Sorry to say to all those defending but in this day that's a ridiculous response. Next thing I feel I will hear is thats a single woman doesn't have the means to buy on their own. What year is it?
Sorry, but they throw out gift cards at the drop of a hat. I'd call back OP. This time you'll be prepared if you get that same line. I guarantee though that they would not have gotten a dime of my money direct if I had heard that. Even in CA a married woman can own real estate in her name only.
I'm guess though that you are looking at VGC for your purchase since you are a DL AP holder? That will almost certainly mean resale and you may possibly hear some mis-truths about resale if brought up during a tour. Other than seeing a model I did not find much if any additional information from a DVC tour. In fact, after my first one (which I was doing a small add on) I was tutoring the pretty new guide who was doing the paperwork. That was at DL.
There may also be some legal issues in some states about one spouse owning and/or taking on debt for something like that, in which it also legally obligates the spouse, or gets split with the spouse in a divorce, even though their name isn't on the deed. Like possibly CA for instance, where all the assets of both people I believe are considered common property. So even though it may have sounded sexist and the person should have phrased it better to sound more mandatory for Disney to do it that way, there may be legal reasons why they have to do it that way. I'm not a lawyer though, maybe someone can chime in who knows more about real estate law.
There may also be some legal issues in some states about one spouse owning and/or taking on debt for something like that, in which it also legally obligates the spouse, or gets split with the spouse in a divorce, even though their name isn't on the deed. Like possibly CA for instance, where all the assets of both people I believe are considered common property. So even though it may have sounded sexist and the person should have phrased it better to sound more mandatory for Disney to do it that way, there may be legal reasons why they have to do it that way. I'm not a lawyer though, maybe someone can chime in who knows more about real estate law.
Only in very specific circumstances. Only if the asset was owned prior to marriage and never commingled with marital assets, or squired through an inheritance.Even community property states can have ownership by only one spouse.
They will allow one to tour, just not get the gifts. While I've seen exceptions to this policy with timeshares in general, all of the policies I've ever heard of require a minimum income and both parties to tour if married. It's totally appropriate on their part and would be financially irresponsible of them to do otherwise. I've done many timeshare tours without my spouse but for free and often having to wait not the staff to finish up with other tours.
They know your income without asking though normally when you agree to the tour, they'll go over a list of qualifications that will include a minimum income, I'm not sure if DVC does. With many you actually sign that you do qualify and it will include a minimum income on the list. I've seen anywhere from $45K to $75K though I suspect some are higher like Ritz or Four Seasons and they'll change over time.Yeah, I was never asked about a "minimum income", though I assume it's obvious to them by my on-site spending at Disney (now two full weeks at DL hotels, another two weeks at WDW resorts when I have a home address there, and APs on both coasts for just me and that's just since January).
That said - how would this be any different if I had just said I was a single woman? Because I would be purchasing DVC as a single woman, for all intents and purposes.
either way -- not sure why it would be disney's problem. They have no need to figure it out. The only thing they need to know is what name(s) should be on the title. If the couple gets into a fight over ownership at a later date -- the courts will be the ones to figure it out.Only in very specific circumstances. Only if the asset was owned prior to marriage and never commingled with marital assets, or squired through an inheritance.
That may happen and it does sometimes with timeshare tours but it is not applicable to the OP.During our tour, the dvc guide spoke only to my then fiancée. He completely ignored me. The guy was an idiot. I was buying...
Fiancee (now husband) was a med student finishing his phd with a 20k stipend and tons of student loans. That was 5yrs ago. He's still finishing up Residency.
So these sexist jerks only talk to the male half of the equation not realizing I'm the current breadwinner and decision maker. Happened when we were purchasing our first home too.
I walked out of the dvc tour pissed and bought resale 6mo later.
So yah, there is sexism.
I'm also very feminist and sensitive to sexism as a 7 sisters alum....
It's not sexist at all. When I wanted to book a tour, they told me my wife needed to be present. It makes sense. Regardless of who the breadwinner is, shouldn't both persons in a relationship be involved in a decision like this?Is this something normal or am I just being overly sensitive by feeling that this is all pretty sexist? This was my first extended encounter with anything having to do with potentially becoming a DVC owner and it's left a pretty poor taste in my mouth.
It's not sexist at all. When I wanted to book a tour, they told me my wife needed to be present. It makes sense. Regardless of who the breadwinner is, shouldn't both persons in a relationship be involved in a decision like this?
Sorry, didn't read this whole thread, in case this was addressed.