a sec..there is absolutely no difference, a wait time is a wait time

Herbie 11-26-2012 03:58 PM

OK, There actually was a difference. To accomodate them, a LOT of tables sat empty waiting until all of the party could be seated, while smaller parties could have come and gone. It backed everything up.

minnie mum 11-26-2012 04:27 PM

AFAIK, Beaches and Cream only takes walk ups. Whether it's one person or 16, it's first come first served and you wait your turn. Sucks if you're the one at the end of the line, but such is life.

chocovrdmicears 11-26-2012 05:52 PM

What other option did they have?:confused3 Are they suppose to tell the party of 16 "Sorry - you have too many in your party..you can't eat here?" They were there before you and they have just as much right to be seated as your party does.

Pumbaa_ 11-26-2012 06:05 PM

How disappointing! One of the downsides to B&C being such a tiny place

davedmaine 11-26-2012 06:52 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Herbie (Post 46792089)
Tried to take the Fam for the Kitchen Sink yesterday at 3pm, and were told we had a min of an hour and a half, because they were seating a party of 16!! Am i off base in thinking that seating a part that large is just wrong? no one else could get in because they took up half of the place.

Guess i am just irritated and disappointed........

Yes, you're off-base. A party of 16 has just as much right to be there as your entitled family. Get there before them next time.

dvcterry 11-26-2012 09:42 PM

It does kind of stink. But at the same time it is first come first served. Even if they were a larger party. We have a large party when we go out sometimes. Sometimes we sit all together and other times we are told we may not be seated all together. Just like Disney reservations. B & C is a walk up so no advance notice. And the group had as much right to dine as any one of us.

Allison 11-26-2012 11:07 PM

That party has just as much right to eat there as your party does. I am not sure why you would think otherwise.

cymbaldiva 11-27-2012 12:00 AM

I thought this was a place we could all vent - for all of you that are saying the OP is wrong, think about it - if you were really in his/her shoes, wouldn't you be at least be a little bummed?

And the super helpful answer of "get there first"? Yeesh,,,

Sorry OP - while a big party has every right to be there, I still feel your pain - tough break :(

TheRustyScupper 11-27-2012 03:45 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Herbie (Post 46792089)
. . . Am i off base in thinking that seating a part that large is just wrong? no one else could get in because they took up half of the place . . .

. . . no, not off base.

Quote:

Originally Posted by MickeyNicki (Post 46792489)
Whats the difference if there is one party of 16 or four parties of 4??

. . . big difference
. . . lots of lost revenue with such a large party
. . . too little table turnover
. . . too many seats lost when tables are pushed together

fla4fun 11-27-2012 06:22 AM

I'm not sure they could even push tables together at B&C because the tables are all round (except the booths and counter, which can't be pushed anyway).

There have been times when I've stopped by B&C and been told the wait would be an hour, and I just went elsewhere. It doesn't really matter why the wait is so long - it is what it is and you either wait or you go elsewhere. My limit for waiting there is about 30 minutes. Since I'm usually solo or two people, I usually ask for the counter to try to be seated faster. The counter wouldn't be too conducive to sharing a KS, although I've seen people do it before.

I'm sorry the OP was disappointed. Although they had the option to wait (and the wait could have been shorter or longer than stated - you never know), they decided to take their business elsewhere, which I totally understand. Personally, I think they should move the arcade and expand B&C since it's so popular.

Allison 11-27-2012 06:23 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by cymbaldiva (Post 46795882)
I thought this was a place we could all vent - for all of you that are saying the OP is wrong, think about it - if you were really in his/her shoes, wouldn't you be at least be a little bummed?

And the super helpful answer of "get there first"? Yeesh,,,

Sorry OP - while a big party has every right to be there, I still feel your pain - tough break :(

Venting about the wait is one thing. Stating that the other party was somehow doing something wrong is another.

magicaldisney 11-27-2012 06:27 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Allison (Post 46796414)
Venting about the wait is one thing. Stating that the other party was somehow doing something wrong is another.


Exactly!! :thumbsup2


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 01:48 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2014, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.

Copyright 1997-2014, Werner Technologies, LLC. All Rights Reserved.