Sony RX100 III

WebmasterPete

Grand Administrator
Joined
Jun 1, 1997
So, I've had this camera for a little while, but having the attention span of a toddler, I found the user interface a little frustrating, so I didn't play with it too much. The DIS team was out in Disneyland to gather content for an event we're doing on the site starting May 22nd, and I decided to really put this camera through its paces. I really didn't think I'd ever use a compact camera that could (in certain ways) rival my DSLR, but sure enough this one did.

I used no 'automatic' settings for this - I'm so used to manual and I feel like I'm cheating if use any of the auto modes. These photos have been touched up in Lightroom, but still, I was pretty happy.

Outdoors in sunlight always yielded pleasant results:

_DSC1493.jpg

_DSC1986.jpg

_DSC2003.jpg

_DSC2231.jpg

_DSC2236.jpg

_DSC1648.jpg

It also did a fairly good job with 'food porn' - but I wasn't happy with the results shot inside. These photos were taken at the Tangaroa Terrace at the Disneyland Hotel (outside):

_DSC1456.jpg

_DSC1461.jpg

_DSC1463.jpg

...Continued below ...
 
It also handled really well at night, but noise can be an issue. You really need to bump the ISO to get anything close to acceptable.

_DSC1843.jpg _DSC1855.jpg _DSC1880.jpg

_DSC1383.jpg

One area where I was really impressed was doing some long exposure night shots with this camera. Long exposure is my favorite and while it doesn't beat my D800E, it really did a nice job. I used a Manfrodo mini-tripod that I set up on trash cans and other flat surfaces to take these shots.

_DSC1919.jpg

_DSC1522.jpg
_DSC1681.jpg

Where I was disappointed with the camera was in the limited zoom and its performance inside dark rides. I tested it out inside Small World and while I got a few good shots, it was clear to me that this camera wasn't going to do well in low-light, moving environments. Beyond those two issues - this is a great camera to play with when you don't feel like lugging your DSLR around the parks!!

Pete
 
some great shots Pete! I've read a lot of good thing about it, it's good to know I'm ok recommending it to any friends or family when they ask which higher end P & S they should get.
 
I'm torn between the Rx100, ii or iii. I have a Canon dslr but I'm going to WDW in a couple of weeks and I've narrowed it down to the Rx100, just not the model.
 
I'm torn between the Rx100, ii or iii. I have a Canon dslr but I'm going to WDW in a couple of weeks and I've narrowed it down to the Rx100, just not the model.
Personally, I think the III is worth the extra $150. It's got a better lens, and a faster processor.
 
I think you'll be amazed at how well the III handles. Never worked with the II, so I can't say.
 
Go with the original, to save money, or go with the iii. The ii doesn't have a whole lot to make it worth more than the original. (Unless you really need the hotshoe or wifi).
The iii has 3 big upgrades: 1 -- EVF. I tried it in the store, found it to be small and uncomfortable. But certainly better than no viewfinder.
2 -- 24-70/1.8-2.8 lens. A much wider and faster lens. Though if you prefer having more on the telephoto end, it is possible to prefer the 28-100 of the original. But I think most enthusiasts would prefer the faster and wider lens.
3-- Greatly improved stabilization. I have one issue with the original RX100 -- it defaults to a slightly slow shutter speed, and I get a fair amount of camera-shake blur. The stabilization appears much better on the newest model, which may alleviate this issue.
 
Great pics thx for sharing.

I just ordered the RX100 II. Super excited to play with it on upcoming trip!
 

GET A DISNEY VACATION QUOTE

Dreams Unlimited Travel is committed to providing you with the very best vacation planning experience possible. Our Vacation Planners are experts and will share their honest advice to help you have a magical vacation.

Let us help you with your next Disney Vacation!











facebook twitter
Top