If you only had one lens

kidneymomma

Mouseketeer
Joined
Jun 15, 2015
I have a Canon T1i, I know it's an older camera but I only take photos of my kids so no reason to upgrade. I own the 18-55mm Kit lens, & purchased 18-200 mm for some zoom, and the nifty fifty to learn to shoot in manual mode and learn more about aperature. On our Disneyland trip I used 18-200mm but man did it kill my neck. I plan on getting a padded neck strap before disney world. I'm considering purchasing a new (more than likely used lens). What would be the best all around lens for disney? One that will last from morning until the fireworks? The darker rides & character meet and greets?
 
Check out the cross body style straps like those from Black Rapid. That can make a huge difference.

With a crop sensor Canon camera, my choice would be a Canon 17-55 f/2.8 IS lens. It would be a nice step up in IQ from what you have now and it does great in low light.
 
Check out the cross body style straps like those from Black Rapid. That can make a huge difference.

With a crop sensor Canon camera, my choice would be a Canon 17-55 f/2.8 IS lens. It would be a nice step up in IQ from what you have now and it does great in low light.

I will have to check out a cross body strap! Thanks fir the lens suggestion too. :)
 
Love my black rapid!

I have a Tamron 28-75 f/2.8 that I is my everyday walk around zoom. Great versatile lens. It's that or my Sigma 30mm f/1.4 for indoors or low lighting. I plan on packing both for wdw :)
 
Love my black rapid!

I have a Tamron 28-75 f/2.8 that I is my everyday walk around zoom. Great versatile lens. It's that or my Sigma 30mm f/1.4 for indoors or low lighting. I plan on packing both for wdw :)



What is your black rapid?
 
I'll second and third the BlackRapid straps - I have an older RS-4 and a newer Yeti, and with the Yeti I can carry two gripped camera bodies with flashes and a heavy f/2.8 zoom on one and a fast prime on the other for 6-8 hours before I get tired - and I have RRS plates on my gear, too!

This is the current women's strap from them: http://www.blackrapid.com/products/kick

Op-Tech is another great strap maker, with all sorts of solutions, but are a bit more pro and more system-oriented. Made in the USA, too. Regardless though, don't carry it around your neck. Besides looking like a tourist, it'll kill your neck after a bit; when I use the manufacturer's strap, I use it over one shoulder.

For a lens, the 17-55 is pretty big and heavy (22.8 oz - about the same as most 18-200 mm) and although it's better image quality than the 18-55, IMHO it's not enough for the weight, especially at WDW. What you're paying for is the f/2.8 maximum aperture, so you can shoot in lower light, but given the age of the T1i you'd get the same low light performance by upgrading your body to the SL1 or similar. For my money, I'd get the 17-85 mm. It's 16.8 oz, so not nearly as heavy, it's less expensive, and the zoom range is more usable, and it's also very sharp. I use the Nikon version (a 16-85) as my walk-around lens, really enjoy it, and the Canon is just as good as the Nikkor.

But to be honest, you already own the lens I'd recommend for walk-around at WDW: the 18-55. Just because it's the cheap kit lens, don't knock it too much, it's quite sharp, and with your older body its few optical flaws are pretty much invisible. For a second, a fast 35/40/50 mm lens to cover your indoors/low light needs ... which you also already own. 35 is more useful than 50 on a crop sensor, but they both do the job. :)
 
I'll second and third the BlackRapid straps - I have an older RS-4 and a newer Yeti, and with the Yeti I can carry two gripped camera bodies with flashes and a heavy f/2.8 zoom on one and a fast prime on the other for 6-8 hours before I get tired - and I have RRS plates on my gear, too!

This is the current women's strap from them: http://www.blackrapid.com/products/kick

Op-Tech is another great strap maker, with all sorts of solutions, but are a bit more pro and more system-oriented. Made in the USA, too. Regardless though, don't carry it around your neck. Besides looking like a tourist, it'll kill your neck after a bit; when I use the manufacturer's strap, I use it over one shoulder.

For a lens, the 17-55 is pretty big and heavy (22.8 oz - about the same as most 18-200 mm) and although it's better image quality than the 18-55, IMHO it's not enough for the weight, especially at WDW. What you're paying for is the f/2.8 maximum aperture, so you can shoot in lower light, but given the age of the T1i you'd get the same low light performance by upgrading your body to the SL1 or similar. For my money, I'd get the 17-85 mm. It's 16.8 oz, so not nearly as heavy, it's less expensive, and the zoom range is more usable, and it's also very sharp. I use the Nikon version (a 16-85) as my walk-around lens, really enjoy it, and the Canon is just as good as the Nikkor.

But to be honest, you already own the lens I'd recommend for walk-around at WDW: the 18-55. Just because it's the cheap kit lens, don't knock it too much, it's quite sharp, and with your older body its few optical flaws are pretty much invisible. For a second, a fast 35/40/50 mm lens to cover your indoors/low light needs ... which you also already own. 35 is more useful than 50 on a crop sensor, but they both do the job. :)


I looked up the camera you suggested and I can get it body only at b&h for $399. If I could sell my camera for a hundred bucks I'd be willing to upgrade. My T1i with high ISO gets very noisy photos even when I use Lightroom to try to reduce the noise it's still very noticeable. I've learned more and continue to learn more about my camera since first buying it.
 
I typically buy my own Christmas gift then have DH wrap it up; I guess I know what he's getting me this year! A cross body strap for the camera
 
I have the same strap as Meeko5, love it.

As far as a lens, my favorite is my 18-135 STM. Love the range, pictures are sharp. But not the best for low light. I have the Tamron 17-50VC that I use if low light is an issue.
 
To each his own. That Canon 17-55 lens is generally acknowledged as being on par with L quality glass. I carried it and used it for years before upgrading to full frame and the reach worked for 95% of what I needed at WDW.
 
I looked up the camera you suggested and I can get it body only at b&h for $399. If I could sell my camera for a hundred bucks I'd be willing to upgrade. My T1i with high ISO gets very noisy photos even when I use Lightroom to try to reduce the noise it's still very noticeable. I've learned more and continue to learn more about my camera since first buying it.
I was using the SL1 as an example because it's small, but anything is going to be better at high ISO than a T1i; Any of the newer Rebels have similar boosts in high ISO performance of about 1 stop.
 
I will have to watch the fliers on Black Friday. That's when I purchased my T1i as a Black Friday deal years ago. So even like the t5i would be better than mine? As its newer? I would get less noise at higher ISO
 
Yes, pretty much anything newer will have lower noise at high ISO. T5i, T6i, SL1, you name it. :)


DH has some shopping to do this Christmas.

I will even check to see if I can get a deal on an used one.

If I try to sell my T1i what would it be worth? Body only I'd keep my lenses. $150 at most?
 
$150 sounds about right for private party sale. keh.com may give you about that for it, as well, and without the hassle. Used is a good way to get a good deal, and also refurbished - new ones tend to sell for whatever the lowest Canon lets them sell for.

You may also want to look for a body and lens kit, which includes a lens with more zoom (but still less than the 18-200) for better walk-around ability.
 
My mother in law has always wanted a DSLR it maybe just as easy to give it to her. I still have the box and manuals.....would that be horrible to gift her my old camera? We probably spend at least $150 on gifts for my husbands parents at Christmas.
 
Depends ... if it's in good working order, and there's something new to go along with it, it wouldn't be bad. It also wouldn't be bad to keep it for yourself as a second body or backup body - I frequently have a telephoto lens on one body and a mid to wide angle on the other, so that rather than changing lenses I can just switch cameras quickly.
 
These are all pictures taken recently. I use it frequently; I have a p&s but never use it. True about keeping it but like at Disney I don't think I would want to carry two cameras.
 

Attachments

  • image.jpg
    image.jpg
    80 KB · Views: 6
  • image.jpg
    image.jpg
    132.6 KB · Views: 6
  • image.jpg
    image.jpg
    95.6 KB · Views: 6
  • image.jpg
    image.jpg
    45.5 KB · Views: 5
  • image.jpg
    image.jpg
    46.8 KB · Views: 5
I'd never carry two cameras at WDW (unless one was a pocket-sized P&S or something), but for soccer games and the ilk it's very useful - having a 55-250 on one body and an 18-55 on the other solves many problems when action moves across the field.

For WDW, my second body comes along in case something happens to my primary, so I have a backup and am not without a DSLR for the rest of the trip. If all goes according to plan, it stays in the hotel room. :)

Here's a comparison tool that can show you what sort of difference you can expect to see:

http://www.dpreview.com/reviews/stu...076&x=-0.842488693298038&y=1.2812053558668483
 

GET A DISNEY VACATION QUOTE

Dreams Unlimited Travel is committed to providing you with the very best vacation planning experience possible. Our Vacation Planners are experts and will share their honest advice to help you have a magical vacation.

Let us help you with your next Disney Vacation!











facebook twitter
Top