Of course she was angry. There's a petition Firestone have her disbarred and the officers are suing her.
I looked for, but could not find, her comments about notes being given to the defense. That presumably would have been during discovery -- the court process which allows the defense to learn what evidence the prosecution has. What did Mosby say about the notes?
It's the same thing as a baseball player throwing his bat after striking out again in a big game. She went 0-4, with some really ugly swings.
Thanks. Interesting political theater.
This one is pretty hard to believe. A search warrant is a legal order by a judge directing the police to search a specific place for specific evidence. I can't imagine any law enforcement agency refusing to serve a search warrant! And if they did, what did she do about it...whine? She should have locked someone up if this claim is true. If it really happened and she didn't lock somebody up, she was shirking her duty as a prosecutor.
Well, there are several big issues with these claims:
Of course she does. But the lead detective didn't file the six cases, did she?
Do you have any links to that info. I don't see how notes as described would ever be admitted into evidence in a trial. Or why a prosecutor would bring up his/her dissatisfaction with the lead investigator. What does that have to do with anything? That's completely irrelevant.
Thanks. I can understand bits and pieces of both sides' viewpoints from that article, especially regarding the detective's case notes. Some of the other behavior reported -- if true -- is just plain bizarre...by both the detective and the prosecutors. Messed up case, for sure.
