clsteve
"It takes a very long time to become young..."
- Joined
- Jul 25, 2012
That's really not that difficult to contemplate. Each did what, a 5%-20% ticket price increase last year? that high number being the tickets they don't want you to buy - the over-inflated ones so you buy a park to park or hopper, or another day to "save" money (like that $195.99 2 day ticket example in the article when an AP is $214.99)... So, give each a very simplistic 9% YTY ticket uplift for the year..... Then look at the QTQ and YTY for each company's Parks rev....Absolutely agree. Six Flags is a series of regional amusement parks compared to Univeral's true destination Resorts. I was just using a player in a similar business to drive home a point about Disney's massive size. You're right about there being a difference in quality, offerings, and true hotel availability. No disputing that.
Keep in mind rteetz, as you well know Universal raised ticket prices last January. http://articles.orlandosentinel.com...rsal-orlando-the-wizarding-world-diagon-alley
Now you and I both know that these ticket prices effect the entire year. Remember that Universal reports growth year over year just like Disney. So a significant portion of those revenues are attributable to ticket price increases that took place early last year. Not trying to negate the attendance growth but it certainly helped Revenues that there was a nice price increase too.
The really interesting thing would've been to see both Resorts without price increases. It's true Disney would've grown more slowly but so would Universal.
That's why you've got to be careful bringing up numbers. Like in your example above. Sometimes, it doesn't support the point a person's trying to make. And can actually make it look worse, unless you're careful....